Selectively pseudocompact groups without non-trivial convergent sequences
Dmitri Shakhmatov, V\'ictor Hugo Ya\~nez

TL;DR
This paper constructs a Boolean topological group in ZFC that is selectively pseudocompact but lacks non-trivial convergent sequences, addressing a major open problem in topological group theory.
Contribution
It provides the first ZFC example of such a group with selective pseudocompactness properties and no non-trivial convergent sequences, answering longstanding questions.
Findings
Constructed a Boolean topological group with selective pseudocompactness.
Showed the group has no non-trivial convergent sequences.
Proved free precompact Boolean groups over certain spaces contain no infinite compact subsets.
Abstract
The existence of a countably compact group without non-trivial convergent sequences in ZFC alone is a major open problem in topological group theory. We give a ZFC example of a Boolean topological group G without non-trivial convergent sequences having the following "selective" compactness property: For each free ultrafilter p on N and every sequence {U_n:n in N} of non-empty open subsets of G one can choose a point x_n in U_n for all n in such a way that the resulting sequence {x_n:n in N} has a p-limit in G, that is, {n in N: x_n in V} belongs to p for every neighbourhood V of x in G. In particular, G is selectively pseudocompact (strongly pseudocompact) but not selectively sequentially pseudocompact. This answers a question of Dorantes-Aldama and the first author. As a by-product, we show that the free precompact Boolean group over any disjoint sum of maximal countable spacesβ¦
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Selectively pseudocompact groups without non-trivial convergent sequences
Dmitri Shakhmatov
Division of Mathematics, Physics and Earth Sciences
Graduate School of Science and Engineering
Ehime University, Matsuyama 790-8577, Japan
Β andΒ
VΓctor Hugo YaΓ±ez
Masterβs Course, Graduate School of Science and Engineering
Ehime University, Matsuyama 790-8577, Japan
Abstract.
The existence of a countably compact group without non-trivial convergent sequences in ZFC alone is a major open problem in topological group theory. We give a ZFC example of a Boolean topological group without non-trivial convergent sequences having the following βselectiveβ compactness property: For each free ultrafilter on and every sequence of non-empty open subsets of one can choose a point for all in such a way that the resulting sequence has a -limit in ; that is, for every neighbourhood of in . In particular, is selectively pseudocompact (strongly pseudocompact) but not selectively sequentially pseudocompact. This answers a question of Dorantes-Aldama and the first author. As a by-product, we show that the free precompact Boolean group over any disjoint sum of maximal countable spaces contains no infinite compact subsets.
Key words and phrases:
pseudocompact space, strong pseudocompactness, -compactness, selective sequential pseudocompactness, non-trivial convergent sequence, free precompact Boolean group
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary: 22A05; Secondary: 54A20, 54D30, 54H11
The first listed author was partially supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific ResearchΒ (C) No.Β 26400091 of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
This paper was written as part of the second listed authorβs Masterβs Program at the Graduate School of Science and Engineering of Ehime University. The second listed author was partially supported by the 2016 fiscal year grant of the Matsuyama Saibikai.
As usual, denotes the set of natural numbers, denotes the first infinite cardinal. We freely identify with . We use to denote the unique group with two elements.
1. Results
Let be a free ultrafilter on . Recall that a point of a topological space is a -limit of a sequence of points of provided that for every neighbourhood of in [2].
The next notion is due to Angoa, Ortiz-Castillo and Tamariz-MascarΓΊa [1].
Definition 1.1**.**
Let be a free ultrafilter on . A space is strongly -pseudocompact if it has the following property: For every sequence of non-empty open subsets of one can choose a point for all in such a way that the resulting sequence has a -limit in .
The symbol denotes the Stone-Δech compactification of . Recall that can be identified with the set of all free ultrafilters on .
Given a non-empty subset of , we shall say that a space is strongly -pseudocompact provided that is strongly -pseudocompact for each .
Theorem 1.2**.**
Let be an infinite cardinal such that and be a non-empty subset of satisfying . Then there exists a dense strongly -pseudocompact subgroup of without non-trivial convergent sequences.
Let denote the cardinality of the continuum. Applying Theorem 1.2 to and , we get the following
Corollary 1.3**.**
There exists a dense strongly -pseudocompact subgroup of without non-trivial convergent sequences.
