motivic cohomology of twisted
flag varieties
N.Yagita
faculty of Education,
Ibaraki University,
Mito, Ibaraki, Japan
[email protected],
Abstract.
In this paper, we study the mod(p) motivic cohomology of
twisted complete flag varieties over some restricted fields k. Here
we take the field k=R when p=2. When p is odd,
we take k such that the Milnor K-theory KiM(k)/p=0
for i>3.
Key words and phrases:
motivic cohomology, Rost motive, twisted flag variety
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:
55N20, 55R12, 55R40
1. Introduction
Let G be a simply connected compact Lie group
(and T its maximal torus).
For a field k⊂C,
let Gk be the corresponding split reductive group
over k and Tk its split torus. Let us write Gk a nontrivial
Gk-torsor. Then Gk/Bk is a (twisted form of) the complete
flag variety for a Borel subgoup Bk⊃Tk. Let us simply write by X the flag variety Gk/Bk.
We will study the motivic cohomology
H∗,∗′(X;Z/p) for twisted X.
For non-twisted cases, note that it is well known
[TABLE]
where 0=τ∈H0,1(Spec(kˉ);Z/p).
The cohomology H∗(G/T;Z/p) (for the topological flag
manifold) are completely known
by Toda, Watanabe, Nakagawa [Tod], [Tod-Wa], [Na].
In this paper, we give examples (which are the first for odd prime p) such that
the ring structures of H∗,∗′(X;Z/p) are computed
for twisted complete flag varieties X.
Petrov, Semenov and Zainoulline [Pe-Se-Za]
show that
the motive
M(X) of X is
decomposed as a sum of (degree changing)
generalized Rost motive R(Gk), namely,
[TABLE]
where T⊗s is the (degree changing) Tate motive.
Hence we can compute H∗,∗′(X;Z/p) additively if
H∗,∗′(R(Gk);Z/p) can be computed, while it is a difficult problem
in general cases. We say that a Lie group G is of type (I) if it is simply connected and H∗(G;Z/p) contains
only one even dimensional truncated polynomial
generator.
In this case,
R(Gk) is the original Rost motive R2 ([Ro1],[Vo1,4],[Su-Jo]) defined from
a pure symbol in the Milnor K-theory K3M(k)/p), and
their Chow groups are known ([Me-Su], [Ya1,4]). Moreover
we can compute also ring structure of CH∗(X)/p (see [Ya7]).
The motivic cohomology H∗,∗′(Rn;Z/p), of course,
depends on the field k. It is known for k=R and p=2.
Hence we can compute H∗,∗′(X;Z/2) in this case.
We also compute its ring structure (Theorem 6.7) by using the result
from [Ya7].
As an application, we study Barlmer’s Witt group
W∗(X) for k=R.
It seems no literature to compute H∗,∗′(Rn;Z/p) for an odd prime p. Hence we write down it
(Theorem 3.3)
when Kn+2M(k)/p=0. (Examples of such fields are
high dimensional local fields defined by K. Kato [Ka].)
Using these, we give the ring structure of H∗,∗′(X;Z/p) (Theorem 3.12) when
K4M(k)/p=0 (and of course K3M(k)/p=0).
We also compute the mod(p) algebraic cobordism
MGL∗,∗′(X;Z/p) for these fields k.
The plan of this paper is the following.
In §2, we recall the motives of flag varieties.
In §3, we compute H∗,∗′(Rn;Z/p) when
Kn+2M(k)/p=0, and compute H∗,∗′(X;Z/p)
for G is type (I). In §4, we study algebraic cobordism
version. In §5 we study the BP⟨n−1⟩∗-theory version,
which gives a short another proof for the result in §4.
In §6, we compute H∗,∗′(X)/2 when k=R, and
in §7, we study the Balmer Witt group W∗(X).
2. Lie groups and algebraic groups
Let p be a prime number and k field with k⊂C.
Let X be an algebraic variety over k such that
Xˉ=X⊗kkˉ is cellular for the algebraic
closure kˉ of k.
Let H∗,∗′(X;Z/p) (resp. CH∗(X)=CH∗(X)(p)) be the mod(p) motivic
cohomology (resp. Chow ring localized at p) over k.
Note that H∗,∗′(Xˉ;Z(p)) is torsion free, since Xˉ is cellular.
Let a be a pure symbol in the mod p Milnor K-theory
Kn+1M(k)/p. By Rost, we can
construct the norm variety Va of dim(Va)=pn−1 such that Vˉa≅vn is cellular (where vn is a generator of BP∗), and
a=0∈k∗M(k(Va))/p for the function filed k(Va) of Va.
Rost and Voevodsky showed that
there is y∈CHbn(Vˉa) for
bn=(pn−1)/(p−1) such that yp−1 is the fundamental class of Vˉa. We know
([Ro1], [Vo1,4], [Me-Su], [Ya4])
Theorem 2.1**.**
For a nonzero pure symbol a∈Kn+1M(k)/p,
there is an irreducible (Rost) motive Ra ( write by Rn
simply)
in the motive M(Va) of the norm variety Va
such that
\ CH^{*}(\bar{R}_{a})\cong{\mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}[y]/(y^{p}),\ and
[TABLE]
Here Mn(yi)=Z(p){c0(yi)}⊕Z/p{c1(yi),....,cn−1(yi)} with ∣cj(yi)∣=∣yi∣−2(pi−1),
where Z/p{a,b,...} is a Z-free module generate by
a,b,...
Let G be a simply connected compact Lie group
(and T its maximal torus)
and Gk be the corresponding split reductive group
over k and Tk its split torus. Let Gk be a nontrivial
Gk-torsor, and Gk/Bk the (twisted form of) complete
flag variety. Let us simply write by X the twisted flag variety Gk/Bk,
We are interesting in the motivic cohomology
H∗,∗′(X;Z/p). (For a Borel subgroup B⊃T,
note Gk/Bk is cellular and H∗,∗′(Gk/Bk;Z/p)≅H2∗(G/T;Z/p).)
