A uniform bound on the Brauer groups of certain log K3 surfaces
Martin Bright, Julian Lyczak

TL;DR
This paper establishes a uniform bound on the size of the Brauer group for certain log K3 surfaces, specifically complements of smooth anticanonical divisors in del Pezzo surfaces of degree ≤7 over number fields.
Contribution
It provides the first effective uniform bound on the Brauer groups of these specific log K3 surfaces, linking the bound to the degree of the base number field.
Findings
Effective uniform bound for Brauer groups established
Bound depends explicitly on the degree of the number field
Advances understanding of arithmetic properties of log K3 surfaces
Abstract
Let U be the complement of a smooth anticanonical divisor in a del Pezzo surface of degree at most 7 over a number field k. We show that there is an effective uniform bound for the size of the Brauer group of U in terms of the degree of k.
| Degree | Possibilities for | |
|---|---|---|
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
A uniform bound on the Brauer groups of certain log K3 surfaces
Martin Bright and Julian Lyczak
Abstract.
Let be the complement of a smooth anticanonical divisor in a del Pezzo surface of degree at most 7 over a number field . We show that there is an effective uniform bound for the size of the Brauer group of in terms of the degree of .
1. Introduction
The Brauer group of an algebraic variety is an invariant whose study goes back to Grothendieck [5, 6, 7]. It has both geometric and arithmetic applications, in particular to the study of rational points. However, the Brauer group of a variety over a non-algebraically closed field is often difficult to compute; even the question of when it is finite is not well understood. Our main result in this article is the following.
Theorem 1.1**.**
Let be a number field, let be a smooth del Pezzo surface of degree at most over , and let be the complement of a smooth, irreducible curve . Denote by the degree , and let be a bound for the maximum order of a torsion point on an elliptic curve over a number field having degree over . Then the order of is bounded by
[TABLE]
That such a bound exists was first proved by Merel [14]. Specifically, Merel proved that, for an elliptic curve over a number field of degree , any prime dividing the order of a torsion element of is bounded by . Together with previously-known results of Faltings and Frey, this proves the existence of a bound on the maximal order of a torsion element in , but does not give an effective determination of . Parent [17] remedied the situation by proving that, if is a prime such that admits a torsion point of order , then the inequality holds. (Parent also gave similar bounds for .) Together, these results give an effective bound on the order of a torsion point on an elliptic curve over .
We begin by putting our result in context. Let denote a number field, and let be a smooth, proper, geometrically integral variety over . Let be an algebraic closure of , and denote by the base change of to . The Brauer group is often split into two parts: the algebraic Brauer group is , and the transcendental Brauer group is the quotient . Of these, the algebraic Brauer group is easier to understand, in part owing to an isomorphism coming from the Hochschild–Serre spectral sequence. The first interesting case is when is a geometrically rational surface; here we have , and so the Brauer group can be calculated once the Galois action on the finitely-generated group is known. In the case of del Pezzo surfaces, all possibilities for the finite group have been tabulated: see [3, Theorem 1.4.1].
A more complicated case is that of K3 surfaces. Here is infinite, but it was proved by Skorobogatov and Zarhin [18] that the quotient is finite. The question then arises of trying to bound this finite group; there has been quite a body of work on this in recent years. Ieronymou, Skorobogatov and Zarhin proved in [10] that, when is a diagonal quartic surface over the field of rational numbers, the order of divides . When is the Kummer surface associated to , with an elliptic curve with complex multiplication, Newton [15] described the odd-order part of . When is the Kummer surface associated to a curve of genus over a number field , Cantoral Farfán, Tang, Tanimoto and Visse [1] described an algorithm for computing a bound for . More generally, Várilly-Alvarado [20, Conjectures 4.5, 4.6] has conjectured that there should be a uniform bound on for any K3 surface , depending only on the geometric Picard lattice of the surface. Recent progress towards this conjecture has been made by Várilly-Alvarado and Viray for certain Kummer surfaces associated to non-CM elliptic curves [21, Theorem 1.8] and by Orr and Skorobogatov for K3 surfaces of CM type [16, Corollary C.1].
So far we have been discussing proper varieties. However, non-proper varieties are also of arithmetic interest. A particular case is that of log K3 surfaces; the arithmetic of integral points on log K3 surfaces shows several features analogous to those of rational points on proper K3 surfaces. See [8] for an introduction to the arithmetic of log K3 surfaces. One example of a log K3 surface is the complement of an anticanonical divisor in a del Pezzo surface, and it is that case with which we concern ourselves in this note.