Given a free ultrafilter on , we can apply Theorem 1.2 to and to get the following
Corollary 1.4**.**
For every free ultrafilter on , there exists a dense strongly -pseudocompact subgroup of without non-trivial convergent sequences.
Garcia-Ferreira and Ortiz-Castillo say that a space is strongly pseudocompact provided that, for every sequence of non-empty open subsets of , one can choose a point for all in such a way that the resulting sequence has a -limit in for some free ultrafilter on (depending on the sequence in question) [6]. Dorantes-Aldama and Shakhmatov gave a list of equivalent descriptions of this property in [5, Theorem 2.1] and proposed an alternative name for it, calling a space with this property selectively pseudocompact [5, Definition 2.2]. Clearly, strongly -pseudocompact spaces are strongly pseudocompact (selectively pseudocompact). In particular, the groups from Theorem 1.2 and both of its corollaries above are strongly pseudocompact (selectively pseudocompact).
Dorantes-Aldama and the first listed author call a space selectively sequentially pseudocompact provided that, for every sequence of non-empty open subsets of , one can choose a point for all in such a way that the resulting sequence has a convergent subsequence [5, Definition 2.3]. Selectively sequentially pseudocompact spaces are strongly pseudocompact (selectively pseudocompact), while the converse does not hold in general [5].
Since infinite selectively sequentially pseudocompact spaces contain non-trivial convergent sequences [5, Proposition 3.1], from Corollary 1.4 and remarks above we obtain the following result:
Corollary 1.5**.**
There exists a dense subgroup of which is selectively pseudocompact (strongly pseudocompact) but not selectively sequentially pseudocompact.
This corollary provides a positive answer to [5, Question 8.3 (i)]. Consistent examples of such topological groups were mentioned already in [5, Example 5.7].
We finish this section with the following question.
Question 1.6**.**
Is there an abelian (or even Boolean) group without infinite compact subsets having one of the following properties (listed in an increasing strength):
- (i)
selectively pseudocompact (strongly pseudocompact);
- (ii)
strongly -pseudocompact for some free ultrafilter ;
- (iii)
strongly -pseudocompact.
2. Coherent splitting maps
Let be a non-empty set. The set of all finite subsets of becomes an abelian group with the symmetric difference as its group operation and the empty set as its zero element. Each element of has order , as . A group with this property is often called a Boolean group. Every Boolean group is abelian.
If one abuses notation by identifying an element with the singleton , then each element of the group admits a unique decomposition , so the set can be naturally considered as the set of generators of .
Every map has a unique extension to a homomorphism of to defined by for , where the sum is taken in the group . Since the variety of all Boolean groups is generated by the single group , the group coincides with the free group in the variety over a set [4]. Thus, is the free Boolean group over .
Definition 2.1**.**
Let be a non-empty set. We shall say that a map splits a subset of provided that the set is infinite for each .
Clearly, a subset split by some map must be infinite. The converse also holds:
Lemma 2.2**.**
Every infinite subset of can be split by some map .
This lemma is part of folklore and can be proved by a straightforward induction. It can also be derived from [13, Lemma 4.1].
From now on we shall specify the structure of the set .
Definition 2.3**.**
Let be a non-empty subset of and let be a non-empty set. Consider a set of the form . We shall say that a map is coherent provided that
[TABLE]
Note that the map is coherent if and only if is a -limit of the sequence whenever and .
Definition 2.4**.**
For a set as in Definition 2.3, we define .
Lemma 2.5**.**
Every map admits a unique coherent extension over .
Proof.
For fixed and , we have
[TABLE]
Since is an ultrafilter on , there exists a unique such that
[TABLE]
Define for every and . Finally, let for all . It follows from this definition and (2) that (1) holds; that is, is coherent by Definition 2.3. β
The main goal of this section is to prove the following theorem strengthening Lemma 2.2 by additionally requiring the splitting map to be coherent.
Theorem 2.6**.**
If is the set as in Definition 2.3, then every infinite subset of can be split by some coherent map .
The interpretation of this theorem in terms of free precompact Boolean groups shall be given in Section 4; see Theorem 4.2.
