Inverse Galois problem for ordinary curves
Raymond van Bommel

TL;DR
This paper addresses the inverse Galois problem over function fields in positive characteristic by developing a method to construct Galois covers of ordinary curves, leveraging deformation techniques from semi-stable to smooth curves.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to construct Galois covers of ordinary curves in positive characteristic using deformation of semi-stable curves.
Findings
Constructed Galois covers of ordinary semi-stable curves.
Deformed semi-stable covers into smooth Galois covers.
Provided new insights into the inverse Galois problem in positive characteristic.
Abstract
We consider the inverse Galois problem over function fields of positive characteristic p, for example, the inverse Galois problem over the projective line. We describe a method to construct certain Galois covers of the projective line and other curves, which are ordinary in the sense that their Jacobian has maximal p-torsion. We do this by constructing Galois covers of ordinary semi-stable curves, and then deforming them into smooth Galois covers.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Inverse Galois problem for ordinary curves
Raymond van Bommel
Abstract. We consider the inverse Galois problem over function fields of positive characteristic , for example, the inverse Galois problem over the projective line. We describe a method to construct certain Galois covers of the projective line and other curves, which are ordinary in the sense that their Jacobian has maximal -torsion. We do this by constructing Galois covers of ordinary semi-stable curves, and then deforming them into smooth Galois covers.
Keywords: Curves, Covers, Deformation theory
Mathematics Subject Classification (2010): 14H30, 14H25, 14H40, 14B07, 14G17, 11G20.
1 Introduction
In [GlPr05], Glass and Pries prove that there is an ordinary (in the sense that their Jacobians have maximal -torsion) hyperelliptic curve of every genus in characteristic . Viewing hyperelliptic curves as -covers of the projective line , this leads to the following question: is it possible, for any finite group , to construct an ordinary curve which is a Galois cover of whose Galois group is ?
The inverse Galois problem over function fields has been studied extensively. In [Har84] and [Har87], Harbater solved the problem for and for where is a complete ultrametric field (see also [MaMa99, Sect. V.2]). The problem is solved by explicitly constructing covers of over or using rigid analytic methods. These methods, however, do not seem to give us a way to easily determine whether the curves constructed are ordinary.
In this article, we will construct Galois covers which are ordinary using a different method: deformation theory. We will reprove the aforementioned result by Glass and Pries in a different way, that will also allow us to construct ordinary covers of (and other curves) with other Galois groups.
For our method, we will consider Galois covers of ordinary semi-stable curves. We will then use deformation theory on semi-stable curves, [DeMu69], and in particular on curves with an action of a group, [Sai12], to smoothen the cover. Our key result in this direction is the following.
Theorem**.**
Let be a finite group and let be a Galois cover (cf. Def. 15, p. 15), with Galois group , of semi-stable curves over an algebraically closed field of characteristic coprime to the order of . Moreover, suppose that for each and each , the determinant of the action of on the tangent space at is if swaps the two branches of at and 1 otherwise. Then there exists a smoothening of the cover , where and are semi-stable curves over , such that is ordinary. In partiucular if is ordinary, then is ordinary, respectively.
For example, using a configuration of copies of , whose associated graph is an -gon, we will realise the dihedral group .
Example** (Ex. 28, p. 28).**
Let be a positive integer and let be a prime number not dividing . Then there exists a Galois cover with group such that is a smooth ordinary curve over .
In section 2, we will treat the definitions necessary to extend the notion of ordinarity to semi-stable curves. In section 3, we will look at graphs associated to semi-stable curves and their quotients by group actions. In section 4, we show how to deform these singular curves to smooth curves, while preserving the group action. The proof of the main theorem will be given in section 5. Finally, in section 6, we will list some examples of groups for which we can construct ordinary Galois covers, using this method.
Acknowledgements. The author wishes to thank his PhD advisors David Holmes and Fabien Pazuki, and also Bas Edixhoven, Maarten Derickx and Peter Koymans, for their thorough reading of this paper and their useful comments for improvements.
2 Ordinarity of semi-stable curves
Let us first recall the notion of semi-stable curves.
Definition 1**.**
For an algebraically closed field , a semi-stable curve over is a scheme that is reduced, connected, one-dimensional, projective over (i.e. an algebraic curve) whose singular points are nodal, i.e. they are ordinary double points. More generally, for a scheme , a scheme is said to be a semi-stable curve over if is a semi-stable curve over for every geometric point of .
