On Eisenstein series in $M_{2k}(\Gamma_0(N))$ and their applications
Zafer Selcuk Aygin

TL;DR
This paper derives formulas for Fourier coefficients of Eisenstein series in modular forms, enabling applications to divisor sums, quadratic forms, and extending to more general modular forms.
Contribution
It introduces an orthogonal relation for Eisenstein series in $M_{2k}(\Gamma_0(N))$ and uses it to explicitly compute Fourier coefficients, extending classical divisor sum and quadratic form results.
Findings
Formulas for Fourier coefficients of Eisenstein series in terms of divisor sums.
Extensions of Ramanujan's convolution sum results.
Expressions for the number of representations of integers by quadratic forms.
Abstract
Let with square-free and . We prove an orthogonal relation and use this to compute the Fourier coefficients of the Eisenstein part of any in terms of sum of divisors function. In particular, if , then the computation will to yield to an expression for the Fourier coefficients of . Then we apply our main theorem to give formulas for convolution sums of the divisor function to extend the result by Ramanujan, and to eta quotients which yields to formulas for number of representations of integers by certain families of quadratic forms. At last we give essential results to derive similar results for modular forms in a more general setting.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
On Eisenstein series in and their applications
Zafer Selcuk Aygin
Division of Mathematical Sciences, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 21 Nanyang Link, Singapore 637371, Singapore
Abstract.
Let with square-free and . We prove an orthogonal relation and use this to compute the Fourier coefficients of the Eisenstein part of any in terms of sum of divisors function. In particular, if , then the computation will to yield to an expression for the Fourier coefficients of . Then we apply our main theorem to give formulas for convolution sums of the divisor function to extend the result by Ramanujan, and to eta quotients which yields to formulas for number of representations of integers by certain families of quadratic forms. At last we give essential results to derive similar results for modular forms in a more general setting.
Keywords: sum of divisors function, convolution sums, theta functions, representations by quadratic forms, Eisenstein series, Dedekind eta function, eta quotients, modular forms, cusp forms, Fourier series.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 11A25, 11E20, 11E25, 11F11, 11F20, 11F27, 11F30, 11Y35.
1. Introduction
Let , , , , and denote the sets of positive integers, non-negative integers, integers, rational numbers, complex numbers and the upper half plane, respectively. Throughout the paper we let and . Let () be the modular subgroup defined by
[TABLE]
An element acts on by
[TABLE]
Let . We write to denote the space of modular forms of weight for ; and and to denote the subspaces of Eisenstein forms and cusp forms of , respectively. It is known (see for example [18] and [19, p. 83]) that
[TABLE]
In the remainder of the paper, unless otherwise stated, we assume is square-free, always stands for prime numbers, and all the divisors considered are positive divisors.
A set of representatives of cusps of , when is square-free, is given by
[TABLE]
see [8, Proposition 2.6].
Let
[TABLE]
then the Fourier series expansion of at the cusp is given by the Fourier series expansion of at the cusp , see [10, pg. 35]. Let the Fourier series expansion of at the cusp be given by the infinite sum
[TABLE]
where is the width of at the cusp . Then we use the notation to denote . We write , instead of , at the cusp . If we say Fourier series expansion (or Fourier coefficients) without specifying the cusp, we mean the expansion (or coefficients) at the cusp . And, for modular forms, ‘the first term of the Fourier expansion of at cusp ’ refers to the term . We define the order of at to be the smallest such that .
The Dedekind eta function is the holomorphic function defined on the upper half plane by the product formula
[TABLE]
Let and for all , where the are not all zero. Let . We define an eta quotient by the product formula
[TABLE]
For and we define the sum of divisors function by
[TABLE]
If we set . We define the Eisenstein series by
[TABLE]
where are Bernoulli numbers, defined by the generating function
[TABLE]
For all and we have
[TABLE]
see [19, Theorem 5.8]. Noting that stands for the number of distinct prime divisors of , we state our main theorem.
Theorem 1.1**.**
Let be square-free and be an integer. Let . Then there exists a cusp form such that
[TABLE]
In particular, if then we have
[TABLE]
Comparing coefficients of on both sides of equations (1.5) and (1.6), for we have
[TABLE]
in particular, if then for we have
[TABLE]
If , then it is analytic at all cusps. Thus, it is possible to calculate for all . That is, Theorem 1.1 can be applied to any to obtain its Eisenstein part. In most applications of modular forms in number theory, we realized, only the expansion at infinity is considered. This approach is pretty useful, however it fails to provide general results. Consideration of expansions at other cusps, as we do in this paper, allows us to derive more general results using modular forms. As detailed in Section 6 similar formulas can be obtained for other modular form spaces. This can be applied to a plethora of different questions, most notably to deriving arithmetic properties of modular forms in a more general setting, see Section 6.
