On a conjecture of B. C. Kellner
Olivier Bordell\`es

TL;DR
This paper proves a recent conjecture by Kellner regarding the number of distinct prime factors in a specific prime product, utilizing advanced analytic number theory techniques.
Contribution
It provides a rigorous proof of Kellner's conjecture using sophisticated estimates from analytic number theory.
Findings
Confirmed Kellner's conjecture on prime factors
Applied Granville-Ramaré exponential sum estimates
Enhanced understanding of prime factorization in special products
Abstract
The aim of this note is a proof of a recent conjecture of Kellner concerning the number of distinct prime factors of a particular product of primes. The proof uses profound results from analytic number theory, such as Granville-Ramar\'{e}'s estimate of an exponential sum over primes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnalytic Number Theory Research · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
On a conjecture of B. C. Kellner
Olivier Bordellès
2 allée de la combe
43000 Aiguilhe
France
Abstract.
The aim of this note is a proof of a recent conjecture of Kellner concerning the number of distinct prime factors of a particular product of primes. The proof uses profound results from analytic number theory, such as Granville-Ramaré’s estimate of an exponential sum over primes.
Key words and phrases:
Walfisz’s exponential sum, prime numbers.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary 11N37; Secondary 11L20, 11A41.
1. Introduction and main result
Let . In a recent paper [4], Kellner studies the product
[TABLE]
where stands for the sum of the digits in the base- expansion of . Recall that, from Legendre’s formula, . As it is shown in [4, 5], the values of this product are closely related to the denominators of the Bernoulli polynomials. In [4], the author proves that
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
and points out that the trivial bound is sharp. On the other hand, the first bound concerning the number of distinct prime factors of , coming from the identity (see [4, Theorem 4])
[TABLE]
does not seem to be the best one and, on the basis of extended computations, the author surmises that there exists such that, for
[TABLE]
In this note, we provide a proof of Conjecture (C) which is a consequence of the more precise following result.
Theorem 1**.**
For any integer sufficiently large
[TABLE]
where the function is given in (3) below and
[TABLE]
is the exponential integral.
Since, for any
[TABLE]
we deduce immediately the following estimate.
Corollary 2**.**
For any integer sufficiently large and any
[TABLE]
2. Notation.
is a large integer, say , and always denotes a prime number. For any , and . For and real numbers
[TABLE]
Finally
[TABLE]
3. Tools
Lemma 3**.**
For any , and
[TABLE]
Proof.
Interchanging the order of summation, we get
[TABLE]
Writing each as with , and , we infer
[TABLE]
and hence
[TABLE]
as asserted. ∎
Corollary 4**.**
. Then
[TABLE]
Proof.
Since the function is non-increasing, if , then
[TABLE]
Consequently, the sum of the left-hand side does not exceed
[TABLE]
and the proof is achieved with the use of Lemma 3 with , , and . ∎
Lemma 5**.**
Let and be any map. For any
[TABLE]
Proof.
See [1, Corollary 6.2]. ∎
Lemma 6**.**
If , then, for any
[TABLE]
Proof.
See [3, Theorem 9] with . ∎
Lemma 7**.**
For any real number
[TABLE]
Proof.
By partial summation and the Prime Number Theorem, for instance in the form given in [2]
[TABLE]
and integrating by parts
[TABLE]
as asserted. ∎
4. Proof of Theorem 1
4.1. First step
Notice that, if , then
[TABLE]
and hence
[TABLE]
so that we get from (2)
[TABLE]
Split the sum into two subsums as
[TABLE]
4.2. The sum
We use Corollary 4 with giving immediately
[TABLE]
4.3. The sum
First write
[TABLE]
say.
4.3.1. The main term
From Lemma 7
[TABLE]
and the inequalities
[TABLE]
imply that
[TABLE]
and hence
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
4.3.2. The error term
It remains to prove that, for sufficiently large
[TABLE]
This estimate follows from the next result.
Lemma 8**.**
For any integer sufficiently large
[TABLE]
Proof.
Split the interval into dyadic subintervals of the shape so that
[TABLE]
where either or . From Lemma 5
[TABLE]
and, for any , we have
[TABLE]
so that, by Abel summation
[TABLE]
Now by Abel summation and Lemma 6
[TABLE]
Consequently
[TABLE]
Choose
[TABLE]
so that
[TABLE]
and hence
[TABLE]
whenever is sufficiently large, concluding the proof. ∎
4.4. Completion of the proof of Theorem 1
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] O. Bordellès, Arithmetic Tales , Springer, utx , 2012.
- 2[2] K. Ford, Vinogradov’s integral and bounds for the Riemann zeta function, Proc. London Math. Soc. 85 (2002), 565–633.
- 3[3] A. Granville & O. Ramaré, Explicit bounds on exponential sums and the scarcity of squarefree binomial coefficients, Mathematika 43 (1996), 73–107.
- 4[4] B. C. Kellner, On a product of certain primes, J. Number Theory 179 (2017), 149–164.
- 5[5] B. C. Kellner and J. Sondow, Power-Sum Denominators, preprint, 2017, https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.03857 .
- 6[6] A. Walfisz, Weylsche Exponentialsummen in der neueren Zahlentheorie , Veb Deutscher Verlag der Wissenchaften, Berlin 1963.