Let be an algebraically closed field of characteristic and let be a semi-stable curve. Consider the map raising all sections to the power and let be the induced map on cohomology. This map satisfies the conditions of [Mum70, Cor., chap. 14, p. 143], hence decomposes as the sum of a semisimple part and a nilpotent part. Now we use this to define the notion of ordinarity for semi-stable curves.
Definition 2** ([Mum70, sect. 15, p. 146–150]).**
Let be an algebraically closed field of characteristic . Let be a semi-stable curve over and, moreover, let be the map induced by the absolute Frobenius. Then is called ordinary if the semisimple rank of is maximal or, in other words, if the dimension of the semisimple part of is equal to . More generally, for a scheme , a semi-stable curve is called ordinary if is ordinary for every geometric point of .
Remark 3**.**
It is well-known that for smooth curves this definition coincides with the classical definition, i.e. a smooth curve is ordinary of the -torsion of the Jacobian of the curve is maximal.
An easy well-known corollary of [Mum70, Cor., chap. 14, p. 143] is the following lemma.
Lemma 4**.**
Let and be as before. Then is ordinary if and only if is an isomorphism.
The goal of this section is to prove that a semi-stable curve is ordinary (in the sense of Definition 2) if and only if all irreducible components of its normalisation are.
Proposition 5**.**
Let be a semi-stable curve over an algebraically closed field. Let be the irreducible components of its normalisation. Then is ordinary if and only if for all the smooth curve is ordinary.
Proof.
Consider the exact sequence
[TABLE]
The sheaf is a direct sum of skyscraper sheaves, one for each singular point of , having as stalk in . As is an affine morphism, we have for any quasi-coherent sheaf of -modules on . Hence, for the associated long exact sequence we get
[TABLE]
Now consider the action of Frobenius on this exact sequence. On and it acts componentwise, hence it induces an isomorphism. By Lemma 4, on the one hand, Frobenius acts on as an isomorphism if and only if is ordinary. On the other hand, Frobenius acts on as an isomorphism if and only if is ordinary. Now we can use the five-lemma to conclude the desired result. ∎
3 Quotients of curves
In this section, we will build a formalism for graphs associated to semi-stable curves. Given a semi-stable curve with a group acting on it, we want to build an action of on the associated graph, and define a good quotient in the category of graphs. The key property we need is that the graph of the quotient curve is naturally the quotient of the graph. The following two examples will serve as motivation for the definition that follows.
Throughout this section will be , the spectrum of an algebraically closed field.
Example 6**.**
Let be a curve obtained by gluing three copies of to form a triangle. We let the group act on by cyclically permuting these curves. Then the quotient of by is one copy of with two of its points glued together.
Example 7**.**
Let be the same curve as in the previous example. We let the group act on , by cyclically permuting and mirroring the whole curve in its three symmetry axes. Then the quotient of by is isomorphic to .
Definition 8** (Graph).**
A graph consists of the data of a set of vertices , for every a set of edge ends, an element111The elements of the may seem to be a bit out of place. The reason they exists is because morphisms of semi-stable curves can map singular points to smooth points. This will be clarified further in Remark 14. , and an involution , giving the opposite of each edge end, whose only fixed points are the .
A morphism of graphs from to consists of a morphism and morphisms for every , gluing to a morphism such that .
Remark 9**.**
Colimits exist in the category of graphs. For a diagram of graphs the colimit is constructed as follows. The set of vertices is the colimit of the sets of vertices in the diagram. For each vertex , we consider the collection of vertices in the original diagram that map to . Its sets of edge ends form a diagram . Then we take the colimit of this diagram, together with the map obtained by gluing the . Now , the set of edge ends for , is obtained from by identifying all edge ends which are fixed points of . The element is the image of for any mapping to . The morphism is directly obtained from . One can easily check that this indeed defines a graph and that this is the colimit of the diagram.
In particular, for a graph equipped with an action of a group , the quotient graph can be shown to exist by taking the colimit of the diagram whose unique object is and whose arrows are given by the elements of .
