# Fluctuating feedback-regulated escape fraction of ionizing radiation in   low-mass, high-redshift galaxies

**Authors:** Maxime Trebitsch, J\'er\'emy Blaizot, Joakim Rosdahl, Julien Devriendt, and Adrianne Slyz

arXiv: 1705.00941 · 2017-05-03

## TL;DR

This study uses high-resolution simulations to show that supernova feedback causes large fluctuations in the escape fraction of ionizing radiation from high-redshift, low-mass galaxies, significantly affecting reionization models.

## Contribution

It demonstrates how supernova-driven feedback regulates ionizing photon escape and causes rapid variability, explaining previous observational scatter.

## Key findings

- Escape fraction varies by over six orders of magnitude.
- Supernova feedback disrupts dense star-forming regions, enabling photon escape.
- Deep surveys may miss about half of ionizing sources due to variability.

## Abstract

Low mass galaxies are thought to provide the bulk of the ionizing radiation necessary to reionize the Universe. The amount of photons escaping the galaxies is poorly constrained theoretically, and difficult to measure observationally. Yet it is an essential parameter of reionization models. We study in detail how ionizing radiation can leak from high redshift galaxies. For this purpose, we use a series of high resolution radiation hydrodynamics simulations, zooming on three dwarf galaxies in a cosmological context. We find that the energy and momentum input from the supernova explosions has a pivotal role in regulating the escape fraction, by disrupting dense star forming clumps, and clearing sight lines in the halo. In the absence of supernovae, photons are absorbed very locally, within the birth clouds of massive stars. We follow the time evolution of the escape fraction, and find that it can vary by more than six orders of magnitude. This explains the large scatter in the value of the escape fraction found by previous studies. This fast variability also impacts the observability of the sources of reionization: a survey even as deep as $M_{\rm UV} = -14$ would miss about half of the underlying population of Lyman-continuum emitters.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.00941/full.md

## Figures

17 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.00941/full.md

## References

119 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.00941/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.00941