Inequalities for the inverses of the polygamma functions
Necdet Batir

TL;DR
This paper establishes improved inequalities for the inverses of polygamma and digamma functions using elementary calculus techniques, providing tighter bounds and simpler proofs.
Contribution
It introduces new, sharper inequalities for the inverses of polygamma and digamma functions with elementary proofs, enhancing existing results.
Findings
Derived improved inequalities for polygamma function inverses.
Established bounds for the inverse of the digamma function.
Provided elementary proofs using mean value theorem.
Abstract
We provide an elementary proof of the left side inequality and improve the right inequality in \bigg[\frac{n!}{x-(x^{-1/n}+\alpha)^{-n}}\bigg]^{\frac{1}{n+1}}&<((-1)^{n-1}\psi^{(n)})^{-1}(x) &<\bigg[\frac{n!}{x-(x^{-1/n}+\beta)^{-n}}\bigg]^{\frac{1}{n+1}}, where and , which was proved in \cite{6}, and we prove the following inequalities for the inverse of the digamma function . \frac{1}{\log(1+e^{-x})}<\psi^{-1}(x)< e^{x}+\frac{1}{2}, \quad x\in\mathbb{R}. The proofs are based on nice applications of the mean value theorem for differentiation and elementary properties of the polygamma functions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical Inequalities and Applications Β· Functional Equations Stability Results Β· Mathematics and Applications
Inequalities for the inverses of the polygamma functions
necdet batir
department of mathematics
faculty of sciences and arts
nevΕehΔ±r hacΔ± bektaΕ veli university, nevΕehΔ±r, turkey
Abstract.
We provide an elementary proof of the left side inequality and improve the right inequality in
[TABLE]
where and , which was proved in [6], and we prove the following inequalities for the inverse of the digamma function .
[TABLE]
The proofs are based on nice applications of the mean value theorem for differentiation and elementary properties of the polygamma functions.
Key words and phrases:
inverse of digamma function, mean value theorem, gamma function, polygamma functions, inequalities.
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary: 33B15; Secondary: 26D07.
1. introduction
As it is well known for a positive real number the gamma function is defined to be
[TABLE]
It is a common knowledge that the gamma function plays a special role in the theory of special functions. The most important function related to the gamma function is the digamma or psi function , which is defined by logarithmic derivative of the gamma function , that is,
[TABLE]
The digamma function is closely related with the Euler-Mascheroni constant and harmonic numbers . They satisfy . In [14] it is proved that , when , is equivalent with the Prime Number Theorem, where is th prime number. Functions are called polygamma functions in the literature. Polygamma functions are also very important functions and appear in the evaluations of many series and integrals [2, 9, 12, 13, 16, 18]. They are also related with many special functions such as the Riemann zeta function, Hurwitz zeta function, Clausenβs function and generalized harmonic numbers. There exists a huge literature on inequalities for the digamma and polygamma functions, see [3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11, 15], but for their inverses almost no inequality exists. The only known such an inequality is the following one which is due to the author [6, Theorem 2.5].
[TABLE]
where and . Our first aim in this paper is to give an elementary proof of the left side of this inequality and to improve its right inequality.
Our second aim is to establish, through the use of elementary properties of polygamma functions and the mean value theorem, simple bounds for the inverse of the digamma function . Numerical experiments show that our bounds are are remarkably accurate for all . In our proof we make use of the following relations for the gamma and polygamma functions. The gamma function satisfies the functional equation , and has the following canonical product representation
[TABLE]
where is Euler-Mascheroni constant; see [18, pg.346]. Taking logarithm of both sides of this formula, we obtain for
[TABLE]
Differentiation gives
[TABLE]
For and
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
See [1, p.260] for these and further properties of these functions.
2. main result
We collect our main results in this section.
