Cobordism classes of maps and covers for spheres
Oleg R. Musin, Jie Wu

TL;DR
This paper proves that for dimensions m>n, all cobordism classes of maps from m-spheres to n-spheres are trivial, with implications for understanding sphere covers.
Contribution
It establishes the triviality of cobordism classes of sphere maps for m>n and explores applications to sphere covers.
Findings
Cobordism classes of maps from m-sphere to n-sphere are trivial for m>n.
Results have applications in the theory of covers for spheres.
Provides a new perspective on cobordism homotopy groups of spheres.
Abstract
In this paper we show that for m>n the set of cobordism classes of maps from m-sphere to n-sphere is trivial. The determination of the cobordism homotopy groups of spheres admits applications to the covers for spheres.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Geometric and Algebraic Topology · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
Cobordism classes of maps and covers for spheres
Oleg R. Musin and Jie Wu111The second author is partially supported by the Singapore Ministry of Education research grant (AcRF Tier 1 WBS No. R-146-000-222-112) and a grant (No. 11329101) of NSFC of China. The first author is partially supported by the NSF grant DMS-1400876 and the RFBR grant 15-01-99563.
Abstract
In this paper we show that for the set of cobordism classes of maps from –sphere to –sphere is trivial. The determination of the cobordism homotopy groups of spheres admits applications to the covers for spheres.
Keywords: cobordism, homotopy group, covers
1 Introduction
Let and be compact oriented manifolds of dimension . Two continuous maps and are called cobordant if there are a compact oriented manifold with and a continuous map such that for . Note that the set of cobordism classes form a group that is a quotient of .
In Section 2 we consider assumptions for such that =0 (Theorem 2.1). In particular, Corollary 2.2 states that and if then
[TABLE]
In Section 3 we show that for manifolds the homotopy and cobordism classes of covers are equivalent to the homotopy and cobordism classes of their associated maps. Then we can apply results of Sections 2 for covers, in particular, see Corollary 3.6.
2 Cobordism classes of maps for spheres
Consider a group of oriented cobordism classes of maps [3, Chapter 1]. Let , , be compact oriented manifolds without boundary of dimension . Let , , be continuous maps to a space . Then in , i.e. maps are cobordant if there are a compact oriented manifold with and a continuous map such that for .
If , then . In this case is called null–cobordant.
Let be a compact oriented manifold without boundary. We denote the set of cobordism classes of by .
Theorem 2.1**.**
Let be a finite -complex whose integral homology has only 2-torsion. Let be a map that induces zero homomorphism of -dimensional cohomology with coefficients in and . Then is null-cobordant. in the image of is 0. In particular, if .
Proof.
By [3, Theorem 17.6], the cobordism class of is determined by the Pontrjagin numbers and the Stiefel-Whitney numbers of the map . From the definition, the Pontrjagin numbers and the Stiefel-Whitney numbers of the map are determined by its induced homomorphisms on cohomology with coefficients in and , respectively. The hypothesis in the statement guarantees that and the constant map induce the same homomorphism on cohomology with coefficients in and , and hence the result. ∎
Let be an –dimensional sphere . In this case denote by . It is easy to prove that the cobordism classes form a group. Moreover, there is a subgroup in such that
[TABLE]
Corollary 2.2**.**
If , then , otherwise .
Proof.
We obviously have the case . Theorem 2.1 yields the most complicated case.
Let . The Hopf degree theorem (see [6, Sect. 7]) states that two continuous maps are homotopic, i.e. in , if and only if . It is clear that implies . Now we show that from follows . Indeed, then we have with . Note that for a regular , is a manifold of dimension one. It is easy to see that a cobordism , where , implies . Thus, . ∎
Corollary 2.2 states that is null-cobordant for . Therefore, we have the following result.
Corollary 2.3**.**
Let . Then for any continuous map there are a compact oriented manifold with and a continuous map such that on the boundary coincides with .
Remark. In the earlier version of this paper, we had a proof that , where only for particular cases. We formulated this statement as a conjecture and sent the preprint to several topologists. Soon, Diarmuid Crowley sent us a sketch of the proof of this conjecture. Later, Alexey Volovikov pointed out to us that Theorem 2.1 follows easily from [3, Theorem 17.6].
3 Homotopy and cobordism classes of covers
For open (or closed) covers of a normal space we considered certain homotopy classes in defined in [8]. In this section we define a homotopy equivalence for covers and prove that two covers and are homotopy equivalent if and only if in (Theorem 3.2). We also prove that two covers on manifolds of the same dimension are cobordant if and only if the corresponding cobordism classes in are equal (Theorem 3.4).
The homotopy invariants can be considered as obstructions for extending covers of a subspace to a cover of all of . (Note that the classical obstruction theory (see [4, 10]) considers homotopy invariants that equal zero if a map can be extended from the –skeleton of to the –skeleton and are non-zero otherwise.) In our papers [8, 9] using these obstructions we obtain generalizations of the classic KKM (Knaster–Kuratowski–Mazurkiewicz) and Sperner lemmas [5, 11].
