Models for classifying spaces for $\mathbb{Z}\rtimes \mathbb{Z}$
Daniel Juan-Pineda, Alejandra Trujillo-Negrete

TL;DR
This paper constructs two specific models for the classifying space of infinite cyclic subgroups of the Klein bottle's fundamental group, providing examples outside the scope of existing general methods, especially for hyperbolic groups.
Contribution
It introduces novel models for the classifying space of a particular group, expanding the understanding beyond previously known constructions for hyperbolic groups.
Findings
Two explicit models for the classifying space are constructed.
The models are applicable to the fundamental group of the Klein bottle.
These models differ from existing general constructions.
Abstract
We construct two models for the classifying space for the family of infinite cyclic subgroups of the fundamental group of the Klein bottle. These examples do not fit in general constructions previously done, for example, for hyperbolic groups.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Models for classifying spaces for
Daniel Juan-Pineda
Centro de Ciencias Matemáticas.
UNAM Campus Morelia
Ap.Postal 61-3 Xangari
Morelia, Michoacán. MÉXICO 58089
and
Alejandra Trujillo-Negrete
Centro de Ciencias Matemáticas.
UNAM Campus Morelia
Ap.Postal 61-3 Xangari
Morelia, Michoacán. MÉXICO 58089
Abstract.
We construct two models for the classifying space for the family of infinite cyclic subgroups of the fundamental group of the Klein bottle. These examples do not fit in general constructions previously done, for example, for hyperbolic groups.
We acknolwedge support from research grants from DGAPA-UNAM and CONACyT-México
1. Introduction
Let be a discrete group. A family, , of subgroups of is a nonempty set of subgroups of which is closed under conjugation and taking subgroups. A model, , for the classifying space of the family is a -CW-complex , such that all of its isotropy groups belong to and if is a -CW-complex with isotropy groups belonging to , there is precisely one -map up to -homotopy. Classifying spaces for families appear frequently in mathematics, notably, in various Assembly Isomorphism conjectures such as the Baum–Connes and the Farrell–Jones Conjectures, see [4].
A model for , the classifying space for the family of virtually cyclic subgroups of , may be constructed as countable join with each see [3], with a suitable action of . This space is built by using the fact that each nontrivial virtually cyclic subgroup of is normal in . We cannot build a model for in the same way because this is not the case in . In this note, we present two models for (which are -homotopy equivalent). Our principal results are Theorems 3.6 and 4.1, and Proposition 5.1.
The constructions follow the work of W. Lück and M. Weiermann in [5], and of D. Farley in [1]. The latter uses the fact that is a group as it acts by isometries on the plane, and the former follows a general construction.
We thank the referee for valuable suggestions.
2. Classifying Spaces for Families
Let be a discrete group. A family of subgroups of is a nonempty set of subgroups of which is closed under conjugation and taking subgroups. Some examples are: , the family consisting of the trivial subgroup in , , the family of finite subgroups of , the family of virtually cyclic subgroups of and , the family of all subgroups of .
Let be a subgroup of , and be a family of subgroups of , then defines a family of as follows
[TABLE]
Definition 2.1**.**
Let be a family of subgroups of . A model for the classifying space of the family is a -CW-complex , such that all of whose isotropy groups belong to . If is a -CW-complex with isotropy groups belonging to , there is precisely one map -map up to -homotopy. We denote by be the quotient of by the action of .
In other words, is a terminal object in the category of -CW complexes with isotropy groups belonging to . In particular, two models for are -homotopy equivalent, and then we denote by .
Remark 2.2**.**
Given two families of subgroups of , since is a terminal object in the category of -CW complexes with isotropy groups belonging to , there exists precisely one -map up to -homotopy
[TABLE]
Definition 2.3**.**
Let be a group, and a -set. The fixed point set is defined as
[TABLE]
Theorem 2.4**.**
[4, Thm. 1.9]** A -CW-complex is a model for if and only if the -fixed point set is contractible for and is empty for .
