# Recognizability for sequences of morphisms

**Authors:** Val\'erie Berth\'e, Wolfgang Steiner, J\"org Thuswaldner, Reem, Yassawi

arXiv: 1705.00167 · 2020-05-25

## TL;DR

This paper explores various notions of recognizability for sequences of morphisms, establishing conditions for full and classical recognizability, and introduces the concept of eventual recognizability for $S$-adic shifts, with applications to dynamical systems.

## Contribution

It provides new criteria for full recognizability of morphisms, improves classical recognizability results, and introduces eventual recognizability for morphism sequences, linking them to dynamical systems.

## Key findings

- Full recognizability holds for 2-letter alphabets, rank conditions, or permutative morphisms.
- Any substitution is recognizable for aperiodic points in its shift.
- Sequences with growing compositions are eventually recognizable for aperiodic points.

## Abstract

We investigate different notions of recognizability for a free monoid morphism $\sigma: \mathcal{A}^* \to \mathcal{B}^*$. Full recognizability occurs when each (aperiodic) point in $\mathcal{B}^\mathbb{Z}$ admits at most one tiling with words $\sigma(a)$, $a \in \mathcal{A}$. This is stronger than the classical notion of recognizability of a substitution $\sigma: \mathcal{A}^*\to\mathcal{A}^*$, where the tiling must be compatible with the language of the substitution. We show that if $|\mathcal A|=2$, or if $\sigma$'s incidence matrix has rank $|\mathcal A|$, or if $\sigma$ is permutative, then $\sigma$ is fully recognizable. Next we investigate the classical notion of recognizability and improve earlier results of Moss\'{e} (1992) and Bezuglyi, Kwiatkowski and Medynets (2009), by showing that any substitution is recognizable for aperiodic points in its substitutive shift. Finally we define recognizability and also eventual recognizability for sequences of morphisms which define an $S$-adic shift. We prove that a sequence of morphisms on alphabets of bounded size, such that compositions of consecutive morphisms are growing on all letters, is eventually recognizable for aperiodic points. We provide examples of eventually recognizable, but not recognizable, sequences of morphisms, and sequences of morphisms which are not eventually recognizable. As an application, for a recognizable sequence of morphisms, we obtain an almost everywhere bijective correspondence between the $S$-adic shift it generates, and the measurable Bratteli-Vershik dynamical system that it defines.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.00167/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.00167/full.md

## References

51 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.00167/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.00167