Non-Inferiority and Equivalence Tests in A Sequential Multiple-Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART)
Palash Ghosh, Inbal Nahum-Shani, Bonnie Spring, Bibhas, Chakraborty

TL;DR
This paper develops new statistical methods and sample size formulas for SMART trial designs to test whether one adaptive intervention is non-inferior or equivalent to another, addressing a gap in current superiority-focused analyses.
Contribution
It introduces novel data analytic techniques and sample size planning tools specifically for non-inferiority and equivalence testing in SMARTs, expanding their application scope.
Findings
Sample size formulas for non-inferiority and equivalence in SMARTs.
Simulation studies demonstrating method performance.
Online planning resources provided.
Abstract
Adaptive interventions (AIs) are increasingly becoming popular in medical and behavioral sciences. An AI is a sequence of individualized intervention options that specify for whom and under what conditions different intervention options should be offered, in order to address the changing needs of individuals as they progress over time. The sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART) is a novel trial design that was developed to aid in empirically constructing effective AIs. The sequential randomizations in a SMART often yield multiple AIs that are embedded in the trial by design. Many SMARTs are motivated by scientific questions pertaining to the comparison of such embedded AIs. Existing data analytic methods and sample size planning resources for SMARTs are suitable for superiority testing, namely for testing whether one embedded AI yields better primary outcomes on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials
