# Next Generation Virgo Cluster Survey. XXI. The weak lensing masses of   the CFHTLS and NGVS RedGOLD galaxy clusters and calibration of the optical   richness

**Authors:** Carolina Parroni, Simona Mei, Thomas Erben, Ludovic Van Waerbeke,, Anand Raichoor, Jes Ford, Rossella Licitra, Massimo Meneghetti, Hendrik, Hildebrandt, Lance Miller, Patrick C\^ot\'e, Giovanni Covone, Jean-Charles, Cuillandre, Pierre-Alain Duc, Laura Ferrarese, Stephen D. J. Gwyn, Thomas, H. Puzia

arXiv: 1705.04329 · 2017-11-08

## TL;DR

This study measures weak lensing masses for a large sample of galaxy clusters from optical surveys, calibrates the mass-richness relation, and compares it with X-ray derived masses to improve cluster mass estimates.

## Contribution

It provides the most comprehensive weak lensing analysis of a complete optical cluster catalog in a specific redshift range, including detailed modeling and calibration of mass proxies.

## Key findings

- Weak lensing masses are about 10% higher than X-ray masses.
- The mass-richness relation is well constrained and consistent with previous studies.
- Scaling relations between lensing mass and X-ray proxies are established.

## Abstract

We measured stacked weak lensing cluster masses for a sample of 1325 galaxy clusters detected by the RedGOLD algorithm in the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey W1 and the Next Generation Virgo Cluster Survey at $0.2<z<0.5$, in the optical richness range $10<\lambda<70$. After a selection of our best richness subsample ($20<\lambda<50$), this is the most comprehensive lensing study of a $\sim 100\%$ complete and $\sim 90\%$ pure optical cluster catalogue in this redshift range, with a total of 346 clusters in $\sim164~deg^2$. We test three different mass models, and our best model includes a basic halo model, with a Navarro Frenk and White profile, and correction terms that take into account cluster miscentering, non-weak shear, the two-halo term, the contribution of the Brightest Cluster Galaxy, and an a posteriori correction for the intrinsic scatter in the mass-richness relation. With this model, we obtain a mass-richness relation of $\log{M_{\rm 200}/M_{\odot}}=(14.48\pm0.04)+(1.14\pm0.23)\log{(\lambda/40)}$ (statistical uncertainties). This result is consistent with other published lensing mass-richness relations. When compared to X-ray masses and mass proxies, we find that on average weak lensing masses are $\sim 10\%$ higher than those derived in the X-ray in the range $2\times10^{13}M_{\rm \odot}<E(z) M^{X}_{\rm 200}<2\times10^{14}M_{\rm \odot}$, in agreement with most previous results and simulations. We also give the coefficients of the scaling relations between the lensing mass and X-ray mass proxies, $L_X$ and $T_X$, and compare them with previous results.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.04329/full.md

## Figures

20 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.04329/full.md

## References

123 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.04329/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.04329