Theorem 2.1**.**
For and we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
By (1.5) we have for
[TABLE]
Using (1.4), we get for
[TABLE]
By mean value theorem for differentiation we have
[TABLE]
We therefore can write (2.3) as following
[TABLE]
From (2.4) we have
[TABLE]
We want to show that is strictly increasing on . For this purpose we define
[TABLE]
Clearly, is equivalent to . Differentiation gives
[TABLE]
We conclude that is strictly increasing if and only if
[TABLE]
which follows from the fact that the generalized mean
[TABLE]
is strictly increasing in ; see [17, pg. 234]. Indeed (2.7) is equivalent to . Using (2.6) we get
[TABLE]
In [6, Lemma 1.4] with this limit is evaluated and equals to 1/2. Thus,
[TABLE]
By (2.6) it is clear that
[TABLE]
From the fact that is strictly increasing we conclude from (2.5) that
[TABLE]
or taking into account (1.4)
[TABLE]
Since the mapping is strictly decreasing, applying the inverse of this function to both sides of (2.10) and using (2.8) and (2.9) we get
[TABLE]
where is the iverse of the mapping . Setting here we get the desired result (2.1). β
Remark 2.2*.*
Numerical computations show that the upper bound given in (2.1) is much accurate than that of (1).
Theorem 2.3**.**
For we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
We want to give two different proofs.
First proof. Applying the mean value theorem to on and using the functional equation for the gamma function, we obtain
[TABLE]
We want to show that is strictly increasing on . Differentiation gives
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
By (2.14) we have
[TABLE]
Substituting this into (2.15) gives
[TABLE]
We now show that the right hand side of this identity is positive. Letβs define for
[TABLE]
Applying the recurrence relations
[TABLE]
which follows from (1.5), we obtain for positive
[TABLE]
Using
[TABLE]
we find that
[TABLE]
where . Since and , we get for all . Thus, the left side of (2.18) is positive. This fact and (2.17) together imply for that . This reveals that
[TABLE]
Since for , we conclude from (2.16) that . That is, is strictly decreasing on . Since is strictly decreasing and , (2.14) yields
[TABLE]
Using the asymptotic expansion
[TABLE]
see [1, pg 260; 6.4.12] we see that the limits of both bounds in (2.19) tend to 0 as goes to infinity, that is, . We therefore have . Therefore, is a monotonic increasing function of on . Replacing by in (2.13), and using the fact that both and are strictly increasing on we get
[TABLE]
Employing the well known recurrence relation
[TABLE]
we obtain from (2.20) and (2.13)
[TABLE]
or
[TABLE]
Applying both sides, this becomes by (2.13)
[TABLE]
Replacing by in (2.13) and using the relation (2.21) we get that
[TABLE]
Since is bounded and strictly increasing it has a limit as approaches to infinity. We therefore conclude from (2.13) and (2.23) that
[TABLE]
So monotonic increase of and and Equation (2.23) imply that
[TABLE]
Combining (2.22) and (2.24) it follows that
[TABLE]
The desired inequality (2.1) now follows from replacing by here, after applying both sides.
Second proof. Utilizing the functional equation in (1.4) and using (1.2), we obtain
[TABLE]
By mean value theorem we get
[TABLE]
So (2) becames
[TABLE]
It is clear from (2.22) that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
We can easily compute that
[TABLE]
We want to show that is strictly increasing on . Setting in (2.28) its right hand side becomes
[TABLE]
So in order to prove that is strictly increasing on , it suffices to show that is strictly increasing on If we differentiate and apply the well known geometric-logarithmic mean inequality we see that , which implies that is strictly increasing on . Hence we conclude from (2.27) that
[TABLE]
Using (2.27), (2.28) and (1.3) we obtain
[TABLE]
Since is strictly increasing on , applying both sides of this inequalities we get
[TABLE]
Replacing by here completes the proof of Theorem 2.1. β
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] M. Abramowitz, I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical functions, Dover, New York, 1965.
- 2[2] V. S. Adamchik, On the Barnes Function, Available at: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/ adamchik/articles/issac/issac 01.pdf.
- 3[3] H. Alzer, O. G. Ruehr, A submultiplicative property of the psi function, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 101 (1999), 53-60.
- 4[4] H. Alzer, G. Jameson, A harmonic mean inequality for the digamma function and related results, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova, 2017, in press.
- 5[5] G. Andrew, R. Askey, R. Roy, Special Functions, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, v.71, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
- 6[6] N. Batir, On some properties of digamma and polygamma functions, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 328(2007), 452-465.
- 7[7] N. Batir, Sharp inequalities for the psi function and harmonic numbers, Math. Inequal. Appl., Volume 14, Number 4 (2011), 917-925.
- 8[8] J. M. Borwein, P. B. Borwein, Pi and the AGM, John Wiles and Sons, 1987.
