
TL;DR
This paper proves that the coproduct of any two non-trivial finite groups does not exist within the category of finite groups, highlighting a fundamental limitation in the structure of finite groups.
Contribution
It establishes a non-existence result for coproducts in the category of finite groups, providing new insights into their categorical properties.
Findings
Coproducts of non-trivial finite groups are not representable.
The result clarifies limitations in categorical constructions within finite group theory.
Highlights the difference between finite and infinite group categories.
Abstract
We show that for any pair of non-trivial finite groups, their coproduct in the category of finite groups is not representable.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinite Group Theory Research
Coproducts of Finite Groups
Chris Hall
Abstract.
We show that for any pair of non-trivial finite groups, their coproduct in the category of finite groups is not representable.
We gratefully acknowledge Bob Guralnick for helpful discussions on this topic.
Given a category and a pair of objects , the coproduct is representable in iff
[TABLE]
such that
[TABLE]
making the diagram
[TABLE]
commute.
Let be finite groups. If we regard them as members of the category of all groups, then is representable: it is the free product , and and are the canonical inclusions. The purpose of this note is to prove the following theorem:
Theorem 1**.**
If are non-trivial groups, then the coproduct in the category of finite groups is not representable.
The key will be the following proposition:
Proposition 2**.**
Let be non-trivial groups, and let and . For every , then there exist a finite group and a homomorphism such that .
Before proving the proposition we show how it implies Theorem 1.
Proof of Theorem 1.
Let be a finite group and
[TABLE]
be homomorphisms. Let
[TABLE]
let be the order of , and let
[TABLE]
be a homomorphism such that as in Proposition 2. Let
[TABLE]
be the respective compositions of
[TABLE]
with so that
[TABLE]
commutes. Observe that
[TABLE]
is empty since has order exceeding while
[TABLE]
has order . Therefore one cannot find a morphism to complete the above diagram, and hence is not representable in the category of finite groups. ∎
The proof of the proposition will occupy the remainder of this note.
Proof of Proposition 2.
To start we recall a special case of a result of Marciniak:
Theorem 3**.**
If there exists a faithful representation , then there exists a faithful representation where .
Proof.
See [1]. ∎
Recall that a group is residually finite iff every non-identity element is contained in the complement of a finite-index normal subgroup.
Corollary 4**.**
* is residually finite.*
Proof.
Let and be the respective group algebras of and , and let . If , then and there exists a canonical faithful representation . Let
[TABLE]
be the corresponding representation given by Theorem 3. It is faithful and the image is finitely generated, so the corollary is a consequence of the fact that any finitely generated subgroup of is residually finite. Rather than appeal to this general fact though, we prove directly that is residually finite.
Let be a non-identity element. We must show that there is a finite-index normal subgroup of whose complement contains .
The set is finite and contained in , so the least common multiple of the denominators of all the entries of the matrices in is a non-zero polynomial . Moreover, the greatest common divisor of the numerators of all the entries of is a non-zero polynomial .
Let be the finite set of zeros of in and . Let be the polynomial ring and
[TABLE]
be the homomorphism induced by the inclusion .
Observe that the elements of all have finite order and generate . Therefore the elements of are roots of unity and generate , so the latter is contained in . In particular, factors through (1).
For each , let be the quotient field and be the composition
[TABLE]
where the last homomorphism is induced by the quotient . Observe that is (canonically) isomorphic to , so we can regard as a homomorphism
[TABLE]
Observe also that the least common multiple of the denominators of the entries of all matrices in is a positive integer , and that . Therefore the image of is contained in the image of the natural homomorphism
[TABLE]
and hence there is a homomorphism
[TABLE]
for each . By construction, and the kernel of has finite index in . In particular, the complement of the latter is a finite-index subgroup containing , so is residually finite as claimed. ∎
Observe that has infinite order in . Therefore, for each , the element is not the identity, hence Corollary 4 implies that there exists a finite-index normal subgroup whose complement contains .
To complete the proof of the proposition, we let and
[TABLE]
be the canonical quotient. By definition,
[TABLE]
hence has order exceeding as claimed. ∎
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Zbigniew S. Marciniak, A note on free products of linear groups , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 94 (1985), no. 1, 46–48. MR 781053