Some calculations of the Brauer groups of such varieties have already appeared in the literature. In [2], Colliot-Thélène and Wittenberg computed explicitly the Brauer group of the complement of a plane section in certain cubic surfaces. In [11], Jahnel and Schindler carried out extensive calculations in the case of a del Pezzo surface of degree . In this note, we compute the possible algebraic Brauer groups of these surfaces, and use uniform boundedness of torsion of elliptic curves to bound the possible transcendental Brauer groups, resulting in Theorem 1.1.
Remark*.*
One might naturally ask about the cases of degree or . The proof of Theorem 1.1 depends on the fact that del Pezzo surfaces of degree contain exceptional curves. Our proof also shows that the result holds for del Pezzo surfaces of degree which are geometrically isomorphic to blown up in a point. On the other hand, for the remaining del Pezzo surfaces of degree and , i.e. geometrically isomorphic to and respectively, the result does not hold: the torsion in in those cases shows that is infinite. Even if one asks only about the transcendental part of , our proof does not show finiteness; see [2, Proposition 5.3] for a description of the case , that is, the complement of a smooth cubic plane curve.
2. Proof of the theorem
Throughout this section, let be a del Pezzo surface of degree over a number field and let be an anticanonical curve on ; we assume to be smooth and irreducible. The adjunction formula shows that has genus . We will consider the quasi-projective variety . Let be an algebraic closure of and let and denote the base changes to of and respectively. By a line on or on we mean an irreducible curve satisfying .
Recall that the algebraic Brauer group of is defined to be . The quotient , isomorphic to the image of , will be called the transcendental Brauer group of . We will find independent bounds for the algebraic and the transcendental Brauer groups of such log K3 surfaces.
2.1. The algebraic Brauer group
Suppose that has degree . Then is isomorphic to the blow-up of in points, and so the Picard group of , together with its intersection pairing, depends only on . The Galois group acts on preserving intersection numbers, and so the action factors through the isometry group of the lattice, which is known to be the Weyl group of a particular root system. See [13, Sections 25–26] for details.
We have , since is a rational surface (see [13, Theorem 42.8]). Therefore can be computed using the Hochschild–Serre spectral sequence
[TABLE]
Using , the exact sequence of low-degree terms includes
[TABLE]
Because is a number field, we have and therefore an isomorphism
[TABLE]
(On the left we abuse notation slightly: the map need not be injective, but we still write its cokernel as ).
If is the minimal field extension over which all of is defined, then is trivial (since is torsion-free) and the inflation-restriction sequence gives an isomorphism . The Galois group acts faithfully on , so can be identified with a subgroup of the isometry group of the lattice . Thus the finitely many possibilities for may be computed by running through all subgroups of the appropriate Weyl group and calculating the resulting . For the cohomology group is always trivial: see [13, Theorem 29.3]. The calculation for has been carried out by Swinnerton-Dyer [19] and for by Corn [3, Theorem 1.4.1].
For the open subvariety , exactly the same approach yields a calculation of the group , as described by the following proposition.
Proposition 2.1**.**
Let be as in Theorem 1.1. Then depends only on as a Galois module and its order is at most . For , the natural map is an isomorphism. For , the possible combinations of and are as shown in Table 1.
Note that our computations agree with those of Jahnel and Schindler [11, Remark 4.7i)] on del Pezzo surfaces of degree .
Proof.
As is irreducible, a section of on corresponds to a rational function on whose divisor is a multiple of . The intersection of this principal divisor with must be zero and we see that . As above, the Hochschild–Serre spectral sequence gives an isomorphism . By [9, Proposition II.6.5] we have an exact sequence of Galois modules
[TABLE]
where the first maps sends to the anticanonical class in . Enumerating all possible Galois actions on allows us to calculate the possible cohomology groups. For Magma code to accomplish this calculation, see [12]. In the case , the following lemma and the list in Corn [3, Theorem 1.4.1] spares us from what would be a lengthy calculation. ∎
Lemma 2.2**.**
The natural map is injective and the cokernel has exponent dividing , where is the minimal non-zero value of for a divisor on .
Proof.
Let be a divisor with . As above, we have the exact sequence of Galois modules
[TABLE]
The map gives a map with the property that is multiplication by . Consider the following part of the long exact sequence associated to this short exact sequence:
[TABLE]
We see that the cokernel of is isomorphic to the kernel of , which is contained in the kernel of ; but this map is multiplication by . ∎
Corollary 2.3**.**
If is a del Pezzo surface of degree or contains a line defined over , then the map is an isomorphism.
Remark*.*
It follows from the calculations that, of the 19 possible Galois module structures on in the case , only one yields a non-trivial algebraic Brauer group. Using the results in [4] one can construct such log K3 surfaces and even write down a cyclic Azumaya algebra generating this group.
