Distance determination method of dust particles using Rosetta OSIRIS NAC and WAC data
E. Drolshagen, T. Ott, D. Koschny, C. G\"uttler, C. Tubiana, J., Agarwal, H. Sierks, C. Barbieri, P. I. Lamy, R. Rodrigo, H. Rickman, M. F., A'Hearn, M. A. Barucci, J.-L. Bertaux, I. Bertini, G. Cremonese, V. Da Deppo,, B. Davidsson, S. Debei, M. De Cecco, J. Deller, C. Feller

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel method to determine the distance of dust particles from the Rosetta spacecraft using simultaneous images from the OSIRIS NAC and WAC cameras, based on observed trail shifts.
Contribution
The paper presents a new distance determination technique utilizing dual-camera observations to measure dust particle distances in the comet's coma.
Findings
Method works for particles 500m to 6000m away
First results demonstrate feasibility of the approach
Analysis of an example particle confirms the method's potential
Abstract
The ESA Rosetta spacecraft has been tracking its target, the Jupiter-family comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, in close vicinity for over two years. It hosts the OSIRIS instruments: the Optical, Spectroscopic, and Infrared Remote Imaging System composed of two cameras, see e.g. Keller et al. (2007). In some imaging sequences dedicated to observe dust particles in the comet's coma, the two cameras took images at the same time. The aim of this work is to use these simultaneous double camera observations to calculate the dust particles' distance to the spacecraft. As the two cameras are mounted on the spacecraft with an offset of 70 cm, the distance of particles observed by both cameras can be determined by a shift of the particles' apparent trails on the images. This paper presents first results of the ongoing work, introducing the distance determination method for the OSIRIS instrument and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
