Edge arboricity : Do we need equitabilility ?
Nathan Lhote, Mohammed Senhaji

TL;DR
This paper introduces equitable arboricity, a variant of graph arboricity requiring forests to have nearly equal edges, and proves it is equivalent to the traditional arboricity, allowing transformations without changing the number of forests.
Contribution
The paper establishes the equivalence between equitable arboricity and traditional arboricity, providing a new perspective on graph decompositions.
Findings
Equitable arboricity is equivalent to ordinary arboricity.
Any arborescent decomposition can be transformed into an equitable one.
Transformations do not alter the number of forests used.
Abstract
In this paper we study a new variant of graph arboricity, which requires all the forests to have the same number of edges (up to a difference of 1). We prove that the new variant, which we call equitable arboricity, is equivalent to ordinary arboricity. In other words we show that any arborescent decomposition of a graph can be transformed into an equitable one without modifying the number of used forests.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSmart Parking Systems Research
