# The Immitigable Nature of Assembly Bias: The Impact of Halo Definition   on Assembly Bias

**Authors:** Antonia S. Villarreal (1), Andrew R. Zentner (1), Yao-Yuan Mao (1),, Chris W. Purcell (2), Frank C. van den Bosch (3), Benedikt Diemer (4),, Johannes U. Lange (3), Kuan Wang (1), Duncan Campbell (3) ((1) U, Pittsburgh/PITT PACC, (2) RIT/CCRG, (3) Yale, (4) CfA/Harvard)

arXiv: 1705.04327 · 2022-07-22

## TL;DR

This study investigates how the definition of dark matter halos influences assembly bias, revealing that no single halo definition can eliminate all forms of assembly bias across different properties and mass ranges.

## Contribution

It systematically analyzes the dependence of assembly bias on halo definition, showing the complex and property-specific nature of mitigation strategies.

## Key findings

- Concentration-dependent clustering varies strongly with halo mass and definition.
- Adjusting halo definitions can reduce assembly bias for certain properties and mass ranges.
- No halo definition completely eliminates all forms of assembly bias.

## Abstract

Dark matter halo clustering depends not only on halo mass, but also on other properties such as concentration and shape. This phenomenon is known broadly as assembly bias. We explore the dependence of assembly bias on halo definition, parametrized by spherical overdensity parameter, $\Delta$. We summarize the strength of concentration-, shape-, and spin-dependent halo clustering as a function of halo mass and halo definition. Concentration-dependent clustering depends strongly on mass at all $\Delta$. For conventional halo definitions ($\Delta \sim 200\mathrm{m}-600\mathrm{m}$), concentration-dependent clustering at low mass is driven by a population of haloes that is altered through interactions with neighbouring haloes. Concentration-dependent clustering can be greatly reduced through a mass-dependent halo definition with $\Delta \sim 20\mathrm{m}-40\mathrm{m}$ for haloes with $M_{200\mathrm{m}} \lesssim 10^{12}\, h^{-1}\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$. Smaller $\Delta$ implies larger radii and mitigates assembly bias at low mass by subsuming altered, so-called backsplash haloes into now larger host haloes. At higher masses ($M_{200\mathrm{m}} \gtrsim 10^{13}\, h^{-1}\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$) larger overdensities, $\Delta \gtrsim 600\mathrm{m}$, are necessary. Shape- and spin-dependent clustering are significant for all halo definitions that we explore and exhibit a relatively weaker mass dependence. Generally, both the strength and the sense of assembly bias depend on halo definition, varying significantly even among common definitions. We identify no halo definition that mitigates all manifestations of assembly bias. A halo definition that mitigates assembly bias based on one halo property (e.g., concentration) must be mass dependent. The halo definitions that best mitigate concentration-dependent halo clustering do not coincide with the expected average splashback radii at fixed halo mass.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.04327/full.md

## Figures

13 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.04327/full.md

## References

114 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.04327/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.04327