Consciousness is not a physically provable property
Cathy M Reason

TL;DR
This paper presents a logical proof suggesting that physical systems cannot definitively determine if they are conscious, implying a potential link between consciousness and energy conservation violations, with implications for quantum mechanics and free will.
Contribution
It introduces a logical proof that physical systems cannot confirm consciousness, explores quantum interpretation implications, and applies these ideas to free will debates.
Findings
Physical systems cannot definitively prove consciousness.
Potential violation of energy conservation linked to consciousness.
Implications for quantum mechanics interpretations and free will.
Abstract
We present a logical proof that computing machines, and by extension physical systems, can never be certain if they possess conscious awareness. This implies that human consciousness is associated with a violation of energy conservation. We examine the significance that a particular interpretation of quantum mechanics, known as single mind Q (Barrett 1999), might have for the detection of such a violation. Finally we apply single mind Q to the problem of free will as it arises in some celebrated experiments by the neurophysiologist Benjamin Libet.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Free Will and Agency