We only consider here the cases
[TABLE]
where the degree are ∣y∣=even, and ∣xi∣=odd.
The following simple Lie groups satisfy
the above isomorphism ;
[TABLE]
We call that these (simply connected) groups G are of type (I).
It is known ℓ≥2(p−1).
There is a fibering
G→G/T→BT and the induced spectral sequence
(see for details, [Tod]. [To-Wa], [Mi-Ni], [Na])
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where S(t)=H∗(BT)≅Z(p)[t1,...,tℓ] with ∣ti∣=2. Then it is known ([Tod]) that
there is a regular sequence (b1,...,bℓ) in S(t)
such that d∣xi∣+1(xi)=bi for the differential in the spectral sequence.
Hence we can write
[TABLE]
Let us write
S(t)/(p,b1,...,bℓ) simply by S(t)/(b).
Theorem 2.2**.**
([Tod]) We have the ring isomorphism
[TABLE]
Petrov, Semenov and Zainoulline [Pe-Se-Za] prove that
when G is a group of type (I), the motive
M(X) (which is localized at p) is
decomposed as a sum of (degree changing) Rost motive R2, namely,
[TABLE]
where T⊗s is the (degree changing) Tate motive. Hence we easily see that
CH∗(⊕sT⊗s)/p≅S(t)/(b), and
[TABLE]
Hence additively
H∗,∗′(X;Z/p)≅H∗,∗′(R2;Z/2)⊗S(t)/(b).
In particular, we have additively
[TABLE]
On the other hand, the following additive isomorphism
is immediate
[TABLE]
where i,j,k range 1≤i,j≤2p−2<k≤ℓ.
We can take c1(yi)=b2i−1 and c0(yi)=b2i,
and prove the following theorem.
Theorem 2.3**.**
([Ya7])
Let G be a simple Lie group of type (I).
Let X=Gk/Tk for a nontrivial torsor Gk.
Then we have the ring isomorphism
[TABLE]
where i,j,k range 1≤i,j≤2(p−1)<k≤ℓ.
3. motivic cohomology of the Rost motive
Recall Va is a norm variety for a nonzero symbol a∈Kn+1∗(k).
Let χa=Cˇ(Va) be the Cech simplex sheaf for Va and
χ~a be the object defined by the cofibering
χ~→χ→pt in the stable A1-homotopy category.
By the solution of Bloch-Kato conjecture by Voevodsky, we see the exact sequence
[TABLE]
identifying H∗+1,∗+1(χa;Z/p)≅K∗+1M(k).
Since a=0∈Kn+1M(k(Va))/p, there is unique element
a′∈Hn+1,n(χa;Z/p) such that τa′=a.
Let Ma be the object in the derived category DM
of mixed motives [Vo2,4] defined by
the following distinguished triangle
[TABLE]
where bn=(pn−1)/(p−1)=pn−1+...+p+1
so that deg(δa)=(2bn+1,bn).
For i<p, define the symmetric powers
[TABLE]
where qi=(1/i!)∑σ∈Siσ
is a projector in DM, and σ
is the symmetric group of i letters.
One of the important results in [Vo2,4] Voevodsky proved is that
Map−1 is a direct summand of a motive of Va
(for details see [Vo2,4]).
This Map−1 is written by Ra (and is called the Rost
motive) in preceding sections.
Hence there are distinguished triangles ( (5.5),(5.6) in [Vo4])
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
For each prime p, we have the Milnor operation
[TABLE]
Let us write by Q(n) the exterior algebra
Λ(Q0,...,Q0). (We see QiQj=−QjQi for all p and
Qi2=0 also for p=2.)
Theorem 3.1**.**
(Theorem 8.5 in [Ya4])
Let 0=a=(a0,...,an)∈Kn+1M(k)/p. Then
there is a K∗M(k)⊗Q(n)-modules isomorphism
[TABLE]
where ξa=QnQn−1....Q0(a′) and deg(a′)=(n+1,n).
By using the above theorem we have Theorem 2.1
in §2.
Corollary 3.2**.**
Let ci=Q0...Q^i...Qn−1(a′) (hence ∣ci∣=2(bn−pi+1)).
Then
there is the additive isomorphism
[TABLE]
where deg(t)=(2bn,bn).
Remark. Note that ti is a vertical element, i.e.,
ti itself does not exist in CH∗(Map−1)/p but cjti exists.
Let K1M(k)/p be finite, e.g.,
generated by a1,...,am. When p is odd,
K∗M/p is isomorphic
to a quotient of the exterior algebra Λ(a1,...,am).
So KiM(k)/p=0 for all i>m.
Hereafter we consider some ease cases such that K∗M(k)/p=0 for ∗>n+1
and hence K∗M(k)/(Ker(a))=Z/p.
Let us write
H∗,∗′=H∗,∗′(Spec(k);Z/p)≅K∗M(k)/p[τ]
and
[TABLE]
We assume that a primitive p2-th root of unity exists
in k, that is each primitive p-th root ζp is zero
in K1M(k)/p. Hence we see
[TABLE]
We have the additive structure of H∗,∗′(Map−1;Z/p)≅H∗,∗′(Rn;Z/p) by the following theorem.
Theorem 3.3**.**
Let k contain a primitive p2-th root of the unity.
Let a∈Kn+1(k)/p be a nonzero pure
symbol, and K∗M(k)/p=0 for ∗>n+1.
Then there is an additive isomorphism
[TABLE]
where Q~(n−1)=Q(n−1)−Z/p{Q0...Qn−1}.
Recall that Het∗(X;Z/p)≅H∗,∗(X;Z/p).
Since τt∈H~∗,∗′{t} and τQi(a′)=Qi(a)=0, we can see
Corollary 3.4**.**
We have Het∗(Rn;Z/p)≅K∗M(k)[t]/(p,tp).
This fact itself is easily seen from Het∗(χa;Z/p)≅Het∗(pt.;Z/p).