Definition 10** (Associated graph of a semi-stable curve).**
Let be a semi-stable curve over . Then we can associate to it a graph, whose vertices are the irreducible components. Besides the for each vertex , there are also two edge ends for each singular point : one for each of the two (possibly the same) components that are intersecting there. The involution swaps the two edge ends corresponding to .
Example 11**.**
The graph corresponding to the curve from Examples 6 and 7 consists of three vertices and . The set of edge ends for is , where and . In both cases, the graph associated to the quotient curve (a single point with a loop, and a single point, respectively) is the quotient of by the action of and , respectively.
Proposition 12**.**
Let be a possibly singular reduced curve. Let be its normalisation. Then is semi-stable if and only if there exist two maps from the singular locus of to such that is the inclusion of the singular locus in and is the colimit of the following diagram with these two arrows:
[TABLE]
Proof.
If is semi-stable, then there lie two points above each singular point of and by ordering them for each singular point, we get two maps and as required. Then by [Liu02, Prop. 7.5.15, p. 310], is the colimit of the diagram.
If is such a colimit, then above each singular point of there are one or two points. If there is only one, then would be smooth at that point, which is not the case, hence there are two. Then by [Liu02, Prop. 7.5.15, p. 310] the singularities are nodal and we are done. ∎
Proposition 13**.**
Let be a semi-stable curve. Let be a finite group. Let be the graph associated to . Then there exists a semi-stable curve that is a categorical quotient of by in the category of schemes. Its associated graph is .
Proof.
Let be the normalisation of . For each singular point choose an ordering on the two points in . Let be the union of the singular points of . Then the ordering chosen gives us two maps mapping to the first respectively second point in . Observe, cf. Proposition 12, that is the colimit of the diagram
[TABLE]
where the two maps are and .
The universal property of the normalisation gives us an extension of the action of on to . Now the irreducible components of are connected and permutes them. Using [Mum70, Thm. 1, chap. 12, p. 111], we see that the categorical quotient of by the group action of identifies components sent to each other and each such component is replaced by the quotient of that component by the action of its stabiliser. Now we will recall the standard argument to prove that these quotients of the components are smooth curves.
As a subring of an integral ring is integral, the quotients of the components are integral. Furthermore, they are normal, as for an integrally closed domain with an action of a group , the ring is integrally closed. As is an integral extension of , it has the going-up property and is noetherian and of dimension 1. Hence, the quotients of the components are normal integral of dimension 1. Hence, the quotients of the components of are smooth curves, see also [Stacks, 0BX2].
Now we will re-glue the points. Let be the colimit of the diagram
[TABLE]
where the two maps are and . Let be the natural map. Now, we will prove that this is also a categorical quotient of by .
[TABLE]
First of all, the maps and are the same by construction. Hence, there is a map , such that .
Let be a test scheme with a trivial action of and be a -equivariant map. Then the map is also -equivariant and gives rise to a unique map , such that . Now we have
[TABLE]
and hence by the universal property of the colimit there is a unique map such that . Now the compositions and are equal. Since the normalisation is surjective on schemes and injective on the underlying rings, it is an epimorphism. This yields as desired.
Now the statement follows by using Proposition 12. ∎
Remark 14**.**
These methods can also be generalised to the case of marked semi-stable curves. The distinguished edge ends should be removed, and instead marked points should correspond to fixed points of the involution on the edge ends. Furthermore, it is necessary to require that the marked points are smooth and that morphisms map singular points to singular or marked points.
4 Deformations of -covers
In this section, we will treat deformations of Galois covers. Let us first define this notion.
Definition 15** (Galois cover).**
Let be a morphism of noetherian schemes or noetherian formal schemes, and let be (isomorphic to) a finite group of automorphisms of . Then is called a Galois cover with group if:
- •
as a topological space is the quotient of by ,
- •
for each open we have , and
- •
each does not act as the identity on any of the irreducible components of .
Set-up 16**.**
Let be a semi-stable curve over , the spectrum of an algebraically closed field. Let be a finite group of order coprime to such that for each component of the stabiliser acts faithfully on the component. Let be the quotient of by (as in Proposition 13). Then is a Galois cover with group .
Remark 17**.**
Suppose we are in the setting of Set-up 16. Let be a node and let be its image . Then could be either singular or smooth. We will describe the local structure of the covering in both cases.