A model for is , a model for is the same as a model for , the total space of the universal -principal bundle , [6].
We write for , this is known as the universal -CW-complex for proper -actions, and we write for .
2.1. Constructing models from models for smaller families
Let and be two families of a group , with , such that we know a model for . In [5] W. Lück and M. Weiermann build a model from , and in [1] Farley builds another model for groups acting on CAT(0)-spaces. In this Section we present these models.
Let and . Following [5], define an equivalence relation on as
[TABLE]
for and in , where denotes the cardinality of the set . Let denote the set of equivalence classes under the above relation and let be the equivalence class of .
For
[TABLE]
This is the isotropy group of under the -action on induced by conjugation. Note that is the commensurator of in . Define a family of subgroups of by
[TABLE]
The method to build a model of from one of is with the following theorem.
Theorem 2.5**.**
[5, Thm. 2.3]** Let and as above. Let be a complete system of representatives of the -orbits in under the -action coming from conjugation. Choose arbitrary -CW-models for , and an arbitrary -CW-model for . Define a -CW-complex by the cellular -pushout
[TABLE]
such that is a cellular -map for every and is an inclusion of -CW-complexes, or such that every map is an inclusion of -CW-complexes for every and is a cellular -map. Then is a model for
The maps in Theorem 2.5 are given by the universal property of classifying spaces for families and inclusions of families of subgroups (see Remark (2.2)).
The following is Definition 2.2, in [1].
Definition 2.6**.**
Let be families of subgroups of a group . We say that a -CW complex is an -complex if
- (i)
whenever , is contractible; 2. (ii)
whenever , .
Observe that if all isotropy groups are in then (ii) holds. Since the trivial subgroup is not in , is not necessarily contractible.
Theorem 2.7**.**
[1, Prop. 2.4]** If is a group and are families of subgroups of , then the join
[TABLE]
is a model for the classifying space .
3. First model for
Let be the klein bottle. Following [1] we construct a model for using the fact that acts by isometries on . This action is given by deck transformations of the universal covering of the Klein bottle as .
3.1. Virtually cyclic subgroups of
Let be the Klein bottle group with multiplication
[TABLE]
inverse element
[TABLE]
and the neutral element is .
Remark 3.1**.**
For we have that
[TABLE]
In the families and are
[TABLE]
Remark 3.2**.**
We classify all infinite cyclic subgroups of the family in . Let , . Observe that
[TABLE]
Therefore infinite cyclic subgroups in are of the following form
[TABLE]
3.2. A model for
The group acts on by deck transformations of the universal covering of the Klein bottle. Explicitly, the action is as follows: let and , then
[TABLE]
Remark 3.3**.**
A model for is , because is contractible and the action (11) is free and properly discontinuous.
Let denote the geodesic line in determined by as
[TABLE]
and let
[TABLE]
denote the geodesic line parallel to -axis, determined by . Let be the * space of lines* in :
[TABLE]
The space of lines is a metric space with the following distance
[TABLE]
Then we have that , where and the metric in each connected component is given by .
Since the action of in sends geodesic lines to geodesic lines, it induces an action of on . For and , this action is as follows,
[TABLE]
Definition 3.4**.**
Let in . We say that a line is an axis for if and acts by translation on . The axis space, for elements of in , is defined as follows
[TABLE]
By (16) all the lines are axes. And by (15) we have
[TABLE]
Observe that if fixes , then it acts on by translation. Therefore if only if , and then
[TABLE]
Proposition 3.5**.**
The axis space of is an -complex.
The proof of Proposition 3.5 is given in the next Subsection.
Theorem 3.6**.**
A model for the classifying space for the family of virtually cyclic subgroups of is the join
[TABLE]
Therefore, the quotient by the action is
[TABLE]
Proof.