Let us write by H~et∗(Rn;Z/p) the same ring
Het∗(Rn;Z/p)≅K∗M(k)[t]/(tp) with deg(t)=(2bn,bn)
(but not (2bn,2bn)).
Corollary 3.5**.**
We have the exact sequence
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
For ease of notations, for x∈H∗,∗′(Y;Z/p),
let us write by f.deg(x)=∗, and s.deg(x)=∗′,
and define
[TABLE]
Then it is well known ([Vo1,2]) that if Y is smooth and
0=x∈H∗,∗′(Y;Z/p), then
0≤w(x) and 0≤d(x)≤dim(Y).
Remark.
Let us consider the following triangular domain
in Z×Z generated by bidegree (∗,∗′)
[TABLE]
and D′=∪j=1p−1Dj′.
Then we know in Lemma 8.7 in [Ya4] the following
fact. Let us write K=K∗M(k), aK=Ker(a)) in K and Ka=K/Ka. Then for bidegree (∗,∗′)∈D′
defined above,
we have the K-module isomorphism,
[TABLE]
So the above isomorphism shows the preceding theorem
when (∗,∗′)∈D′, since K≅H∗,∗′ in D′.
To prove the above theorem, we need some lemmas and arguments. Let us assume that p is an odd prime (p=2 case is proved similarly). Let us write
χa (resp. Mai,δa,ξa) by simply
χ (resp. Mi,δ,ξ).
Define
[TABLE]
so that H∗,∗′(Y;Z/p)=∑i=−1∞Di(Y)
and Di∩Dj=0 for i=j.
Note ∣ξ∣=2bn+1=2pbn.
To see arguments
easily, here we use notations that
\begin{CD}@>{D_{i}}>{a_{i}}>or@>{a_{i}}>{D_{i}}>\end{CD}
simply means ai∈Di, e.g.,
[TABLE]
From Theorem 3.1 and
K∗M(k)/Ker(a))≅Z/p, we have
Di(χ)≅Di+pm(χ) for i≥1,
and Di(χ)=0 only
if i=−1,0 mod(p).
On the other hand, when Y=Mp−1, we see
Di=0 for i≥p−1
[TABLE]
We first compute H∗(M;Z/p).
Consider the exact sequence induced from (3.3)
[TABLE]
Hence we have the isomorphism
[TABLE]
The map δ:χ→χ(bn)[2bn+1] in DM
is given by
the cup product x↦x∪δ for an element
δ∈H2bn∗1,bn(χ;Z(p)). In fact, we note
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Note that from Qi2=0, the map multiplying δ=Qn−1...Q0(a′) is a Q(n−1)-module map,
while is not a Qn-map.
Lemma 3.6**.**
In H∗,∗′(χ;Z/p), we have
δ⋅Qn(a′)=ξ⋅a′.
Proof.
We have
[TABLE]
So δ⋅Qn(a′)=ξ⋅a′+Qn(b) for some b since H∗,∗′(χ~;Z/p) is Q(n)-free.
But b=∑λJQJ(a′) for some λJ∈Z/p
and QJ∈Q(n−1). Since ∣b∣=∣δa′∣,
we see λ=0∈Z/p.
∎
The map ×δ:H∗,∗′(χ;Z/p)→H∗,∗′(χ;Z/p) is written as the following
[TABLE]
which is not a commutative diagram, and it means only
δ⋅1=δ, δ⋅a′=0, δ⋅δ=0, .., δ⋅Qn(a′)=a′ξ,…
Recall that Q(n−1){a′}/δ≅Q~(n−1){a′}. We also recall
δ⋅Q(n−1)Qn{a′}≅Q(n−1){a′ξ}
from the above lemma.
Using these, we can compute
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where t is a vertical element with deg(t)=(2bn,bn).
We can write H∗,∗′(M;Z/p) as
[TABLE]
Here note Qn−1...Q0(Qn(a′))=ξ.
Lemma 3.7**.**
We have the isomorphism
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Next, we compute H∗,∗(Mi;Z/p) for 1<i<p−1.
We consider the long exact sequence
induced from (3.4)
[TABLE]
Recall that Dj(χ)=0 for j=−1,0 mod(p).
Hence
[TABLE]
The element ri∗ is represented by an element in H2bni+1,bni(Mi−1;Z/p) from
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Hence H∗,∗(Mi;Z/p)≅Coker(ri∗)⊕Ker(ri∗){ti}. We first study in the case i=2<p−1.
Note that the map ×δt=×Qn−1...Q0(a′t) is a Q(n−1)-module map.
Lemma 3.8**.**
we have r2∗(1)=δt
and r2∗(Qn(a′))=a′tξ. (I.e. δtQn(a′)=a′tξ.)
Proof.
By the exact sequence, we know
[TABLE]
Therefore if 0=δt∈H∗,∗′(M2;Z/p), then so is in H∗,∗′(Mp−1;Z/p) which is a sub-motive of Va.
This is a contradiction, since
w(δ)=(2s.deg−f.deg)(δ)=−1<0.
The case r2∗(Qn(a′) is proved similarly, by using
w(a′ξ)<0.
∎
Remark. This lemma is immediate consequence
from Lemma 3.5, if t exists, however, which is not correct.
The map r2∗:H∗,∗′(χ;Z/p)→H∗,∗′(M;Z/p) is given as follows
[TABLE]
Using this lemma, we can compute
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
For Y=M2, we see
[TABLE]
Thus we get H∗,∗′(M2;Z/p).
By using induction for 0≤i≤p−3, we have H∗,∗′(Mp−2;Z/p)
also. We have H∗,∗′(Mp−2;Z/p)
[TABLE]
Lemma 3.9**.**
We have the isomorphism
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
At last we compute H∗,∗′(Mp−1;Z/p)
by using the exact sequence induced from (3.3) for i=p−1
and the following lemma. In particular
Ker(rp−1∗){tp−1}≅H~∗,∗′{tp−1}.
Lemma 3.10**.**
The map rp−1∗ is given by
1↦δtp−2,
[TABLE]
Proof.
