# Generalized G-estimation and Model Selection

**Authors:** M. P. Wallace, E. E. M. Moodie, and D. A. Stephens

arXiv: 1704.08229 · 2017-04-27

## TL;DR

This paper extends G-estimation methods for dynamic treatment regimes to handle non-additive effects and non-continuous outcomes, introducing a model selection criterion and demonstrating its effectiveness through simulations and depression treatment data.

## Contribution

It introduces a generalized G-estimation approach using iteratively-reweighted least squares and develops an information criterion for blip model selection.

## Key findings

- Effective G-estimation extension for complex models
- Proposed model selection criterion improves blip model choice
- Successful application to depression treatment data

## Abstract

Dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) aim to formalize personalized medicine by tailoring treatment decisions to individual patient characteristics. G-estimation for DTR identification targets the parameters of a structural nested mean model known as the blip function from which the optimal DTR is derived. Despite considerable work deriving such estimation methods, there has been little focus on extending G-estimation to the case of non-additive effects, non-continuous outcomes or on model selection. We demonstrate how G-estimation can be more widely applied through the use of iteratively-reweighted least squares procedures, and illustrate this for log-linear models. We then derive a quasi-likelihood function for G-estimation within the DTR framework, and show how it can be used to form an information criterion for blip model selection. These developments are demonstrated through application to a variety of simulation studies as well as data from the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression study.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.08229/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.08229/full.md

## References

27 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.08229/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.08229