The careless use of language in quantum information
K. Wiesner

TL;DR
This paper critically examines how certain terminology in quantum information science, such as 'ancilla qubit' and 'quantum supremacy', may inadvertently reinforce social inequalities and hierarchical language.
Contribution
It highlights the social implications of scientific language in quantum information and calls for more mindful terminology to promote inclusivity.
Findings
Identification of problematic terms in quantum information
Discussion on social implications of scientific language
Call for more inclusive scientific terminology
Abstract
An imperative aspect of modern science is that scientific institutions act for the benefit of a common scientific enterprise, rather than for the personal gain of individuals within them. This implies that science should not perpetuate existing or historical unequal social orders. Some scientific terminology, though, gives a very different impression. I will give two examples of terminology invented recently for the field of quantum information which use language associated with subordination, slavery, and racial segregation: 'ancilla qubit' and 'quantum supremacy'.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Mechanics and Applications