- •
If , then we know that and moreover (cf. [Liu02, Prop. 5.15, p. 310]) and, swapping the variables if necessary, one easily checks that the original cover is given by
[TABLE]
for some integers and and units and . The stabiliser acts faithfully on both components through . Hence, we find that and are Galois extensions of degree . In particular, is not divisible by and, by Hensel’s lemma, and are -th powers in and we may and will assume, by composing with an automorphism if necessary, that .
In particular, the group is cyclic and acts on and by multiplication with -th roots of unity.
- •
In the case that is a smooth point of , the local cover is given by
[TABLE]
for some integers and and units and . Analogous to the first case, we get that and we may assume that .
The group is either cyclic, generated by an element swapping the two components, such that acts by multiplication with primitive -th roots of unity, or is isomorphic to , where the first factor is acting by swapping the two components and the second one by multiplication with -th roots of unity.
In the part that follows, we will assume that the action of is orientation preserving in the following sense.
Definition 18**.**
Let be an algebraically closed field and let be a semi-stable curve over . Let be a finite group. For every , the subgroup acts on the completed local ring of at , and on its cotangent space . The action of on is called orientation preserving at , if for each , this action of on has determinant , where is the sign of the action of on the set consisting of the two edge ends of corresponding to . The action of on is called orientation preserving if it is orientation preserving at every .
Remark 19**.**
As we saw in Remark 17, this condition is easily seen to be verified in case is isomorphic to either or for each . In these cases, the action of on only involves swapping and and multiplying them simultaneously by .
The following proposition will characterise orientation-preserving actions.
Proposition 20**.**
Suppose we are in the setting of Set-up 16, and let . Then the action of on is orientation preserving at if and only if there exists an isomorphism , such that the induced action of can be lifted to , in such a way that it stabilises .
Proof.
If the action of can be lifted in the way described, then the action of each on the cotangent space has determinant equal to 1 if maps to a multiple of and to a multiple of , and determinant otherwise. Now, let us prove the converse.
Suppose that the action of on is orientation preserving at . By Remark 17, we can find an isomorphism , such that each acts on by and in case (or vice versa in case ), for certain roots of unity . Then, the determinant of the action of on the cotangent space is , which is by assumption. Hence, in both cases we have .
Then we can lift the action of on to by making the choice and in case (or vice versa in case ). Under this action, the element is mapped to , as desired. ∎
Now we get to the main result of this section. We will prove that we can deform to a cover of smooth curves in the following sense.
Proposition 21**.**
Suppose we are in the situation of Set-up 16 and that the action of on is orientation preserving. Over the complete discrete valuation ring , with residue field , there exists a -Galois cover of semi-stable curves over such that , and and are smooth, where and are the generic and special point of , respectively.
Proof.
First we shall consider the local structure of the map above the singular points of in order to define the scheme using deformation theory of stable curves. The curve is semi-stable and, as is algebraically closed, we can consider as a stable curve by marking some extra points on the components with low genus if necessary.
In Remark 17, we already saw a description of the completed local rings above the singular points of . Now we take to be any deformation of such that for each singular point as above, we have , using [Bert13, Prop. 4.37, p. 117], where is as in Remark 17.
To lift we will use [Sai12, Prop. 1.2.4, p. 8]. Let , where is the locus where is ramified. For each , we will describe a Galois cover lifting the cover , where is the completion of above . We will consider three cases.
- (i)
If both and the points are smooth, then for each , the local cover is, after composition with an isomorphism if necessary, of the form
[TABLE]
for some not divisible by . The group is acting as multiplication with powers of -th roots of unity. Then we lift this part of the cover to by taking the map
[TABLE]
This is again a Galois cover (for the group ) and for we take a disjoint union of these, one for each , or equivalently one for each element , letting the Galois group act in the natural way.
- (ii)
If both and the points of are singular, then we saw in Remark 17 that for each , is of the form
[TABLE]
for some not divisible by . The group is acting by multiplication with powers of -th roots of unity. We lift this part of the cover to by taking the map
[TABLE]
observing that we use Proposition 20 in order to make this lift. We then continue as in case (i), taking multiple copies of this cover for .