By Proposition 3.5, the axis space of , is an -complex. Thus, by Theorem 2.7 and because is a model for , we have (19). On the other hand, (20) easily follows by looking the action of on and , since the action of on is by translation. ∎
3.3. Proof of Proposition 3.5
In this Section we will prove that the axis space is an -complex, which follow from Lemmas 3.7 and 3.8, below.
We denote by the isotropy subgroup of , where , and , that is,
[TABLE]
Lemma 3.7**.**
All isotropy subgroups of the action of in the axis space are in the set .
Proof.
We compute the isotropy subgroups of the action of on . See Remark 3.2 about the family of .
- (i)
If and , by (17), we have
[TABLE]
Suppose with , then:
If is even then
[TABLE] 2. 2.
If is odd then
[TABLE]
- (ii)
Now if , by (15) we have
[TABLE]
- (iii)
Lastly, if , by (16) we have
[TABLE]
If is even, then , and if is odd, , but and , then we conclude that
if then by (7)
[TABLE] 2. 2)
if and then by (6)
[TABLE]
∎
Lemma 3.8**.**
If , the fixed point set is contractible.
Proof.
Let , a infinite cyclic subgroup of (see (6) and (7)), we will describe
[TABLE]
along the following lines.
- (i)
Suppose is even, and , then by (6),
[TABLE]
Observe by (16) that
[TABLE]
Since , then for every .
Now if and , by (17), we have
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
which is contractible.
- (ii)
Let even and . By (15)
[TABLE]
we have that whenever .
On the other side, by (16),
[TABLE]
Therefore,
[TABLE]
which is contractible.
- (iii)
If is odd and , recall from (7) that
[TABLE]
Let and . Since is odd, by (17), no fixes .
Now, if and , by (16) we have
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
the space with a single point in .
∎
4. Building a second model for
In this Section we build a model for following [5, Sec. 2.1]. We recall that subgroups in are of the form (6) or (7), and . In , we have the following equivalences:
(i) Define . Let . By (6),
[TABLE]
hence by (2)
[TABLE]
In fact these subgroups of are the unique subgroups that intersect in an infinite set. Denote this class by
[TABLE]
(ii) Fix and
[TABLE]
Then there is a maximal subgroup in which contains .
Let , we define a subgroup as follows,
[TABLE]
By (6), it is easy to see that is the maximal subgroup in which contains , then by (2),
[TABLE]
Observe by (6) that the only subgroups of related to are the subgroups of which are contained in . Denote by this class in
(iii) We have the following inclusions by (6) and (7)
[TABLE]
By the previous inclusions and (2) we have the following relations
[TABLE]
for every . Denote this class by
[TABLE]
We have in the classes , and infinitely many countable classes of type , as many as maximal subgroups in of the form there are, with relatively prime.
Also acts on by conjugation. The classes and are fixed by conjugation and the classes of type are permuted.
4.1. Explicit models
We describe models for , and , with , defined in (2.1),(4) and . Let .
A model for is . 2. 2.
A model for is , since acts freely on by translation. 3. 3.
(a) Let , where is as in (21), by (5) note: if
[TABLE]
then , and therefore
[TABLE]
So by (4):
(b) We claim that a model for is . Define the action of on as follows
[TABLE]
Observe that any point is fixed by if only if . If is a subgroup not in , then the -fixed point set is the empty set.
Let , then for some . Then the -fixed point set is contractible. Therefore, by Proposition 2.4, we have the claim. 4. 4.
(a) Let , with fixed in , and suppose is maximal in . By (5) we have that
[TABLE]
Then we have two possibilities,
[TABLE]
We conclude by (2.1) that
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
(b) A model for is by Proposition 2.4. Observe that the normalizer of is equal to , therefore is a normal subgroup of and we have the following exact sequence
[TABLE]
where is the inclusion and is the projection onto the quotient Let and , define the action of in as follows:
[TABLE]
So, therefore the isotropy groups are in . Furthermore, is contractible, and if then . 5. 5.
