# Comparison of hidden Markov chain models and hidden Markov random field   models in estimation of computed tomography images

**Authors:** Kristi Kuljus, Fekadu L. Bayisa, David Bolin, J\"uri Lember, and Jun, Yu

arXiv: 1705.01727 · 2017-05-05

## TL;DR

This study compares hidden Markov chain models and hidden Markov random field models for predicting CT images from MRI data, finding that HMMs outperform HMRFs in this application.

## Contribution

The paper demonstrates that hidden Markov chain models outperform hidden Markov random field models in CT image prediction from MRI, suggesting HMMs as a promising alternative.

## Key findings

- HMMs outperform HMRFs in CT image prediction.
- HMMs show advantages in modeling applications for medical imaging.
- Results support further investigation of HMMs in imaging tasks.

## Abstract

There is an interest to replace computed tomography (CT) images with magnetic resonance (MR) images for a number of diagnostic and therapeutic workflows. In this article, predicting CT images from a number of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences using regression approach is explored. Two principal areas of application for estimated CT images are dose calculations in MRI-based radiotherapy treatment planning and attenuation correction for positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI. The main purpose of this work is to investigate the performance of hidden Markov (chain) models (HMMs) in comparison to hidden Markov random field (HMRF) models when predicting CT images of head. Our study shows that HMMs have clear advantages over HMRF models in this particular application. Obtained results suggest that HMMs deserve a further study for investigating their potential in modelling applications where the most natural theoretical choice would be the class of HMRF models.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.01727/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.01727/full.md

## References

15 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.01727/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.01727