In the next section, we compute Fourier series expansions of the modular forms where at the cusps . In Section 3, we use these expansions, together with the orthogonal relation given by Lemma 3.1, to prove Theorem 1.1. In Sections 4 and 5, we apply Theorem 1.1, to convolution sums of the divisor function and eta quotients, respectively. In the last section we describe how to derive statements similar to Theorem 1.1 for other modular form spaces. All the theorems and corollaries stated in this paper are new, and if we fix and/or , our formulas agree with the previously known formulas. We discuss the details of Sections 4, 5 and 6.
Let and let us define the convolution sum
[TABLE]
for . This convolution sum is a generalized version of the convolution sum defined by Ramanujan in [15], where he gave a formula for . For some history on the formulas for , see [2, 9]. In Section 4, we use Theorem 1.1 to give the following formula:
[TABLE]
where are square-free, , . This formula extends the result given by Ramanujan in [15], except the cases or . This is due to the complicated behaviour of weight Eisenstein series at cusps. (See [2], for a treatment of the case when and .) At the end of Section 4, we let the level to be to illustrate this formula, we then describe (for all ) in terms of eta quotients and finally we let to deduce that (1.9) agrees with the formula given by Ramanujan.
Let , , and for all . Let
[TABLE]
denote the number of representations of by the quadratic form
[TABLE]
In Section 5, we apply Theorem 1.1 to obtain the following formula for representations of an integer by a family of quadratic forms with odd square-free coefficients:
[TABLE]
Then we compare our formula with recent formulas from Cooper et al. [7] and classical results by Ramanujan [6, 12, 15]. We also illustrate our formula with and give a description of in terms of eta quotients.
One can use (1.8) to determine Fourier coefficients of eta quotients in . In [1] we take advantage of a similar idea, for fixed weight and level, to determine Fourier coefficients of certain families of weight eta quotients. It seems, if square-free and the weight is greater than , then there are only two eta quotients in . We try to explain the reason for this in Section 5.
In Section 6 we find the equivalent of (2.1) for Eisenstein series those twisted by Dirichlet characters. The rest of the section is dedicated to explain how to apply these methods to modular form spaces in a more general setting.
2. Preliminary results
Let . In this section we state and prove Theorem 2.1, which gives the Fourier series expansions of at cusps . We use Theorem 2.1 to compute first terms of Fourier series expansions of at the cusps . Together with the fact that the first terms of Fourier series expansions of cusp forms are always [math], Theorem 2.1 will be used to prove Theorem 1.1. Then we give a ‘Sturm bound’ for Eisenstein series and at last we give an interesting relationship between the Fourier coefficients of and .
Theorem 2.1**.**
Let . Let , with the Fourier series expansion given by
[TABLE]
Then for , the Fourier series expansion of at cusp is given by
[TABLE]
where , is some integer, is the matrix given by (1.2) and .
Proof.
The Fourier series expansion of at the cusp is given by the Fourier series expansion of at the cusp . We have
[TABLE]
where . As , there exist such that . Thus . Then for , we have
[TABLE]
which completes the proof. Note that, the value of is independent of choice of . ∎
Noting that the width of at the cusp is , it follows from Theorem 2.1 and (1.4) that the terms of the Fourier coefficients of at the cusp () are
[TABLE]
for all , .
Let be an integer, be square-free and be the smallest prime that divides . Then, using (2.2), it is not hard to see that
[TABLE]
if and only if for all . This gives us the following theorem, which could be viewed as a Sturm Theorem for Eisenstein forms. Note that this bound is much smaller than the Sturm bound, which is to be expected.
Theorem 2.2**.**
Let be an integer, be square-free and be the smallest prime that divides . Let be a non-zero function. Then for all , we have
To stress the intimate relationship between a modular form and its orders of zeros at cusps we note the following relation. Let be square-free and be an integer, and . Then from (2.2), we deduce that if then .
3. Proof of Theorem 1.1
Let be square-free and be an integer. Assume that . By [19, Theorem 5.9] and (1.1), we have
[TABLE]
for some and . By definition the first terms of Fourier series expansions of cusp forms are always [math]. Then by (2.1), for each , we have
[TABLE]
In Lemma 3.1 below we give an orthogonal relation, which is useful for computing the inverse of the coefficient matrix of system of linear equations given by (3.1). Then we use this inverse matrix obtained to compute in terms of . This completes the proof of Theorem 1.1.
Lemma 3.1**.**
Let be square-free and be an integer. Then for all , we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let be square-free, be an integer and . Let
[TABLE]
Let us fix a prime . Then for all , we have
[TABLE]
where in the last step we use the equation (for )
[TABLE]
If , then there exists a prime , such that . Then by (3.2), we have .