All elements in the right hand side in the above maps
must disappear in H∗,∗′(Mp−1).
For example,
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
∎
Remark. There seems a relation something like
δ⋅(δtp−2)=ξ.
The map rp−1∗:H∗,∗′(χ;Z/p)→H∗,∗′(Mp−2;Z/p) is given as follows
[TABLE]
where 1≤i≤p−3.
The map rp−1∗ is injective only except
for H∗,∗′{1} (namely for ∗>n+1).
We see that Ker(rp−1∗)≅H~∗,∗′tp−1.
Then we have H∗,∗′(Mp−1)≅Coker(rp−1∗)⊕H∗,∗′tp−1. So we have proved Theorem 3.3.
Lemma 3.11**.**
Let b=Qn−1...Q1(a′ti−1)
in H∗,∗′(Mp−1;Z/p). Then b can be lift to
the element
H∗,∗′(Mp−1;Z/p2) with
b=pti.
Proof.
Recall the exact sequence
[TABLE]
The element hti∈H∗,∗′(Mi;Z/p) is defined by
δi∗(hti)=h when ri∗(hti−1)=δti−1h=0.
Since δti−1 is the Q0-image, we know pδti−1=0 in
H∗,∗′(Mi;Z/p2). Hence there is an element
pti∈H∗(Mi;Z/p2), which is Z/p2-module generator (since ti itself does not exist).
So pti represents nonzero element in H∗,∗′(Mi;Z/p).
On the other hand, from Theorem 3.3, we see H2bni,bni(Mi;Z/p)≅Z/p{b}. Hence we can take pti=b.
∎
Let G be a Lie group of type (I) and X=Gk/Bk.
Using the case n=2, we see that
H∗.∗′(X;Z/p) is additively isomorphic to
[TABLE]
Here we have Q0(a′yi−1)=b2i, Q1(a′yi−1)=b2i−1.
By the preceding lemma, we can take the i-th product yi in H∗,∗′(Xˉ;Z/p) as the additive
generator ti in H∗,∗′(Mˉp−1;Z/p)≅Z/p[y]/(yp).
Theorem 3.12**.**
Let k be a field in Theorem 3.3.
Let G be a group of type of (I),
and X=Gk/Bk be a twisted flag variety.
Then H∗,∗′(X;Z/p) is isomorphic to the
H∗,∗′-subalgebra generated by
[TABLE]
in H∗,∗′[1,a′,y]⊗S(t)/(R1′,R2′,R3′) where
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Proof.
The relation R1 holds, since so does in CH∗(X).
Since K+M(k)a=0, we have K+M(k)a′=0 by using (3.3). Then we have
[TABLE]
We also have
τbi=τQi(a′)=Qi(τa′)=Qi(a)=0.
Since f.deg(a′)=3, we have (a′)2=0 for p odd,
and so bia′=Qi(a′)a′=1/2Qi((a′)2)=0.
When p=2, we have a2=aρ=0, and
bia′=0 from ∣bia′∣>∣y∣.
Thus we have R2.
For R3, we only see the last element. We have
in CH∗(X)/p
[TABLE]
Therefore from R2, we see H~∗,∗′yp=0.
∎
Corollary 3.13**.**
We have an isomorphism
[TABLE]
Remark.
As examples of the fields satisfying the assumption of
Theorem 3.3,
we can take the high dimensional local fields defined by Kato and
Parsin.
Let k be a complete discrete valuation field with residue field F.
Then it is well known that
[TABLE]
Let k0 be a finite field, and let k1,...,kn be the sequence
of complete discrete valuation fields such that the residue field of
ki is ki−1 for each 1≤i≤n. Then the field k=kn obtained
in this way is called an n-dimensional local field
(see [Ka]). Then
[TABLE]
4. Ah∗,∗′(Y)=ABP∗,∗′(Y;Z/p)
In this section, we study the algebraic cobordism
for the field k with Kn+2M(k)/p=0.
Moreover we assume that k contains a p2-th root of the unity.
Throughout this section,
we assume the above k,p, that is,
[TABLE]
.
Let Y be a smooth algebraic variety over k.
We study the BP version
of the algebraic cobordism
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
defined by Voevodsky and Levine-Morel
([Vo1], [Le-Mo1,2], [Ya1,4]), with the coefficient ring
BP∗=Z(p)[v1,v2,...],
where ∣vn∣=−2(pn−1).
The Chow ring CH∗(Y) is written as a quotient of Ω∗(Y)
([Vo1],[Le-Mo1,2]) that is,
[TABLE]
Let us write by ABP∗,∗′(Y;Z/p) the mod p
ABP-theory so that
[TABLE]
and ABP2∗,∗(Y;Z/p)≅Ω2∗(Y)/p.
We simply write
[TABLE]
Lemma 4.1**.**
If n+1≤2p−1, then Ah∗,∗′(pt.)≅H∗,∗′⊗BP∗
where pt.=Spec(k) and H∗,∗′=H∗,∗′(pt.;Z/p).
Proof.
Consider the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence
[TABLE]
It is known the first (possible) non zero differential is
[TABLE]
Here H∗,∗′=0 for ∗>n+1 from the assumption for k.
Recall H0,i(pt.;Z/p) is generated by τi.
When p is odd, Qi is a derivation. and we see
Q1(τi)=0 since Q1(τ)=0. For p=2,
we have Q1(τ2)=ρ3 (Lemma 6.3 in [Ya1]).
Since ρ=−1=0∈K1M(k)/2, we see d3=0.
Hence assumption of this lemma, this spectral sequence
collapses.
∎
Hereafter this section we assume that
k is a field k∗M(k)/p≅0 for ∗>n+1 and
2p−1>n+1 and ζp2∈k.
Therefore h∗,∗′(X) is an H∗,∗′⊗BP∗-algebra in this case.
Remark. When p=2 and k=R, the algebra
Ah∗,∗′(Spec(R)) is quite complicated
([Ya1]).
