An explicit formula for a branched covering from $\mathbb{CP}^2$ to $S^4$
J.A.Hillman

TL;DR
This paper presents an explicit formula for a 2-fold branched covering from complex projective plane to the 4-sphere, connecting it with other quotient maps of product spheres.
Contribution
It provides the first explicit formula for such a branched covering from al^2 to S^4, linking it to known quotient maps.
Findings
Explicit formula for the branched covering
Relation to quotient maps of S^2 S^2
Advances understanding of mappings between complex and real 4-manifolds
Abstract
We give an explicit formula for a 2-fold branched covering from to , and relate it to other maps between quotients of .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Geometric and Algebraic Topology · Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
an explicit formula for a branched covering from to
J.A.Hillman
School of Mathematics and Statistics
University of Sydney, NSW 2006
Australia
Abstract.
We give an explicit formula for a 2-fold branched covering from to , and relate it to other maps between quotients of .
Key words and phrases:
branched cover,projective plane, 4-sphere
1991 Mathematics Subject Classification:
57M12, 57N13
It is well known that the quotient of the complex projective plane by complex conjugation is the 4-sphere [2, 4]. (See also [1].) A key element of Massey’s exposition is the identification of with the 2-fold symmetric product , the quotient of by the involution which exchanges the factors. Lawson has displayed very clearly the topology underlying these facts [3]. We shall use harmonic coordinates for real and complex projective spaces to give explicit formulae for some of these quotient maps. (We describe briefly the work of Massey and Kuiper at the end of this note.)
A smooth map between closed -manifolds is a 2-fold branched covering if has a codimension-2 submanifold (the branch locus), such that is a 2-to-1 immersion, is a bijection onto a submanifold (the branch set) and along the map looks like in local coordinates, with and transverse complex coordinate .
We shall view as the unit sphere in . The antipodal involution is given by multiplying the coordinates by . Let and be the diagonal of and the graph of , respectively. Let and be the diffeomorphisms of given by and , for . Then and generate a dihedral group of order 8, since and . This group acts freely on the complement of . In particular, acts freely on and , while fixes pointwise and acts freely on .
Let be the stereographic projection, given by , for . Then its inverse is given by
[TABLE]
and the antipodal map is given in harmonic coordinates by
[TABLE]
for . The image of under is the diagonal .
Let , and be the maps given by , and , for . Then and are biholomorphic, and . Therefore is a 2-fold branched covering, branched over . The extension given by
[TABLE]
is a 2-fold branched covering, branched over . (The restriction is essentially the 2-canonical embedding of in , with image the conic .) The composite is essentially Lawson’s map, giving
[TABLE]
Let be complex conjugation, for . Then . Lawson observed that if is the linear automorphism given by
[TABLE]
then
[TABLE]
Hence is conjugate to a map covered by the free involution . (Note that , and .)
If we identify with and use real harmonic coordinates we may instead extend to a map , given by
[TABLE]
This is a 2-fold branched covering, with branch locus the diagonal, and induces a diffeomorphism
[TABLE]
The map has a lift , given by
[TABLE]
where is the radial normalization. (If then the norm of is .) We may also obtain by normalizing the map
[TABLE]
This map is invariant under and , and is generically 4-to-1. Hence it factors through a map , and induces maps and .
The lattice of quotients of by the subgroups of the group generated by and is a commuting diagram:
S^{2}\times{S^{2}}$$S^{2}\times\mathbb{RP}^{2}$$\mathbb{RP}^{2}\times{S^{2}}$$S^{2}\times{S^{2}}/\langle\sigma^{2}\rangle$$\mathbb{CP}^{2}$$\mathbb{RP}^{2}\times\mathbb{RP}^{2}$$S^{2}\times{S^{2}}/\langle\sigma\rangle$$S^{4}$$\mathbb{RP}^{4}$$\lambda$$g$$g^{+}$$G$$h
The five nontrivial subgroups of that do not contain (namely, , , , and ) each act freely, and the unlabeled maps are 2-fold covering projections. The maps , , and are each 2-fold branched coverings, since acts freely on . The part of this diagram involving the vertices , , , and is displayed in [4].
On the affine piece we have
[TABLE]
Hence
[TABLE]
on . Homogenizing this formula gives
[TABLE]
The argument of is nonzero when , and its length is the square root of an homogeneous quartic polynomial in the real and imaginary parts of the harmonic coordinates of . The map is continuous, and is real analytic away from . Its essential structure is most easily seen after using to make a linear change of coordinates. Let . Then
[TABLE]
for all . (Writing out the norm of the argument of explicitly does not lead to further enlightenment.)
It is clear from this formula that . The map is a 2-fold branched covering, with branch locus , the set of real points of , and so is the quotient of by complex conjugation [2, 4].
We conclude by showing that the branch set is unknotted in . We view as the unit sphere in the space of purely imaginary quaternions and shall identify with the unit quaternions. The standard inner product on is given by , for . Let
[TABLE]
Then and , while for all . The map given by for all is a 2-fold covering projection, and so . It is easily seen that and are regular neighbourhoods of and , respectively. The partition into two pieces with common boundary is invariant under the action of , and the pieces are swapped by . Hence there is an induced partition of into two diffeomorphic pieces. Since the image of in is a regular neighbourhood of the branch set, and its complement is diffeomorphic to this regular neighbourhood, the branch set is the image of one of the (two) standard unknotted embeddings of in , by Theorem 3 of [5].
Remark. The main step in [4] used a result on fixed point sets of involutions of symmetric products to obtain a diffeomorphism . Our contribution has been the explicit branched covering , and the subsequent formulae for and . The argument in [2] was very different. Let be the function given by
[TABLE]
Then for all and , so factors through . Moreover, for all , so factors through . The image of lies in the affine hyperplane defined by . Let . Then induces the Veronese embedding of in this hyperplane. Kuiper showed that is the boundary of the convex hull of in , and hence that induces a PL homeomorphism from to .
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Akbulut, S. and Kirby, R.C. Branched covers of surfaces in 4-manifolds, Math. Ann. 252 (1979/80), 111–131.
- 2[2] Kuiper, N. The quotient space of C P ( 2 ) 𝐶 𝑃 2 CP(2) by complex conjugation is the 4-sphere, Math. Ann. 208 (1974), 175–177.
- 3[3] Lawson, T. Splitting S 4 superscript 𝑆 4 S^{4} on R P 2 𝑅 superscript 𝑃 2 RP^{2} via the branched cover of C P 2 𝐶 superscript 𝑃 2 CP^{2} over S 4 superscript 𝑆 4 S^{4} , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 86 (1982), 328–330.
- 4[4] Massey, W. The quotient space of the complex projective plane under conjugation is the 4-sphere, Geom. Dedicata 2 (1973), 371–374.
- 5[5] Price, T. Homeomorphisms of quaternion space and projective planes in four space, J. Austral. Math. Soc. 23 (1977), 112–128.