The rest of this section is devoted to the proof of this theorem. It shall be split into two lemmas dealing with particular cases.
Lemma 2.7**.**
Let be the set as in Definition 2.3 and be as in Definition 2.4. If is an infinite subset of such that is finite, then some coherent map splits .
Proof.
Since is finite and is infinite, there exists such that the set
[TABLE]
is infinite. Then
[TABLE]
is an infinite subset of . By Lemma 2.2, there exists a map which splits . Let be the unique coherent map extending given by Lemma 2.5. Since splits and extends , the map splits as well. It follows from this, (4) and Definition 2.1 that
[TABLE]
Define . Clearly, . It follows from (3) and (4) that for every , so holds in , and therefore,
[TABLE]
as is a homomorphism. Combining (5) and (6), we conclude that is infinite for every . Since , the same conclusion holds when is replaced by . According to Definition 2.1, this means that splits . β
Let be a poset. Recall that a set is said to be dense in provided that for every there exists such that .
We shall need the following folklore lemma.
Lemma 2.8**.**
If is an at most countable family of dense subsets of a non-empty poset , then there exists an at most countable subset of such that is a linearly ordered set and for every .
Proof.
Since the family is at most countable, we can fix an enumeration of elements of . Since , there exists . By induction on , we can choose such that ; this is possible because is dense in . Now is the desired subset of . β
Lemma 2.9**.**
Suppose that and are at most countable non-empty sets such that , is the set as in Definition 2.3 and is as in Definition 2.4. Assume also that is a subset of such that the set is infinite. Then some coherent map splits .
Proof.
We denote by the set of all structures , where , , and is a coherent map. For , we let provided that , and extends . One easily sees that is a poset. Clearly, , so .
Claim 1**.**
(i) For every , the set is dense in .
(ii) For every , the set is dense in .
Proof.
(i) Suppose that and . Define , and note that the extension of obtained by letting for all and , is coherent, so . Clearly, and .
(ii) Suppose that and . Define , and note that the extension of obtained by letting for all and , is coherent, so . Clearly, and . β
Claim 2**.**
For every and each , the set
[TABLE]
is dense in .
Proof.
Let , and be arbitrary. We need to find such that , and .
Since is finite, the intersection is also finite. Furthermore, since both and are finite sets, so is the set . Therefore,
[TABLE]
is a finite subset of . By our hypothesis, is infinite, so there exists such that . Fix , and such that . It follows from this and (8) that .
Since is a finite subset of , there exist finite sets and such that . Without loss of generality, we may also assume that and .
Let . Then is well-defined. There exists a unique such that . Note that so we can define a function by
[TABLE]
for all .
We claim that . Since and by our construction, we only need to check that the map is coherent. Let and be arbitrary. If , then
[TABLE]
by (9) and coherency of . Suppose now that . If , then for all by (9), so . Finally, if , then the second line of (9) implies that and for all but finitely many , as the set is finite. Therefore, is a cofinite subset of , so it belongs to as is a free ultrafilter on . This finishes the check of the inclusion . Clearly, .
Let us show that . The only condition that remains to be checked is the equality .
First, let us show that . Indeed, since , we have , so (9) implies that and for all such that . (Recall that by our choice.) Since is a homomorphism, this implies
[TABLE]
Second, note that , so . Since is a homomorphism, β
[TABLE]
consists of dense subsets of . Since , and are at most countable, so is . By Lemma 2.8, there exists a set such that and for every . We claim that is the coherent map from to splitting . Since intersects each and every , the domain of coincides with . Since each is coherent and extends all , it easily follows that is coherent as well.
Suppose that does not split . Then the set must be finite for some , so and thus, . Therefore, for some . Applying (7), we can find such that and . Since , this implies . Therefore, by the definition of the set , in contradiction with . β
Proof of Theorem 2.6. Let be an infinite subset of . Choose a countably infinite subset of . Since , there exists at most countable sets and such that , where . Combining Lemmas 2.7 and 2.9, we can find a coherent map splitting . Let be the extension of over obtained by letting to take [math] everywhere on . Clearly, is a coherent map which splits . Since , splits as well. β
3. Proof of Theorem 1.2
Fix a cardinal such that , and let be a non-empty subset of satisfying . Define
[TABLE]
Note that by our assumption on and , so and , where denotes the family of all countable subsets of . Therefore, we can fix an enumeration
[TABLE]
such that for every the set is cofinal in . For every , use Theorem 2.6 to fix a coherent map splitting .