For smooth Y1,Y2 and θ∈Ah2∗,∗(Y1×Y2) for ∗=dim(Y2), we can define
[TABLE]
where pri:Y1×Y2→Yi is the i-th projection.
For the projector p (i.e., p=fθ with p⋅p=p),
we can define the motive M=(Y,p) with
Ah∗,∗′(M)=p⋅Ah∗,∗′(Y). Thus we have the category
Ah-motives.
Lemma 4.2**.**
For smooth Y and a motive M⊂M(Y), we have
the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence
[TABLE]
Proof.
(See Lemma 7.1 in [Ya4].)
We only need to see that drfθ=fθdr
for the differential dr in the spectral sequence.
For θ∈CH∗(Y×Y)/p⊂Ah2∗,∗(Y×Y), we have
[TABLE]
The last equation follows dr(θ)=0, since w(θ)=0.
We know (e.g. §5 in [Ya])
[TABLE]
where ThY(1)∈H2m,m(ThY(V);Z/p)
is the Thom class for some
bundle V over Y and i:Tm×Y⊂ThY(V)×Y. Since w(ThY(1))=0,
we see
dr(ThY(1)⋅x)=ThY(1)⋅dr(x).
Therefore pr2∗ commutes with dr.
Hence so does fθ.
∎
For the Rost motive Rn, we will study the
Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence
[TABLE]
From Theorem 3.3, we still have
[TABLE]
where Q~(n−1)=Q(n−1)−Z/p{Q0...Qn−1}.
Lemma 4.3**.**
The nonzero differential dr in AHss (∗)
has the form
[TABLE]
The proof of this lemma will give just before Corollary 4.8 below.
Lemma 4.4**.**
Let ci=Q0...Q^i...Qn−1(a′) and
[TABLE]
Then the infinity term in the AHss (∗) is written as
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let us write Q(i)′=Λ(Qi,...,Q1).
For x∈Q~(n−1), considering that Q0 is contained in x or not,
we have the decomposition
[TABLE]
Considering Qn−1 is contained in x or not
for x∈Q~(n−1)′, we have
[TABLE]
Continuing this argument, we can see that
[TABLE]
For a BP∗⊗Q(n−1)′-module B, let us write
E0(B)=B and Er+1(B)=H(Er(B);vr⊗Qr).
Then we easily see by induction on j
[TABLE]
Hence we see that
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Therefore we get
[TABLE]
From Lemma 4.3, all differential are of the forms d2pi−1=vi⊗Qi (in particular dr(BP∗⊗H~∗,∗′yj)=0), we have this lemma.
∎
We recall the following lemma to see the relations
between ci in Ah∗,∗′(Rn).
Lemma 4.5**.**
(Corollary 3.4 in [Ya4])
Let x∈CH∗(Y)≅E∞2∗,∗,0 and vsx=0 in E∞2∗,∗,∗′ for the
AHss converging to ABP∗,∗′(Y).
Then there is b∈H∗,∗′(Y;Z/p) with
Qs(b)=x and a relation in ABP2∗,∗(Y)
[TABLE]
with xk=Qk(b) in H2∗,∗(Y;Z/p) for all k≥s.
Corollary 4.6**.**
In ABP2∗,∗(Rn), we have
vicj=vjci mod(I∞2). The restriction map
Res(ci)=viy mod(I∞2) in ABP2∗,∗(Rˉn).
Proof.
First note that
ci exists in (the integral) ABP2∗,∗(Rn), since ci
exists in H2∗,∗(R2) (considering the integral AHss).
Let i>0. Since pci=0 in the spectral sequence
there is x∈H∗,∗′(R2) such that
Q0x=ci and there is a relation
[TABLE]
By the dimensional reason, we see x=Qn−1...Q^i..Q1(a′). Hence the above equation is written as
[TABLE]
since Qix=Q1...Qn−1(a′)=c0.
From lemma 3.11, we know Res(c0)=py mod(p2,BP<0).
So Res(ci)=viy since ABP∗,∗′(Rˉn) is BP∗-free. The first relation is proved similarly
by using vjci=0 j<i in the spectral sequence.
∎
Theorem 4.7**.**
We have an isomorphism
[TABLE]
Proof.
We have an isomorphism
[TABLE]
Therefore we get the result
from Lemma 4.4 and Lemma 4.6.
∎
Proof of Lemma 4.3.
For an element x=Qi...Q1Q0(a′) in E2pi, the next nonzero
differential is d2pi+1−1. Otherwise
[TABLE]
But by dimensional reason, there does not exist
nonzero x such that ∣x∣<∣x′∣<∣x∣+∣Qi+1∣.
The elements H~∗,∗′(tj) is generated
as a BP∗⊗H∗,∗′-algebra by τtj and
btj for b∈K1M(k)/p. Since
w(btj)=1, the differential image w(dr(bti))=0.
Hence dr(btj)∈⊕i,kBP∗/Ii{citk}.
But if dr(btj)=0, then it contradicts to
the existence of the restriction map gr(Res) in the proof of Theorem 4.7.
At last we consider τt.
Since τb1ti=0 in the spectral sequence,
τb1ti=vc for v∈BP<0 in Ah∗,∗′(Rn).
Restrict it to Ah∗,∗′(Rˉn), we have τv1ti+1=v(c∣kˉ). Since Ah∗,∗′(Rˉn)
is BP∗/p[τ]-free, we see v=v1 and c∣kˉ=τti+1. This means that τti+1 exists in Ah∗,∗′(Rn), and it is a permanent cycle.
∎
Corollary 4.8**.**
The motivic cobordism Ah∗,∗′(Rn) is isomorphic
to the Ah∗,∗′-submodule of
Ah∗,∗′[t]/(tp) (for Ah∗,∗′≅BP∗⊗H∗,∗′) generated by
[TABLE]
We consider here the another cobordism theory
[TABLE]
so that
Ak∗,∗′≅BP⟨n−1⟩⊗H∗,∗′≅Z/p[v1,...,vn−1]⊗H∗,∗′.