For , by (3.2), we have
[TABLE]
∎
4. Application: Convolution sums of the divisor function
Let be square-free, be integers and be such that . Then we have
[TABLE]
Thus, combining Theorem 1.1 and (2.1), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 4.1**.**
Let be square-free. Let be integers and be such that . Then there exists a cusp form such that
[TABLE]
where . Comparing coefficients of () in (4.1) we obtain the formula for given by (1.9).
Below we give the description of cusp forms in for all in terms of eta quotients. Let , and let us define the following eta quotient
[TABLE]
We note that the order of at is , i.e. we have when . This ensures linear independence and lower triangular shape of coefficients of these eta quotients. By [10, Corollary 2.3, p. 37] and [14, Theorem 1.64] we have for all and . Since the dimension of is for all , and () are linearly independent, we obtain a basis for .
Theorem 4.2**.**
Let be an integer. Then the set of eta quotients
[TABLE]
form a basis for , i.e. letting we have
[TABLE]
where can be calculated recursively.
Theorem 4.2 gives an example of a family of modular form spaces which is generated by eta quotients, a question raised by Ono in [14] and answered by Rouse and Webb in [16]. Now we can express for as linear combinations of .
Below we give two beautiful examples. We first let in (1.9). Then we have
[TABLE]
which, for , is a similar expression to the one given by Ramanujan in [15]. In (4.3) the cusp part vanishes when ; ; ; , in agreement with Ramanujan’s results in [15].
Second, we let in (1.9), and . Then we have
[TABLE]
Replace by in (4.4) to see that the cusp part of (4.4) never vanishes.
5. Application: On eta quotients and representations by quadratic forms
In this section we apply Theorem 1.1 to eta quotients in . We start with a special eta quotient which has applications to representations by quadratic forms. Then in the second part we give a general statement concerning eta quotients. We then discuss when these eta quotients has no cusp form component.
Let be an odd square-free number, and let . Then for (), not all zeros, we have
[TABLE]
where . is square-free, thus we can apply Theorem 1.1 to (5.1).
Theorem 5.1**.**
Let be an odd square-free number. Let (, not all zeros), and . Then there exists a cusp form , such that
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let be an odd square-free number, (, not all zeros), and . We use [10, Proposition 2.1] to compute
[TABLE]
Thus we have
[TABLE]
The result follows from Theorem 1.1, by putting the values of in (1.5). ∎
Below we apply Theorem 5.1, to give formulas concerning representations by quadratic forms. Following Ramanujan’s notation, let us define
[TABLE]
Then we have
[TABLE]
On the other hand, by [4, (1.3.13)], we have , (or equivalently ). Replacing by in Theorem 5.1, we have the following statement.
Theorem 5.2**.**
Let be an odd square-free number, , , not all zeros, and . Then we have
[TABLE]
We compare coefficients of on both sides of (5.2) to obtain the formula for given by (1.10).
Now we illustrate Theorem 5.2, for the case , a prime. Let and . Then we have
[TABLE]
Letting in (5.3), we obtain
[TABLE]
Recently in [7], Cooper, Kane and Ye obtained formulas for , valid for all and . For , we have
[TABLE]
We use (5.5) to show that the Eisenstein parts of the formula in [7] and of (5.4) agrees when . Our formula is valid for all primes, but fails when .
We let , and in (5.3), then by Theorem 4.2 and (5.3) we have
[TABLE]
which, after an algebraic manipulation, with an equation similar to (5.5), agrees with the Ramanujan-Mordell formula, see [6, 12, 15].
In general Theorem 1.1 can be applied to any eta quotient in . The statement is as follows.
Theorem 5.3**.**
Let be square-free and be an integer. Let , not all zero. If then for , we have
[TABLE]
where is a norm constant which can be determined by [10, Theorem 1.7].
Note that if then , thus Theorem 5.3 determines Fourier coefficients of the eta quotient . One can use Theorem 2.2, (5.10) below and pigeonhole principle to show that there are only finitely many eta quotients in for each square-free. We further believe, disregarding the repetitions, the following well-known equations are the only such examples:
[TABLE]
Below we try to explain the reason of this. Before we start, note that there are two types of repetitions, first if , then we also have for any . Second, if we have , then . Note that it is slightly different from the concept of oldforms (which is defined for cusp forms). In the following arguments we assume is not a repetition. Assuming , we have
[TABLE]
We compare both sides of (5.8) at different cusps using (2.1) and (2.2). The zeros of the eta quotient yield to the equations
[TABLE]
On the other hand, for sum of orders of zeros of , we have
[TABLE]
see [3, (4.2.9)] for the details, we also have the number of inequivalent cusps of is . It appears, if , then the number of linearly independent equations coming from (5.9) which equal to zero are equal to the number of variables . This forces . We have for the couples , , , , , , , , , , , . Finally, we use similar arguments used in [1] to find out (5.6) and (5.7) are the only eta quotients in spaces corresponding to the couples above.
