# Observing the metal-poor solar neighbourhood: a comparison of galactic   chemical evolution predictions

**Authors:** T. Mishenina (1), M. Pignatari (2,3,6), B.Cot'e (3,4,5,6), F.-K., Thielemann (7), C. Soubiran (8), N. Basak (1), T. Gorbaneva (1), S.A. Korotin, (1,9), V.V. Kovtyukh (1), B. Wehmeyer (7), S. Bisterzo (3,10,11), C., Travaglio (3,10,11), B.K. Gibson (2,6), C. Jordan (2,6), A. Paul (4), C., Ritter (3,6), F. Herwig (3,6) ((1) Astronomical Observatory, Odessa National, University, and Isaac Newton Institute of Chile, Odessa branch, Odessa,, Ukraine, (2) E.A. Milne Centre for Astrophysics, University of Hull, (3) The, NuGrid Collaboration, (4) Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of, Victoria, (5) National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State, University, (6) Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics Center for the, Evolution of the Elements, (7) Department of Physics, University of Basel,, (8) Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Bordeaux, Univ. Bordeaux - CNRS, B18N,, all\'ee Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, (9) Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, (10), INAF, Astrophysical Observatory Turin, Strada Osservatorio 20, (11) B2FH, Association)

arXiv: 1705.03642 · 2017-06-28

## TL;DR

This study precisely measures elemental abundances in metal-poor stars, compares observations with galactic chemical evolution models, and highlights discrepancies likely due to supernova yields, emphasizing the need for improved models.

## Contribution

It provides a consistent dataset of stellar abundances and critically compares these with various GCE predictions, revealing significant model-observation discrepancies.

## Key findings

- Large scatter in GCE model predictions for elemental ratios.
- Inability to reproduce [Sc/Fe], [Ti/Fe], [V/Fe] evolution.
- Supernova yields are likely the main source of discrepancies.

## Abstract

Atmospheric parameters and chemical compositions for ten stars with metallicities in the region of -2.2< [Fe/H] <-0.6 were precisely determined using high resolution, high signal to noise, spectra. For each star the abundances, for 14 to 27 elements, were derived using both LTE and NLTE approaches. In particular, differences by assuming LTE or NLTE are about 0.10 dex; depending on [Fe/H], Teff, gravity and element lines used in the analysis. We find that the O abundance has the largest error, ranging from 0.10 and 0.2 dex. The best measured elements are Cr, Fe, and Mn; with errors etween 0.03 and 0.11 dex. The stars in our sample were included in previous different observational work. We provide a consistent data analysis. The data dispersion introduced in the literature by different techniques and assumptions used by the different authors is within the observational errors, excepting for HD103095. We compare these results with stellar observations from different data sets and a number of theoretical galactic chemical evolution (GCE) simulations. We find a large scatter in the GCE results, used to study the origin of the elements. Within this scatter as found in previous GCE simulations, we cannot reproduce the evolution of the elemental ratios [Sc/Fe], [Ti/Fe], and [V/Fe] at different metallicities. The stellar yields from core collapse supernovae (CCSN) are likely primarily responsible for this discrepancy. Possible solutions and open problems are discussed.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.03642/full.md

## Figures

19 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.03642/full.md

## References

214 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.03642/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.03642