- (iii)
Finally, if is smooth but the points are singular, then we saw in Remark 17 that for each , is, after composition with an isomorphism if necessary, of the form
[TABLE]
for some not divisible by . The group is acting by swapping and and multiplication with powers of -th roots of unity. We lift this part of the cover to by taking the map
[TABLE]
again using Proposition 20. We then continue as in case (i), taking multiple copies of this cover for .
Using [Sai12, Prop. 1.2.4, p. 8], we find a -Galois cover of schemes over , such that the special fibre is and locally above points as above the cover is described by maps
[TABLE]
that we defined in the previous paragraphs. Smoothness of and over follows from the following lemma. ∎
Lemma 22**.**
Let be proper, surjective and flat, such that the special fibre is a semi-stable curve. Assume that for all , which are singular in the special fibre, we have an isomorphism of -algebras
[TABLE]
for some (depending on ), then is smooth.
Proof.
By using [HaMo98, Lem. 3.34, p. 102], we find that is a semi-stable curve. As the smooth locus is open, we know that is smooth in the points specialising to smooth points of . To check that is smooth in the points specialising to a singular point of , we recall the deformation theory of nodal singularities from [DeMu69]. Since we have
[TABLE]
we see that is the locus where the point is nodal, hence the points in the generic fibre specialising to are smooth. ∎
5 Proof of Theorem
Now we can use the results from the previous section to construct smooth ordinary curves.
Proof.
(Theorem, p. Theorem) Take a deformation as in Proposition 21. Then, if is ordinary, also is ordinary, as the -rank is lower semi-continuous, cf. [FvdG04, sect. 2] and [Katz79, Th. 2.3.1]. ∎
Remark 23**.**
Using an argument like Harbater’s, see [MaMa99, Thm. 2.7, p. 376], we can find an ordinary -Galois cover over instead of the much larger field . The idea is that is defined over a finitely generated algebra over . By Bertini-Noether, the locus where the curves are irreducible is Zariski open and dense. Moreover, the ordinary and the smooth locus are also Zariski open and dense. Hence, as was assumed to be algebraically closed, we can find a point to specialise to in order to find an ordinary -Galois cover of smooth curves over .
6 Examples of ordinary curves
In this section, we will apply the theory developed in the previous chapter to construct examples of ordinary curves, which are Galois covers of some other curve. We will treat the following examples.
[TABLE]
As a first example, we will show that there exist ordinary hyperelliptic curves of arbitrary genus in odd characteristic. The following reproves a result of Glass and Pries ([GlPr05, Thm. 1, sect. 2, p. 301]) using the tools that we developed.
Example 24**.**
Let be a prime number and let an integer. Then there exists an ordinary hyperelliptic curve of genus over .
Proof.
We will prove this statement by induction on the genus. For , in order to obtain an ordinary elliptic curve, take two copies of and glue them in two points to obtain a curve . Let act on by swapping the two components. Then the quotient of by is isomorphic to by Proposition 13. We deform this, using the main Theorem (p. Theorem). The resulting curve is a -cover of . As the arithmetic genus is constant on flat families, the generic fibre of gets the structure of an ordinary elliptic curve (by choosing any point as origin) over . Using Remark 23, we can use it to obtain an ordinary elliptic curve over .
Now suppose that we managed to obtain an ordinary hyperelliptic curve of genus . We will construct an ordinary hyperelliptic curve of genus out of this.
Take an ordinary elliptic curve over . Let and be the associated 2:1-covers to . Pick points and such that (resp. ) is ramified at (resp. ). Let be the curve obtained by gluing and in and respectively. Let be the curve obtained by gluing and in and , respectively.
Then there is a natural map and the action of on and extends to , giving the structure of a -Galois cover. Moreover, is ordinary as both and are, cf. Proposition 5. Now the main Theorem (p. Theorem) will give us a curve over , whose generic fibre will be a hyperelliptic curve of genus (as the arithmetic genus is constant in flat families) over . Using Remark 23, we then obtain an ordinary hyperelliptic curve of genus over . ∎
Example 25**.**
Let be a finite group, generated by two elements, of which one has order 2 and the other has order greater than 2 (e.g. or for ). Let be a prime number coprime to . Then there exists an elliptic curve over and a Galois cover with group of smooth curves over such that is ordinary.
id(123)(13)(24)(234)(14)(23)(124)(143)(12)(34)(132)(142)(134)(243)
An illustration of the graph constructed in the proof of Example 25 with and generators and .