In this case, we note In≅k~∗=BP⟨n−1⟩∗−Z/p{1}. Hence we can see
Corollary 4.9**.**
The motivic cobordism Ak∗,∗′(Rn) is isomorphic
to the Ak∗,∗′-submodule of
Ak∗,∗′[t]/(tp) (for Ak∗,∗′≅BP⟨n−1⟩∗⊗H∗,∗′) generated by
[TABLE]
where A~k∗,∗′=Ak∗,∗′−Z/p.
In the next section, we give an another short proof for this fact but assuming some properties for Ak-motives.
Proposition 4.10**.**
Let G be a group of type of I.
Let X=Gk/Bk be a twisted flag variety.
Then there is a filtration such that grAh∗,∗′(X) is isomorphic to the
BP∗⊗H∗,∗′-subalgebra generated by
[TABLE]
in BP∗⊗H∗,∗′[y]/(yp)⊗S(t)/(R1,R2′′) where
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Note that τb2i−1=0 in AHss, but
τb2i−1=v1τy in Ak∗,∗′(X).
Define the etale cobordism theory by
Ahet∗(Y)=limN(τNAh∗,∗′(Y)).
Corollary 4.11**.**
We have the isomorphism
[TABLE]
Recall that AK(n)∗,∗′(Y) be the motivic Morava
K-theory such that
[TABLE]
Corollary 4.12**.**
Suppose the same assumption for
X,k as Theorem 4.10. Then we have
[TABLE]
where R1K=(b2i,bk∣1≤i≤p−1, 2p−1≤k≤ℓ)
and
[TABLE]
Proof.
In Ah∗,∗′(X), we have τb1=τv1y. (Note
τy exists in Ah∗,∗′(X), but y itself does not.)
Let new y=v1−1b1 in AK(1)∗,∗′(X). Then we have
b2i−1=v1yi=v1(v1−1b1)i in AK(1)∗,∗′(X).
Of course it holds for this y that hb1=hv1y for h∈H~∗,∗′.
∎
Recall
grK(1)∗(G/T)≅K(1)∗[y]/(yp)⊗S(t)/(b).
Here b2i−1=v1yi, in particular, y=v1−1b1
in K(1)∗(G/T). Thefore we see
[TABLE]
Hence AK(1)∗,∗′(X)≅H∗,∗′⊗K(1)∗(G/T).
The graded algebra associated to the gamma filtration
of the (topological mod K-theory) K∗(G/T;Z/p) is given ([Ya6])
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
The associated graded algebra in the above corollary
gives more strong information for the gamma filtration
than gr(1)γ∗(X). For example, from
b12=0∈gr(1)γ∗(X), we see
b12∈Fγ2∣b1∣+2, but from
b12=v1b3∈gr(K(1)∗(X)),
we see
[TABLE]
5. Ak∗,∗′(Y)=ABP⟨n−1⟩∗,∗′(Y;Z/p)
Throughout this section,
we assume
[TABLE]
as the preceding section.
In algebraic topology, BP⟨m⟩∗(Y) is the cohomology theory
with the coefficient ring BP⟨m⟩∗=Z(p)[v1,...,vm].
Let us write
[TABLE]
Hence Ak∗,∗′(pt)≅H∗,∗′[v1,...,vn−1].
In this section we compute Ak∗,∗′(Rn)
assuming the existence of some category of
Ak∗.∗′-motives. The result
is get quite easily,
and of course, coincides with Corollary 4.9.
For ease of notations, hereafter this section, we simply write
[TABLE]
Lemma 5.1**.**
We have Ak∗,∗′(χ)≅Ak∗,∗′⊕Ak∗,∗′(χ~), and
[TABLE]
where c=Qn−1...Q1(a′), δ=Q0c and ξ′=Qn(c),Q0(ξ′)=ξ.
Proof.
We consider AHss
[TABLE]
Here H∗,∗′(χ~;Z/p)≅Q(n){a′}⊗Z/p[ξ].
We consider the decomposition
[TABLE]
We easily see all differentials are of form d2pr−1(x)=vr⊗Qr(x). Hence we have
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Here we used
BP⟨n−1⟩∗/In≅Z/p[v1,...,vn−1]/(v1,...,vn−1)≅Z/p.
∎
Elements 1,δ′,δ,ξ′,ξ in Ak∗,∗′(χ) are contained in Di as follows
[TABLE]
Recall the category
Ak-motives in the preceding section.
More strongly, we assume
Assumption 5.2**.**
There is a triangular category DM(Ak)
which contains
the category of Ak-motives
such that for X∈DM(Ak), we can define Ak∗,∗′(X),
and
for a cofibering X→Y→Z in DM(Ak), we have
the induced exact sequence
[TABLE]
Moreover, χ is an object of DM(Ak)
and
[TABLE]
From the assumption we can define
the map δ:χ→χ(∗′)[∗]
in the category DM(Ak).
We still know δQn(a′)=a′ξ, which induces
δξ′=cξ.
The map ×δ:Ak∗,∗′(χ;Z/p)→Ak∗,∗′(χ;Z/p) is written as
[TABLE]
We ca easily see
Coker(δ)≅Ak∗,∗′⊕Z/p{c}⊕Z/p[ξ]{ξ′,ξ}, and
[TABLE]
Lemma 5.3**.**
We have the isomorphism
[TABLE]
Next, we compute Ak∗,∗(Mi;Z/p) for 1<i<p−1.
As lemma 3.9, we can compute
Lemma 5.4**.**
We have the isomorphism
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
At last we compute Ak∗,∗′(Mp−1).
Recall Lemma 3.9 and the map rp−1∗ is given in H∗,∗′(Mp−2;Z/p)
by
[TABLE]
Hence, in Ak∗,∗′(Mp−2), we have
1↦δtp−2 c↦ξ′, δ↦ξ, ξ′↦cξ, ξ↦δtp−2ξ.
The map rp−1∗ is given as follows.
[TABLE]
Note that Ker(rp−1∗){t}≅A~k∗,∗′tp−1.
