A counterexample to a conjecture of Kiyota, Murai and Wada
Benjamin Sambale

TL;DR
This paper presents a counterexample disproving a 2002 conjecture that the largest eigenvalue of a block's Cartan matrix is rational if and only if all eigenvalues are rational, challenging previous assumptions in group theory.
Contribution
The authors provide the first known counterexample to the conjecture, showing that the largest eigenvalue can be irrational even when all eigenvalues are rational.
Findings
Counterexample with irrational largest eigenvalue
Disproves the if-and-only-if condition of the conjecture
Discusses implications for the theory of Cartan matrices
Abstract
Kiyota, Murai and Wada conjectured in 2002 that the largest eigenvalue of the Cartan matrix C of a block of a finite group is rational if and only if all eigenvalues of C are rational. We provide a counterexample to this conjecture and discuss related questions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinite Group Theory Research · Advanced Algebra and Geometry · Graph theory and applications
\newaliascnt
LemThm \aliascntresettheLem \newaliascntPropThm \aliascntresettheProp \newaliascntCorThm \aliascntresettheCor \newaliascntConjThm \aliascntresettheConj \newaliascntQuestThm \aliascntresettheQuest
\newaliascntDefThm \aliascntresettheDef \newaliascntExThm \aliascntresettheEx
A counterexample to a conjecture
of Kiyota, Murai and Wada
Benjamin Sambale111Fachbereich Mathematik, TU Kaiserslautern, 67653 Kaiserslautern, Germany, [email protected]
Abstract
Kiyota, Murai and Wada conjectured in 2002 that the largest eigenvalue of the Cartan matrix of a block of a finite group is rational if and only if all eigenvalues of are rational. We provide a counterexample to this conjecture and discuss related questions.
**Keywords: Cartan matrices, eigenvalues, rationality
AMS classification: 20C20**
Let be a block of a finite group with respect to an algebraically closed field of characteristic . It is well-known that the Cartan matrix of is symmetric, positive definite, non-negative and indecomposable (here is the number of simple modules of ). Let (respectively ) be the multiset of elementary divisors (respectively eigenvalues) of . Note that these multisets do not depend on the order of the simple modules of . Let be a defect group of . Then the elementary divisors of divide and occurs just once in . On the other hand, the eigenvalues of are real, positive algebraic integers. By Perron-Frobenius theory, the largest eigenvalue (i. e. the spectral radius) of occurs with multiplicity in . Moreover, . Apart from these facts, there seems little correlation between and .
According to (the weak) Donovan’s Conjecture, there should be an upper bound on in terms of . However, it can happen that . For example, if is the principal -block of , a computation with GAP [1] shows that . This is even more striking than the observation made in [7] for the same block. Conversely, cannot be bounded in terms of : for the principal -block of satisfies (see [4, Example on p. 3843]).
If , then is an eigenvalue of and therefore it is an algebraic integer. This shows that divides . By a similar argument, is divisible by the smallest elementary divisor of . In [3, Questions 1 and 2], Kiyota, Murai and Wada proposed the following conjecture on the rationality of eigenvalues (see also [10, Conjecture]).
Conjecture \theConj (Kiyota-Murai-Wada).
The following assertions are equivalent:
- (1)
. 2. (2)
. 3. (3)
. 4. (4)
.
Clearly, (1) (2) (3) (4) (1) holds and it remains to prove (3) (1). This has been done for blocks of finite or tame representation type (see [3, Propositions 3 and 4]). For -solvable we have (1) (2) (4) and (see [3, Theorem 1], [8, Corollary 3.6] and [4, Corollary 3.6]). Other special cases were considered in [5, 6, 9, 12]. If , then (1)–(4) are satisfied (see [3, Proposition 2]). This holds in particular for the Brauer correspondent of in the normalizer . In view of Broué’s Abelian Defect Group Conjecture, Kiyota, Murai and Wada [3, Question 3] raised the following question.
Question \theQuest (Kiyota-Murai-Wada).
If is abelian and , are and Morita equivalent?
It was proved in [6, 5] that the answer to A counterexample to a conjecture of Kiyota, Murai and Wada is yes for principal -blocks whenever . However, the following counterexample shows not only that A counterexample to a conjecture of Kiyota, Murai and Wada is false, but also that A counterexample to a conjecture of Kiyota, Murai and Wada has a negative answer (for principal blocks) in general:
Let be the principal -block of . The Atlas of Brauer characters [2] (or [11]) gives
[TABLE]
It follows that EV=\bigl{\{}\frac{1}{2}(5+\sqrt{5}),\,\frac{1}{2}(5-\sqrt{5}),\,25\bigr{\}} and . Therefore, , but . Moreover, is abelian since , but cannot be Morita equivalent to , since the eigenvalues of the Cartan matrix of are rational integers as explained above.
We do not know whether the implications (3) (2), (4) (1) or (4) (2) in A counterexample to a conjecture of Kiyota, Murai and Wada might hold in general. Wada [9, Decomposition Conjecture] strengthened all three implications as follows.
Conjecture \theConj (Wada).
There exist partitions and of multisets such that
- •
* for .*
- •
* for .*
- •
* is irreducible for .*
- •
, .
Again we found a counterexample: The group has a faithful -dimensional representation over . Let be the corresponding semidirect product, and let be the principal -block of . This group and its character table can be accessed as and CharacterTable("P49/G1/L1/V1/ext3") in GAP. In this way we obtain , but . Obviously, this contradicts A counterexample to a conjecture of Kiyota, Murai and Wada.
Acknowledgment
I thank Thomas Breuer for some explanations about character tables in GAP. Moreover, I am grateful to Gabriel Navarro for getting me interested in counterexamples. This work is supported by the German Research Foundation (project SA 2864/1-1).
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] The GAP Group, GAP – Groups, Algorithms, and Programming, Version 4.8.7 ; 2017, ( http://www.gap-system.org ).
- 2[2] C. Jansen, K. Lux, R. Parker and R. Wilson, An atlas of Brauer characters , London Mathematical Society Monographs. New Series, Vol. 11, The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 1995.
- 3[3] M. Kiyota, M. Murai and T. Wada, Rationality of eigenvalues of Cartan matrices in finite groups , J. Algebra 249 (2002), 110–119.
- 4[4] M. Kiyota and T. Wada, Some remarks on eigenvalues of the Cartan matrix in finite groups , Comm. Algebra 21 (1993), 3839–3860.
- 5[5] S. Koshitani and Y. Yoshii, Eigenvalues of Cartan matrices of principal 3-blocks of finite groups with abelian Sylow 3-subgroups , J. Algebra 324 (2010), 1985–1993.
- 6[6] N. Kunugi and T. Wada, Eigenvalues of Cartan matrices of principal 2-blocks with abelian defect groups , J. Algebra 319 (2008), 4404–4411.
- 7[7] G. Navarro and B. Sambale, A counterexample to Feit’s Problem VIII on decomposition numbers , J. Algebra 477 (2017), 494–495.
- 8[8] T. Okuyama and T. Wada, Eigenvalues of Cartan matrices of blocks in finite groups , in: Character theory of finite groups, 127–138, Contemp. Math., Vol. 524, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2010.