2.2. The transcendental Brauer group
First we will prove Theorem 1.1, following techniques used by Colliot-Thélène and Wittenberg [2], in the situation where at least one of the lines on is defined over . Note that in this case, by Corollary 2.3, the image of in coincides with the algebraic Brauer group .
Lemma 2.4**.**
Suppose that a line is defined over . Let denote the degree . Then the restriction map is injective, and the order of its cokernel is bounded by .
Proof.
Since is smooth, we have the exact sequence
[TABLE]
arising from Grothendieck’s purity theorem [7, Corollaire 6.2]. So it is enough to bound the image of the residue map .
We have and so and intersect transversely at a unique -point on . This gives the following commutative diagram:
[TABLE]
We have and , both of which have Brauer group isomorphic to ; exactness of the bottom row shows that is the zero map. This implies that the image of is contained in the kernel of . The first cohomology group classifies cyclic Galois covers of , and corresponds to those cyclic Galois covers for which the fibre above is a trivial torsor for the structure group . So we consider such covers whose kernel is a disjoint union of -points.
We first bound the degree of such a cover. Let be a cyclic cover of degree , and suppose that the fibre is trivial, so that consists of distinct -points. The Riemann–Hurwitz formula shows that has genus . Pick a point in the fibre . If we regard and as elliptic curves with base points and respectively, then is an isogeny of elliptic curves, and is a cyclic subgroup of order in . In particular, since is an elliptic curve over with a point of order , we have .
We now fix to be the maximal order of an element of . The exponent of a finite Abelian group is equal to the maximal order of its elements, so every element of has order dividing .
Looking at the long exact sequence in cohomology associated to the short exact sequence of sheaves
[TABLE]
shows that the natural map is injective. This identifies with the -torsion in , which contains . The Hochschild–Serre spectral sequence gives a short exact sequence
[TABLE]
in which the map induces a left inverse to . Thus is identified with a subgroup of , which is isomorphic to the -torsion in and so has order . Combining this with the above bound on gives the claimed bound. ∎
Corollary 2.5**.**
Under the conditions of Lemma 2.4, the order of is bounded by .
Proof.
If we blow down the line on we find a del Pezzo surface of degree , such that . So we see in Table 1 that . Corollary 2.3 gives an isomorphism . Combining this with Lemma 2.4 gives the bound for . ∎
Now we can prove the main theorem.
Proof of Theorem 1.1.
Let be a finite extension of such that at least one line on is defined over . The orbit-stabiliser theorem shows that we can always take no larger than the number of lines on . Since the maximal number of lines on a del Pezzo surface is , we find .
By Corollary 2.5 we have a bound on . On the other hand, the kernel of the morphism is contained in and hence bounded by by Proposition 2.1.
Combining these two bounds, we find that
[TABLE]
Remark*.*
There are, of course, many ways in which the constants appearing in this bound could be improved, especially if we were to separate the various different degrees. For example, the groups and are far from independent. Our interest here has been in showing the existence of a uniform bound, rather than in making that bound as small as possible.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] V. Cantoral-Farfán, Y. Tang, S. Tanimoto, and E. Visse. Effective bounds for Brauer groups of Kummer surfaces over number fields. ar Xiv:1606.06074, 2016.
- 2[2] J.-L. Colliot-Thélène and O. Wittenberg. Groupe de Brauer et points entiers de deux familles de surfaces cubiques affines. Amer. J. Math. , 134(5):1303–1327, 2012.
- 3[3] P. K. Corn. Del Pezzo surfaces and the Brauer-Manin obstruction . Pro Quest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2005. Thesis (Ph.D.)–University of California, Berkeley.
- 4[4] J. González-Sánchez, M. Harrison, I. Polo-Blanco, and J. Schicho. Algorithms for Del Pezzo surfaces of degree 5 (construction, parametrization). J. Symbolic Comput. , 47(3):342–353, 2012.
- 5[5] A. Grothendieck. Le groupe de Brauer. I. Algèbres d’Azumaya et interprétations diverses. In Dix exposés sur la cohomologie des schémas , volume 3 of Adv. Stud. Pure Math. , pages 46–66. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1968.
- 6[6] A. Grothendieck. Le groupe de Brauer. II. Théorie cohomologique. In Dix exposés sur la cohomologie des schémas , volume 3 of Adv. Stud. Pure Math. , pages 67–87. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1968.
- 7[7] A. Grothendieck. Le groupe de Brauer. III. Exemples et compléments. In Dix exposés sur la cohomologie des schémas , volume 3 of Adv. Stud. Pure Math. , pages 88–188. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1968.
- 8[8] Y. Harpaz. Geometry and arithmetic of certain log K 3 surfaces. Annales de l’Institut Fourier , to appear. ar Xiv:151101285.