Using these, we see the following theorem with Assumption 5.2, while it also follows from Corollary 4.9 (without Assumption 5.2).
Theorem 5.5**.**
We have the isomorphism
[TABLE]
Remark.
When Ak∗,∗′(X)=ABP⟨n⟩∗,∗′(X), we see that
δa does not exist in Ak∗,∗′(χ). Hence we can not
do the above arguments.
6. motivic cohomology over R
When p=2, important cases have the property
with K∗M(k)/2=0 for all ∗≥0.
Let R be the field of real numbers.
Let ρ=−1∈K1M(R)/2≅R×/(R×)2. Then it is well known
[TABLE]
Hence the motivic cohomology is given as
[TABLE]
where 0=τ∈H0,1(Spec(R))/2.
Let a=ρn+1∈Kn+1M(R)/2. Since K∗M(R)/Ker(a)≅Z/2[ρ], we have
from Theorem 3.1
[TABLE]
where ξ=δa2. Note Het∗(χa;Z/2)≅Het∗(R;Z/2)≅Z/2[ρ].
Lemma 6.1**.**
Let Qϵ=Q0ϵ0...Qn−1ϵn−1 for
ϵ=(ϵ0,...,ϵn−1) with ϵi=0 or 1.
Then H∗(χa;Z/2)[τ,τ−1]≅Z/2[ρ,τ,τ−1], and we have
[TABLE]
where d(ϵ)=∑iϵi2i and f(ϵ)=∑iϵi(2i+1−1).
Proof.
By definition, we see Q0τ=ρ. The Q0 action is a derivative and we have
[TABLE]
hence Q0(τ−1)=ρτ−2.
We have Q1(τ−1)=ρ3τ−3
by using that the coproduct ψ is given (Proposition 13.4 in [Vo])
[TABLE]
Similarly, we can prove the lemma (for details see proof of
Lemma 4.6 in [Ya]).
∎
Lemma 6.2**.**
The motivic cohomology
H∗,∗′(χa;Z/2) has no τ-torsion elements
and, it is the Z/2[ρ,τ]-submodule
of Z/2[ρ,τ,τ−1] generated by
[TABLE]
Proof.
We can define a Q(n−1)-module map j:H∗(χa;Z/2)→Z/2[ρ,τ,τ−1] by j(a′)=τ−1ρn+1 and so
j(Qϵ(a′))=τ−d(ϵ)−1ρf(ϵ)+n+1. This map is injective
from (∗) and Q(n)=Λ(Qn)⊗Q(n−1)
is Q(n−1)-free.
In fact Qϵ(a′) generate free Z/2[ρ]-modules
in Z/2[ρ,τ,τ−1].
∎
Lemma 6.3**.**
We have δa′=Qn(a′) and δQn(a′)=a′ξ.
Proof.
The first equation follows from the fact that
H∗,∗′(χ~;Z/2) is a Q(n−1)-free and
[TABLE]
Then δQn(a′)=δ2a′=ξa′.
∎
The map ×δ:H∗,∗′(χ;Z/2)→H∗,∗′(χ;Z/2) is written as
[TABLE]
Theorem 6.4**.**
(Theorem 1.3 in [Ya2]) The motivic cohomology
H∗,∗′(Rn;Z/2) is isomorphic to the Z/2[ρ,τ]-subalgebra of
[TABLE]
generated by 1, Qϵ(a′)=τd(ϵ)−1ρf(ϵ)+n+1.
Corollary 6.5**.**
We have the Z/2[ρ,τ]-module isomorphism
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
identifying a′=τ−1ρ3, Q0a′=τ−2ρ4,
Q1a′=τ−3ρ6.
Corollary 6.6**.**
We have a Z/2[τ]-module isomorphism
[TABLE]
The following theorem is shown for G=G2 in
Corollary 5.5 in [Ya3].
Theorem 6.7**.**
Let X=Gk/Bk for G of type (I).
Then we have the isomorphism
for ∗≥∗′
[TABLE]
where R1=(bibj,bk∣1≤i,j≤2<k<ℓ),
R2=(ρ7,ρ3b1,ρb2) and
[TABLE]
Proof.
In H∗,∗′(X;Z/2), the relation R1 also holds
since so does in CH∗(X)/2≅H2∗,∗(X;Z/2).
By dimensional reason, we can take
b1=Q0a′+λt for 0=t∈S(t)/(b) and λ∈Z. Since b1∣C=Q0a′∣C=0
but t∣C=0, we have λ=0∈Z/2.
Similarly we can take Q1a′=b2. Hence R2 also
holds in H∗,∗′(X;Z/2). We can take a′ satifying R3 from H∗,∗′(R2;Z/2).
Hence we have the Z/2[ρ]-algebra map
[TABLE]
When ∗≥∗′, this map is additively isomorphic from Petrov-Semenov-Zainoulline theorem. So is isomorphic as
Z/2[ρ]-algebra map.
∎
Corollary 6.8**.**
We have the Z/2[ρ]-algebra isomorphism
[TABLE]
where R2′=(ρ7,ρ4=b1,ρ6=b2).
Consider the Borel spectral sequence
[TABLE]
Here H∗(BZ/2;Z/2)≅Z/2[ρ]
and Het∗(Gk/Tk;Z/2)≅Z/2[y]/(y2)⊗S(t)/(b). The element
y is not a permanent cycle of this spectral sequence.
We can see d7(y)=ρ7 and
[TABLE]
This term becomes E∞-term and
grHet∗(Gk/Bk;Z/2)≅E8∗,∗′.
Of course, this fact coincide
the above corollary by b1=ρ4 and b2=ρ6
in Het∗(X;Z/2).
7. Witt groups.
For a smooth variety Y over a field k with 1/2∈k,
let W(Y)
denote the Witt group of Y. Balmer defined the periodic Witt group
Wi(Y)≅Wi+4(Y), (i∈Z)
with W0(X)=W(Y) (see for details, [Ba-Wa]).
