Word Affect Intensities
Saif M. Mohammad

TL;DR
This paper introduces the NRC Affect Intensity Lexicon, a manually created dataset with real-valued affect intensity scores for four basic emotions across nearly 6,000 English words, using best-worst scaling for high reliability.
Contribution
It presents the first fine-grained, human-annotated affect intensity lexicon for multiple emotions, improving upon coarse existing affect lexicons with reliable scores.
Findings
AIL has high split-half reliability (>0.91).
Sadness words have lower dominance scores than anger and fear words.
AIL correlates with VAD scores, revealing emotional similarities.
Abstract
Words often convey affect -- emotions, feelings, and attitudes. Further, different words can convey affect to various degrees (intensities). However, existing manually created lexicons for basic emotions (such as anger and fear) indicate only coarse categories of affect association (for example, associated with anger or not associated with anger). Automatic lexicons of affect provide fine degrees of association, but they tend not to be accurate as human-created lexicons. Here, for the first time, we present a manually created affect intensity lexicon with real-valued scores of intensity for four basic emotions: anger, fear, joy, and sadness. (We will subsequently add entries for more emotions such as disgust, anticipation, trust, and surprise.) We refer to this dataset as the NRC Affect Intensity Lexicon, or AIL for short. AIL has entries for close to 6,000 English words. We used a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining · Topic Modeling · Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