6. On non-square-free level modular forms
In this section we describe how to determine the Eisenstein terms of any modular form in integer weight spaces. Serre’s result [17] (or see [13, p. 300]) is a widely used tool to derive arithmetic properties of modular forms. However this requires the modular form to be a cusp form. Below we explain how to strip the modular forms from their Eisenstein part to determine their cusp part. Then using arithmetic properties of Eisenstein series and Serre’s result one can derive arithmetic properties of modular forms (not necessarily a cusp form).
Let be the space of integer weight modular forms for level (not necessarily square-free) with multiplier . It is well-known that the basis of can be given by the non-normalized Eisenstein series
[TABLE]
where ; and and are primitive Dirichlet characters with conductors and , respectively, such that , and , see [11, Ch. 7] or [19, Theorem 5.9] for details. To give the equivalent of Theorem 1.1 for one needs to compute the first terms of at the cusps of , and follow the arguments of the proof of the main theorem. Below we explain how to compute the first term of Fourier expansion of at cusp with . Then there exist such that , i.e. we have . Hence the Fourier series expansion of at cusp is given by the Fourier series expansion of at cusp . When right hand side of (6.1) is convergent, thus we have
[TABLE]
Assuming the cusp width is and cusp parameter is , has an expansion of the form , see [10, (1.18)]. Thus the contribution to the comes from the terms with , that is, for , we have
[TABLE]
This gives an equivalent of (2.1) for . We then use these terms to form a set of linear equations as in (3.1) and solve it to obtain a statement equivalent to Theorem 1.1 for . Noting that the expansion of at infinity is given by [11, Theorem 7.1.3], the solution yields to a formula for the Eisenstein part of a modular form with and not necessarily a square-free number.
Please note that the first terms of at the cusps which can also be obtained by the above arguments agrees with the ones from Theorem 2.1. Theorem 2.1 additionally gives all the Fourier coefficients of at the cusps , which is needed for some previous discussions.
Let be prime and . Let be the Kronecker symbol and denote the primitive principal character. As an example we work on the eta quotient , a function which plays important role in the theory of partition functions. One can use the arguments above, [10, Proposition 2.1], and a well-known equation for the case to prove that there exists a cusp form such that
[TABLE]
where is the Dirichlet L-function associated with . Then we use the series expansion of given by [11, Theorem 7.1.3] to obtain
[TABLE]
where is the generalized Bernoulli number, for which we have , see [5, Theorem 3]. It is easy to see and for . For we have
[TABLE]
For , implies that . Hence we have
[TABLE]
This gives an alternative proof of being equivalent to a cusp form with modulo , one of the key arguments in Ono’s celebrated paper ‘Distribution of the partition function modulo ’, see [13, Section 3].
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Song Heng Chan for his helpful comments throughout the course of this research, and I am grateful to Heng Huat Chan, whose feedback helped to give a more elegant proof of Lemma 3.1. I am also indebted to Kenneth S. Williams for his encouraging remarks and corrections on an earlier version of this work. The author was supported by the Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund, Tier 2, project number MOE2014-T2-1-051, ARC40/14.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] A. Alaca, Ş. Alaca Z. S. Aygin, Fourier coefficients of a class of eta quotients of weight 2 2 2 , Int. J. Number Theory 11 (2015), 2381–2392.
- 2[2] Z. S. Aygin, Eisenstein series and convolution sums, Ramanujan J., accepted, doi:10.1007/s 11139-018-0055-2.
- 3[3] Z. S. Aygin, Eisenstein series, eta quotients and their applications in number theory , (Doctoral dissertation.) Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. 2016.
- 4[4] B. C. Berndt, Number Theory in the Spirit of Ramanujan, Springer-Verlag, 1991.
- 5[5] L. Carlitz, Arithmetic properties of generalized Bernoulli numbers , Journal fur die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal), 1959.202 (2009): 174–182.
- 6[6] H. H. Chan S. Cooper, Powers of theta functions , Pacific J. Math. 235 (2008), 1–14.
- 7[7] S. Cooper, B. Kane D. Ye, Analogues of the Ramanujan–Mordell theorem , J. Math. Anal. Appl. 446 (2017), 568–579.
- 8[8] H. Iwaniec, Topics in Classical Automorphic Forms, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 17. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1997.
