# Leading components in forward elastic hadron scattering: Derivative dispersion relations and asymptotic uniqueness

## TL;DR

This paper compares derivative dispersion relations and asymptotic uniqueness methods in analyzing high-energy hadron scattering, developing new fits to experimental data and discussing their differences, with implications for understanding the energy dependence of scattering amplitudes.

## Contribution

It provides a detailed comparison of DDR and AU approaches, introduces updated Regge-Gribov fits to scattering data, and evaluates their effectiveness in describing high-energy hadronic interactions.

## Key findings

- Fit results agree with experimental data.
- DDR approach slightly outperforms AU in goodness-of-fit.
- Estimated gamma values around 2.0-2.3 depending on data sets.

## Abstract

Forward amplitude analyses constitute an important approach in the investigation of the energy dependence of the total hadronic cross-section $\sigma_{tot}$ and the $\rho$ parameter. The standard picture indicates for $\sigma_{tot}$ a leading log-squared dependence at the highest c.m. energies, in accordance with the Froissart-Lukaszuk-Martin bound. Beyond this log-squared (L2) leading dependence, other amplitude analyses have considered a log-raised-to-gamma form (L$\gamma$), with $\gamma$ as a real free fit parameter. In this case, analytic connections with $\rho$ can be obtained either through dispersion relations (derivative forms), or asymptotic uniqueness (Phragm\'en-Lindel\"off theorems). In this work we present a detailed discussion on the similarities and mainly the differences between the Derivative Dispersion Relation (DDR) and Asymptotic Uniqueness (AU) approaches and results, with focus on the L$\gamma$ and L2 leading terms. We also develop new Regge-Gribov fits with updated dataset on $\sigma_{tot}$ and $\rho$ from $pp$ and $\bar{p}p$ scattering, in the region 5 GeV-8 TeV. The recent tension between the TOTEM and ATLAS results at 7 TeV and mainly 8 TeV is considered in the data reductions. Our main conclusions are: (1) all fit results present agreement with the experimental data analyzed and the goodness-of-fit is slightly better in case of the DDR approach; (2) by considering only the TOTEM data at the LHC region, the fits with L$\gamma$ indicate $\gamma\sim 2.0\pm 0.2$ (AU) and $\gamma\sim 2.3\pm 0.1$ (DDR); (3) by including the ATLAS data the fits provide $\gamma\sim 1.9\pm 0.1$ (AU) and $\gamma\sim 2.2\pm 0.2$ (DDR); (4) in the formal and practical contexts, the DDR approach is more adequate for the energy interval investigated than the AU approach. A review on the analytic results for $\sigma_{tot}$ and $\rho$ from the Regge-Gribov, DDR and AU approaches is presented.