Since by our assumption on , and for every , we can fix an enumeration and a sequence for every such that whenever , and , there exists with and for all .
Let be arbitrary. For every , the sequence of points of the compact space has a -limit .
For each , define by
[TABLE]
Finally, let
[TABLE]
Claim 3**.**
is a dense, strongly -pseudocompact subset of .
Proof.
Let be arbitrary. We are going to check that is strongly -pseudocompact. Let be a sequence of non-empty basic open subsets of . Then for every , we have , where each is a non-empty open subset of and is a finite subset of . Then the set is at most countable, so we can fix a countably infinite subset of containing .
For every , is a non-empty subset of , so we can select .
By the property of our enumeration, there exists such that and for all . By (10), for every , we have
[TABLE]
Since , this implies for each . Since , it suffices to check that is a -limit of the sequence . To achieve this, one only needs to show that is a -limit of the sequence for every . We consider two cases.
Case 1. . Since the sequence has a -limit , it follows that is a -limit of the sequence . Since , we have . Combining this with (12), we get the desired conclusion.
Case 2. . In this case, it follows from (10) that for every , and the conclusion follows from the fact that is coherent.
To prove that is dense in , consider an arbitrary non-empty open subset of . Applying the above argument to a fixed and the sequence , where for every , we find such that ; in particular, . β
Claim 4**.**
The subgroup of generated by contains no non-trivial convergent sequences.
Proof.
Consider an arbitrary faithfully indexed sequence . Since is a Boolean group generated by the set , for every there exists a finite subset of such that
[TABLE]
Since the sequence is faithfully indexed, so is the sequence . In particular, . By the choice of our enumeration, the set is cofinal in .
Since is at most countable subset of , the set
[TABLE]
is at most countable as well. Therefore,
[TABLE]
is an at most countable subset of . Since and is cofinal in , we can find .
Let be arbitrary. Suppose that . Then by the inclusion and (14). Therefore, by (15). Since , we conclude that , and thus by (10). Since this holds for every and is a homomorphism, we conclude that
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where the last equality is due to (13). Since splits the sequence , this means that the set is infinite for both . This implies that cannot be a convergent sequence in . β
Since and is dense in by Claim 3, is dense in . Since is strongly -pseudocompact by Claim 3, so is . β
4. An application to free precompact Boolean groups
In this section we give an interpretation of Theorem 2.6 in terms of free precompact Boolean groups over disjoint sums of countable maximal spaces.
Recall that a topological group is precompact if it is a subgroup of some compact group, or equivalently, if its completion is compact. The class of all precompact Boolean groups forms a variety of topological groups [7, 8]. Therefore, given a topological space , there exists the free object of in [9, 3] which we shall call the free precompact Boolean group of .
A description of this object as the reflection of the free (Abelian) topological group of a space in the class of precompact Boolean groups can be found in [11, Section 9]. Here is another description.
Lemma 4.1**.**
Let be a zero-dimensional topological space and let be the family of all continuous maps from to the group endowed with the discrete topology. Consider the initial topology on with respect to the family of homomorphisms; that is, the family, forms a subbasis for the topology . Then is topologically isomorphic to and induces the original topology on after identification of with the subspace of .
Proof.
Let us first notice four facts.
- (i)
The completion of a precompact Boolean group is a compact Boolean group, and the standard facts of the duality theory imply that is topologically isomorphic to the Cartesian product for some cardinal .
- (ii)
It follows from (i) that the variety of precompact Boolean groups is generated by the single topological group (taken with the discrete topology).
- (iii)
Since is zero-dimensional, the family separates points and closed subsets of , so the diagonal map of the family is a homeomorphic embedding of into .
- (iv)
Since is zero-dimensional, is -independent subset of , where is the algebraic variety of groups of order ; see [4, Section 5].
The conclusion of our lemma now follows from these facts via a standard argument. β
We refer the reader to [10, Section 2] for properties of free precompact (Abelian) groups and [12] for those of free precompact Boolean groups.
