
TL;DR
This paper derives polynomial-time bounds on the number of satisfying assignments for CNF SAT instances, relating these bounds to distribution properties like mean and variance, especially for large formulas.
Contribution
It introduces new polynomial-time computable bounds on #SAT counts based on distribution metrics, improving understanding of satisfiability counts for large instances.
Findings
Bounds depend on distribution variance and mean.
Some bounds are computable in polynomial time.
Bounds are more relevant for formulas with many solutions.
Abstract
Limits on the number of satisfying assignments for CNS instances with n variables and m clauses are derived from various inequalities. Some bounds can be calculated in polynomial time, sharper bounds demand information about the distribution of the number of unsatisfied clauses. Quite generally, the number of satisfying assignments involve variance and mean of this distribution. For large formulae, m>>1, bounds vary with 2**n/n, so they may be of use only for instances with a large number of satisfying assignments.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsConstraint Satisfaction and Optimization · Formal Methods in Verification
