Displayed Categories
Benedikt Ahrens, Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine

TL;DR
The paper introduces displayed categories as a flexible framework for understanding and formalizing fibrations and related concepts in category theory, especially within type-theoretic and formal proof environments.
Contribution
It formalizes displayed categories, providing a more natural and flexible approach to fibrations and related notions, facilitating formalization in proof assistants like Coq.
Findings
Displayed categories simplify the definition of fibrations without requiring equality on objects.
Most natural examples of fibrations can be represented as displayed categories.
The framework is implemented and formalized in Coq within the UniMath library.
Abstract
We introduce and develop the notion of *displayed categories*. A displayed category over a category C is equivalent to "a category D and functor F : D --> C", but instead of having a single collection of "objects of D" with a map to the objects of C, the objects are given as a family indexed by objects of C, and similarly for the morphisms. This encapsulates a common way of building categories in practice, by starting with an existing category and adding extra data/properties to the objects and morphisms. The interest of this seemingly trivial reformulation is that various properties of functors are more naturally defined as properties of the corresponding displayed categories. Grothendieck fibrations, for example, when defined as certain functors, use equality on objects in their definition. When defined instead as certain displayed categories, no reference to equality on objects…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