Balmer and Walter [Ba-Wa] define the Gersten-Witt complex
[TABLE]
Let H∗(W(Y)) denote the cohomology group of the above cochain complex,
with W(k(Y)) places in degree [math]. From the above complex, we have the
(Balmer-Walter) spectral sequence
[TABLE]
By the affirmative answer of the Milnor conjecture of quadratic forms
by Orlov-Vishik-Voevodsky [Or-Vi-Vo], we have the isomorphism of graded rings
H∗(k(x);Z/2)≅grW∗(k(x)).
Using this fact, Pardon and Gille ([Pa],[Gi],[To]) defined the spectral sequence
[TABLE]
so that the differential dr has degree (1,r−1) for r≥2.
Here HZ/2s is the Zariski sheaf induced from the
presheaf Hets(V;Z/2) for open subset V of Y.
The above sheaf cohomology
HZarr(Y;HZ/2s) relates the motivic cohomology H∗,∗′(Y;Z/2).
Indeed, we get the long exact sequence from the
solution of Beilinson-Lichtenbaum conjecture
by Voevodsky [Or-Vi-Vo]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Therefore, we have
Lemma 7.1**.**
E(GP)2m−n,n≅HZarm−n(Y;HZ/2n)≅**
[TABLE]
In particular,
E(GP)2m,m≅H2m,m(Y;Z/2)≅CHm(Y)/2,
and E(GP)2m,m+1≅H2m+1,m+1(Y;Z/2).
Moreover Totaro proved
Lemma 7.2**.**
(Totaro [To])
If x∈E(GP)2∗,∗, then d2(x)=Sq2(x).
Many examples ([Ya2,5]
satisfy the following assumption.
Assumption 7.3**.**
If x∈E(GP)2∗,∗+1,
then d2(x)=Sq2(x).
It is known that the Witt group is written as the motivic
Hermitian K-theory by Schlichting and Tripathi [Sc-Tr], namely, Wi(Y)≅KOi+∗,∗(Y) for i>∗.
Hence W∗(X) has the multiplicative structure.
In particular, we can see [Ya5] that the differentials in the both spectral sequences E(GP)r and E(BW)r are derivations.
Now we consider the cases Y=X=G/Bk.
At first, we recall the case Xˉ.
Let us write H(Y;Sq2)=Ker(d)/Im(d) the homology with the differential
d=Sq2 on H∗(Y;Z/2). We give dgree of x∈H(Y;Sq2) by half of the degree ∣x∣∈H∗(Y;Z/2).
Theorem 7.4**.**
([Ya5], [Zi])
There is an isomorphism
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where deg(y)=1/2∣y∣=3 and all deg(zi) are odd.
It is known (Theorem 5.11 in [Ya2]) that there is an open
variety Ua in some quadric Q such that
Ra⊂M(Q) and
H∗,∗′(Ua;Z/2)≅H∗,∗′(Ra;Z/2).
So we write by W∗(Ra) the Witt group W∗(Ua).
Lemma 7.5**.**
*If Assumption 7.3 is satisfied, then
grW∗(R2)≅Z/2{1,ρ,ρ2}.
*
Proposition 7.6**.**
Let G be of type (I) and X=Gk/Bk for k=R.
Moreover Assumption 7.3 holds. Then we have
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
To prove above lemma and proposition,
we need some lemmas.
First recall that
[TABLE]
where H∗,∗′(R2;Z/2)≅Z/2[τ]{1,ρ,ρ2,a′,Q0(a′),ρQ0(a′),Q1(a′)}.
(Here note τ−1ρ3=a′,Q0(a′)=b1,Q1(a′)=b2 in H∗,∗′(X;Z/2).
Hence
[TABLE]
Here in HZar∗(X;HZ/2∗′), degree is given
deg(a′)=(1,2),deg(ρQ0(a′))=(2,3), and
degree of Qi(a′) and
elements in S(t)/(b) are (∗,∗).
Note that all elements in E(GP)2 have degree
(∗+1,∗) or (∗,∗). Hence if Assumption 7.3 holds
[TABLE]
Lemma 7.7**.**
(Lemma 6.12 in [Ya2])
In H∗,∗′(X;Z/2), we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
By the modified Cartan formula
([Vo])
[TABLE]
Hence τSq2(a′)=τSq1(τ)Sq1(a′)=τρQ0(a′). Since
H∗,∗′(X;Z/2) is τ-torsion free, we have the first equation. The second equation follows from
[TABLE]
and Q0Sq2(a′)=ρQ0Q0(a′)=0.
∎
Thus we have Lemma 7.5.
Lemma 7.8**.**
If Assumption 7.3 is satisfied, then we have the isomorphism
[TABLE]
Proof.
The following submodule in H∗(X;HZ/2∗′)
[TABLE]
is closed under Sq2. Its Sq2-homology is
H(A;Sq2)≅Z/2{1,ρ,ρ3}. Note
S(t)/(b) is also closed under Sq2.since H∗(G/T;Z/2) is closed under Sq2. By the Kunneth formula, we have the lemma.
∎
Lemma 7.9**.**
If Assumption 7.3 is satisfied, then we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
We consider the map which induced from the product
[TABLE]
It is known [Ya5] that W∗(Gk)≅W∗(Gk/Tk).
At first we recall
[TABLE]
since H∗,∗′(Gk/Bk;Z/2)≅H∗,∗′(Xˉ;Z/2)
and Xˉ is cellular.
By using Kunneth formula, inductively we get
[TABLE]
where E(GP)r(Y) is the spectral sequence for a space Y.
Similar fact holds for E(BW)r.
Thus we get
W∗(Gk×X)≅W∗(Gk)⊗W∗(X).
Define that x∈W∗(X) is primitive if
[TABLE]
Of course, if x is primitive, then dr(x) is primitive.
We can take generators zi primitive (otherwise, add some
non-primitive elements). If d3(zi)=0, then
it is ρz for z∈H∗(Xˉ;HZ/2∗). But
[TABLE]
is not primitive. Similarly, we can prove the lemma.
∎