(a) Let be as in (23) and . By equation (5), it follows that
[TABLE]
Since , we conclude by (2.1) that
[TABLE]
so by (2.1), (6) and (7), note:
[TABLE] 6. (b)
A model for is as follows:
By (7), note that for all . Let and consider a point for each . Observe for , that by Remark 3.1. Then acts by permuting the subgroups , .
We define an action of on as follows
[TABLE]
By the above observation and (7), note:
[TABLE]
Therefore the -set is a model for . Since a model for is , by Theorem 2.7 we conclude that a model for is the join .
4.2. A second model for
We are now ready to apply Theorem 2.5 and obtain a model for by the following -pushout. Let and , then
[TABLE]
where is a complete system of representatives of the -orbits under conjugation over the classes of subgroups of type ,
Applying models given in Section 4.1 and the fact , we have
[TABLE]
The maps are given by the universal property of classifying spaces, applied with inclusions of families of subgroups, these are as follows:
is the projection on the -axis, . Since acts on the -axis of by translation and the action of on is also by translation, then is a -map, which is cellular. By Remark 2.2 is unique up to -homotopy. 2. 2.
The map is the inclusion, because the -action is the same on , we have that is a -map. 3. 3.
Let , are the quotient map of on the line through and the origin. It follows the map is -equivariant. 4. 4.
The map is the identity on the first two -spaces corresponding to the disjoint union, and it is the natural -map on the third -space.
Theorem 4.1**.**
Let , and be a complete system of representatives of the -orbits under conjugation over the classes of subgroups of type , From the -pushout (33) we have
[TABLE]
where the maps , and are as before.
5. Homology
In this Section we compute the homology groups of the model given in Theorem 3.6, , where is an countably infinite set. To simplify notation, denote .
Since the Klein bottle is path-connected, then the join is simply connected, [2, Sec. 7.2]. Therefore and
From the well known short exact sequence of the join, see [7, Ch. 8], we have: let ,
[TABLE]
where the homomorphism is given by . (Here and are the homomorphisms induced in homology by the projections of on and respectively.) Then we have the following exact sequence:
[TABLE]
Thus, by the CW structure of and , we use the Künneth theorem to obtain the homology groups of the product :
[TABLE]
Then for :
[TABLE]
and we conclude that
[TABLE]
where is a countably infinite set. If in (34), then
[TABLE]
And at last, for , .
Proposition 5.1**.**
Homology groups of \underline{\underline{B}}(\mathbb{Z}\rtimes\mathbb{Z})=\big{(}\coprod_{J}\mathbb{S}^{1}\big{)}*\mathcal{K}, where is an countably infinite set (Thm. 3.6), are the following:
[TABLE]
where is a countable infinite set.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] D. Farley. Constructions of E 𝒱 𝒞 subscript 𝐸 𝒱 𝒞 E_{\mathcal{VC}} and E ℱ ℬ 𝒞 subscript 𝐸 ℱ ℬ 𝒞 E_{\mathcal{FBC}} for groups acting on CAT(0) spaces . Algebr. Geom. Topol. 10 (4), 2229-2250 (2010).
- 2[2] A. Fomenko, D. Fuchs. Homotopical Topology. Second edition. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer.
- 3[3] D. Juan-Pineda and Ian J. Leary. On classifying spaces for the family of virtually cyclic subgroups , in Recent developments in algebraic topology, Contemp. Math. 407 (2001) 135-145.
- 4[4] W. Lück. Survey on classifying spaces for families of subgroups . In infinite groups: geometric, combinatorial and dynamical aspects, volume 248 of Progr. Math., pages 269-322. Birkhäuser, Basel, 2005.
- 5[5] W. Lück, and M. Weiermann. On the classifying space of the family of virtually cyclic subgroups , Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly, Vol. 8 Nr. 2 (2012).
- 6[6] J. Milnor. Construction of Universal Bundles, I, Ann. of Math. 63:2 (1956) 272-284
- 7[7] J. R. Munkres, Elements of Algebraic Topology . New York: Perseus Books Pub., 1993.
