# A solution for the paradox of the double-slit experiment

**Authors:** Gerrit Coddens

arXiv: 1705.04150 · 2017-05-12

## TL;DR

This paper offers a new interpretation of the double-slit experiment by emphasizing the role of undecidability and logical consistency in the wave function, resolving paradoxes in quantum probability calculations.

## Contribution

It introduces a logically consistent reformulation of the wave function contributions, clarifying the probabilistic interpretation and addressing the paradoxes of the double-slit experiment.

## Key findings

- The wave function contributions should be corrected to $	ext{psi'}_1$ and $	ext{psi'}_2$ for logical consistency.
- The corrected formulation aligns quantum probabilities with classical probability rules.
- Undecidability provides an intuitive understanding of quantum behavior and measurement.

## Abstract

We argue that the double-slit experiment can be understood much better by considering it as an experiment whereby one uses electrons to study the set-up rather than an experiment whereby we use a set-up to study the behaviour of electrons. We also show how the concept of undecidability can be used in an intuitive way to make sense of the double-slit experiment and the quantum rules for calculating coherent and incoherent probabilities. We meet here a situation where the electrons always behave in a fully deterministic way (following Einstein's conception of reality), while the detailed design of the set-up may render the question about the way they move through the set-up experimentally undecidable (which follows more Bohr's conception of reality). We show that the expression $\psi_{1} + \psi_{2}$ for the wave function of the double-slit experiment is numerically correct, but logically flawed. It has to be replaced in the interference region by the logically correct expression $\psi'_{1} + \psi'_{2}$, which has the same numerical value as $\psi_{1} + \psi_{2}$, such that $\psi'_{1} + \psi'_{2} = \psi_{1} + \psi_{2}$, but with $\psi'_{1} = {\psi_{1} +\psi_{2}\over{\sqrt{2}}} \,e^{\imath {\pi\over{4}}} \neq \psi_{1}$ and $\psi'_{2} = {\psi_{1} +\psi_{2}\over{\sqrt{2}}}\,e^{-\imath {\pi\over{4}}}\neq \psi_{2}$. Here $\psi'_{1}$ and $\psi'_{2}$ are the correct contributions from the slits to the total wave function $\psi'_{1} + \psi'_{2}$. We have then $p = |\psi'_{1} + \psi'_{2}|^{2} = |\psi'_{1}|^{2} + |\psi'_{2}|^{2} = p_{1}+p_{2} $ such that the paradox that quantum mechanics (QM) would not follow the traditional rules of probability calculus disappears.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.04150/full.md

## References

16 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.04150/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.04150