For simplicity, we shall say that a space is elementary if it is homeomorphic to a subspace of the form of , where . Alternatively, an elementary space is a countably infinite space with a single non-isolated point such that the trace of the filter of neighbourhoods of on the discrete part of is an ultrafilter on .
Recall that a space is maximal if it is non-discrete yet any strictly stronger topology on it is discrete. One can easily see that elementary spaces are precisely the countably infinite maximal spaces.
The alternative reformulation of Theorem 2.6 is the following
Theorem 4.2**.**
The free precompact Boolean group of any topological sum of elementary spaces () contains no non-trivial convergent sequences.
Proof.
First, we prove our theorem in the special case.
Let be the set as in Definition 2.3 and be as in Definition 2.4. Introduce the following topology on . Declare each point of to be isolated. A basic open neighbourhood of a point is of the form for a given element . Note that each for is a clopen subset of homeomorphic to the elementary space , so is a topological sum of elementary spaces .
It is straightforward to check that, when is equipped with the topology described above, a map is continuous if and only if it is coherent in the sense of Definition 2.3. Therefore, the family in Lemma 4.1 is precisely the family of all coherent maps from to .
Now, let be an infinite subset of . By Lemma 4.1, we can identify with , where is the topology on described in this lemma. After this identification, we can think of as being an infinite subset of . By Theorem 2.6, is split by some coherent map . By the previous paragraph, . Therefore, is a -clopen partition of , where for . Since is split by , the intersection is infinite for both . This shows that cannot be a convergent sequence in .
Having this particular case proved, consider now a general case of a topological sum of elementary spaces . For , let where each point for is isolated and the point is non-isolated; let be the filter on obtained by βcopying over β the trace on of the filter of neighbourhoods of the non-isolated point in .
In the special case, take and ; that is, consider the topological sum
[TABLE]
Let be the natural homeomorphic embedding which sends each point to for and . Since every bounded continuous map admits a continuous extension over , it easily follows from Lemma 4.1 that is a subgroup of . Since we have already proved that the bigger group contains no non-trivial convergent sequences, the same conclusion holds for . β
It should be noted that Theorem 4.2 is not completely trivial, as the completion of any precompact group is a compact group, and compact groups contain many non-trivial convergent sequences.
In fact, even a stronger conclusion holds in Theorem 4.2.
Corollary 4.3**.**
The free precompact Boolean group of any topological sum of elementary spaces () contains no infinite compact subsets.
Proof.
Suppose that is an infinite compact subset of . Choose a countably infinite subset of . Then its closure in is compact as well, so without loss of generality we may assume that is dense in . Since is countable, there exists an at most countable set such that . Since is clopen in , is a closed subgroup of . Since and is dense in , it follows that . Since the group is countable, so is . Therefore, the compact space must be metrizable. As it is infinite, it must contain a non-trivial convergent sequence. We have found a non-trivial convergent sequence in , in contradiction with Theorem 4.2. This contradiction shows that all compact subsets of are finite. β
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] J. Angoa, Y.F. Ortiz-Castillo, A. Tamariz-MascarΓΊa, Ultrafilters and properties related to compactness, Topol. Proc. 43 (2014) 183β200.
- 2[2] A.R. Bernstein, A new kind of compactness for topological spaces, Fundam. Math. 66 (1970) 185β193.
- 3[3] W. W. Comfort, J. van Mill, On the existence of free topological groups, Topology Appl. 29 (1988) 245β269.
- 4[4] D. Dikranjan, D. Shakhmatov, Algebraic structure of pseudocompact groups, Memoirs Amer. Math. Soc. 133/633 (1998), 83 pages.
- 5[5] A. Dorantes-Aldama, D. Shakhmatov, Selective sequential pseudocompactness, Topology Appl. 222 (2017) 53β69.
- 6[6] S. Garcia-Ferreira, Y.F. Ortiz-Castillo, Strong pseudocompact properties, Comment. Math. Univ. Carol. 55 (2014) 101β109.
- 7[7] G. Higman, Unrestricted free products, and varieties of topological groups, J. London Math. Soc. 27 (1952) 73β81.
- 8[8] S. A. Morris, Varieties of topological groups, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 1 (2) (1969) 145β160.