Proof.
Let be two generators of , of which is of order 2 and of higher order. Then we can consider the graph , whose vertices are elements and for each vertex , the edge end set consists of four elements, one of which being , such that the other three edge ends are connected to edge ends of , and , respectively. This graph has the property that every vertex is connected to exactly three other vertices. The group acts on the graph by
[TABLE]
Next, we will construct a stable curve out of this graph. As components we take copies of ’s, one for each element , glued together in any arbitrary way such that is the graph associated to . For any pair of triples of distinct points in , there is a unique automorphism sending the first triple of points to the second triple. In this way, we can extend the action of on to an action of on . Using Proposition 13 we find that the quotient is isomorphic to glued to itself in one point. Now we can use Proposition 21 to deform this cover into a -Galois cover of an elliptic curve by an ordinary smooth curve over . Using Remark 23, we obtain the desired cover of smooth curves over . ∎
Remark 26**.**
Any non-abelian finite simple group can be realised in this way. Because of the odd order theorem, such a group has even order. Take any element of order 2. Then there exists, cf. [Ste98], another element such that and generate . By taking instead of if necessary, we may assume that has order greater than 2.
Example 27**.**
If in addition to the hypotheses in Example 25 the group is abelian, let be the group , where acts on by inverting all elements. Then there exists a Galois cover with group , such that is a smooth ordinary curve over .
Proof.
In the case is abelian, also
[TABLE]
is an automorphism of . Using this automorphism, we obtain an action of of . Again the action extends to and the quotient is isomorphic to . Using Proposition 21 and Remark 23 again, we get a -Galois cover of by an ordinary smooth curve over . ∎
Example 28**.**
Let be an integer and let be a prime number coprime to . Then there exists a Galois cover with group , such that is a smooth ordinary curve over .
Proof.
Consider the regular -gon as a graph and let act on it. By gluing copies of subsequently in the points [math] and (gluing the [math] of one curve to the of the next one), we can construct a semi-stable curve whose associated graph is .
An example with : four copies of glued in a square form.
The group acts on in a natural way and this action can be extended to , using the automorphism to mirror the sides of the -gon, if necessary. The quotient is isomorphic to (cf. Proposition 13) and by deforming it, using Proposition 21 and Remark 23, we find a -Galois cover of by an ordinary smooth curve over . ∎
Example 29**.**
Let be a prime number. Then there exists a Galois cover with group such that is a smooth ordinary curve over .
The Petersen graph.
Proof.
This time take to be the Petersen graph (see the figure). Its automorphism group is . We construct the curve by taking 10 copies of and glue them arbitrarily to obtain a stable curve, whose associated graph is . We extend the action of the subgroup on to , like in the previous examples. This action satisfies all the necessary conditions. The quotient is and by deforming again, we find a -Galois cover of by an ordinary smooth curve. ∎
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[Bert 13] J. Bertin, Algebraic stacks with a view toward moduli stacks of covers. Arithmetic and geometry around Galois theory. Edited by P. Dèbes, M. Emsalem, M. Romagny and A. M. Uludaǧ. Birkhäuser/Springer, Basel, 2013.
- 2[De Mu 69] P. Deligne, D. Mumford, The irreducibility of the space of curves of given genus. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 36 , 75–109.
- 3[Fvd G 04] C. Faber, G. van der Geer, Complete subvarieties of moduli spaces and the Prym map. J. Reine Angew. Math. 573 (2004), 117–137.
- 4[Gl Pr 05] D. Glass, R. Pries, Hyperelliptic curves with prescribed p 𝑝 p -torsion. Manuscripta Math. 117 , no. 3 (2005), 299–317.
- 5[EGA 4] A. Grothendieck, Élements de géométrie algébrique. IV. Étude locale des schémas et des morphismes de schémas. Première partie. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 32 (1967).
- 6[Har 84] D. Harbater, Mock covers and Galois extensions. J. Algebra 91 , no. 2 (1984), 281–293.
- 7[Har 87] D. Harbater, Galois coverings of the arithmetic line. Number theory (New York, 1984–1985), 165–195. Springer, Berlin, 1987.
- 8[Ha Mo 98] J. Harris, I. Morrison, Moduli of Curves. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 187. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.