Let be any compact oriented manifold of dimension and be its boundary. Let be a cover of such that the intersection of all subsets is empty. Then , where the homotopy class is defined in [8]. In the case we have and, if , then for any extension of this cover to a cover of the intersection
[TABLE]
This fact is a generalization of the Sperner–KKM lemma [8, Theorem 2.6].
Another generalization of the KKM lemma is the following (see [8, Corollary 3.1]): Let is an –disc and . If in , then we have property .
However, for not all pairs satisfy property . For instance, and . Then the Hopf map can be extended to a continuous map . It implies that a coresponding cover can be extened to such that the intersection of all is empty.
Let be a collection of open sets whose union contains a normal space . In other words, is a cover of . Let be a partition of unity subordinate to . Let
[TABLE]
where are vertices of an –simplex in .
Suppose the intersection of all is empty. Then is a continuous map from to . In [8, Lemmas 2.1 and 2.2] we proved that a homotopy class in does not depend on . We denote it by .
In fact, see [8, Lemma 2.4], the homotopy classes of covers are also well defined for closed sets. We call a family of sets a cover of a space if is either an open or closed cover of .
Homotopy invariants of covers we defined through homotopy invariants of maps. Let us define them directly for covers.
Definition 3.1**.**
Let , , be covers of a normal space such that for the intersection of all subsets in is empty. We say that is homotopic to and write if can be covered by such that is an extension of of and the intersection of all is empty.
The following theorem extends Theorem 2.2 in [8].
Theorem 3.2**.**
Let , , be covers of a normal space . Suppose the intersection of all the in is empty. Then if and only if in .
Proof.
From [8, Lemma 1.11] it suffices to prove the theorem for open covers. It is clear that if then . Now we prove the converse statement.
Suppose . Let , , be any partitions of unity subordinate to . Then there is a homotopy between and , where .
Consider as the boundary of . Let be the open star of a vertex of . Let
[TABLE]
Then is a cover of .
Denote by the set of all pairs , where is a partition of unity subordinate to . Let
[TABLE]
Then is a cover of and
[TABLE]
This yields . ∎
Definition 3.3**.**
Let , , be compact oriented manifolds without boundary with . Let , , be covers of such that for the intersection of all subsets in is empty. We say that is cobordant to and write if there are a compact oriented manifold with and its cover such that , , and the intersection of all is empty. If , then we say that is null–cobordant and write .
Note that if , then in , where for a continuous by we denote the correspondent cobordism class.
Theorem 3.4**.**
Let and be compact oriented homotopy equivalent manifolds without boundary. Let , , be covers of such that the intersection of all covers in is empty. Then if and only if .
Proof.
By definition if , then there is a map such that . Actually, the theorem can be proved by the same arguments as Theorem 3.2 if we substitute by a cobordism ∎
From this theorem it is easy prove the following corollary.
Corollary 3.5**.**
Let be a cover of a compact oriented manifold such that the intersection of all subsets in is empty. Suppose . Then there is a compact oriented manifold with such that can be extended to a cover of (i.e. ) with the empty intersection of all subsets .
Theorem 3.4 and Corollary 2.2 yield
Corollary 3.6**.**
Let . Then for any cover of with the empty intersection of all subsets in there are a compact oriented manifold with and a cover of such that is an extension of with the empty intersection of all subsets in .
Acknowledgement. We wish to thank Diarmuid Crowley, Alexander Dranishnikov, Roman Karasev, Arkadiy Skopenkov and Alexey Volovikov for helpful discussions and comments.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] D. W. Anderson, E. H. Brown, Jr., F. P. Peterson, S U 𝑆 𝑈 SU -cobordism, K O 𝐾 𝑂 KO -characteristic numbers, and the Kervaire invariant, Ann. of Math. 83 (1966), 54–67.
- 2[2] G. Brumfiel, On the homotopy groups of BPL BPL \mathrm{BPL} and PL / O PL O \mathrm{PL}/\mathrm{O} . Ann. of Math. (2) 88 (1968), 291–311.
- 3[3] P. E. Conner and E. E. Floyd, Differentiable periodic maps, Springer-Verlag, 1964.
- 4[4] S.–T. Hu, Homotopy theory, Acad. Press, 1959.
- 5[5] B. Knaster, C. Kuratowski, S. Mazurkiewicz, Ein Beweis des Fixpunktsatzes für n 𝑛 n –dimensionale Simplexe, Fundamenta Mathematicae 14 (1929): 132–137.
- 6[6] J. W. Milnor, Topology from the differentiable viewpoint, The University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, 1969.
- 7[7] J. W. Milnor, Remarks concerning spin manifolds. 1965 Differential and Combinatorial Topology (A Symposium in Honor of Marston Morse) pp. 55 –62 Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J.
- 8[8] O. R. Musin, Homotopy invariants of covers and KKM type lemmas, Algebr. Geom. Topol., 16 (2016), 1799–1812.
