Thermodynamic properties of quadrupolar states in the frustrated pyrochlore magnet Tb$_2$Ti$_2$O$_7$
H. Takatsu, T. Taniguchi, S. Kittaka, T. Sakakibara, and H. Kadowaki

TL;DR
This study investigates the low-temperature thermodynamic behavior of Tb$_2$Ti$_2$O$_7$, revealing a phase transition to a quadrupolar state and persistent spin ice fluctuations, advancing understanding of frustrated pyrochlore magnets.
Contribution
It provides detailed thermodynamic measurements of Tb$_2$Ti$_2$O$_7$ near the quadrupolar phase transition, highlighting entropy changes and fluctuation effects.
Findings
Observation of a specific heat peak at 0.53 K indicating a quadrupolar phase transition.
Detection of persistent entropy release above the transition temperature.
Field dependence of entropy change suggests complex magnetic correlations.
Abstract
The low-temperature thermodynamic properties of the frustrated pyrochlore TbTiO have been studied using the single crystal of sitting in a long range ordered phase in the - phase diagram. We observed that the specific heat exhibits a minimum around 2 K and slightly increases on cooling, similar to a Schottky-like anomaly for canonical spin ices. A clear specific-heat peak observed at K is ascribable to the phase transition to a quadrupolar state, which contributes to a relatively large change in entropy, J Kmol. However, it is still smaller than for the ground state doublet of the Tb ions. The entropy release persists to higher temperatures, suggesting strong fluctuations associated with spin ice correlations above . We discuss the field dependence of the entropy change forā¦
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Thermodynamic properties of quadrupolar states in the frustrated pyrochlore magnet Tb2Ti2O7
H. Takatsu1,2
āā
T. Taniguchi2
āā
S. Kittaka3
āā
T. Sakakibara3
āā
and H. Kadowaki2
1Department of Energy and Hydrocarbon Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto 615-8510, Japan
2Department of Physics, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan
3Institute for Solid State Physics, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa 277-8581, Japan
Abstract
The low-temperature thermodynamic properties of the frustrated pyrochlore Tb2+xTi2-xO7+y have been studied using the single crystal of sitting in a long range ordered phase in the ā phase diagram. We observed that the specific heat exhibits a minimum around 2Ā K and slightly increases on cooling, similar to a Schottky-like anomaly for canonical spin ices. A clear specific-heat peak observed at Ā K is ascribable to the phase transition to a quadrupolar state, which contributes to a relatively large change in entropy, Ā JĀ K*-1mol-1*. However, it is still smaller than for the ground state doublet of the Tb ions. The entropy release persists to higher temperatures, suggesting strong fluctuations associated with spin ice correlations above . We discuss the field dependence of the entropy change for and .
1 Introduction
Geometrically frustrated magnets have attracted much attention because of the realization of new type of electronic and magnetic phenomena with unconventional order parametersĀ [1, 2]. In particular, the pyrochlore-lattice magnet Tb2+xTi2-xO7+y, a putative candidate of quantum spin liquid (QSL)Ā [3, 4], shows unique properties including an unknown long range order (LRO) in the vicinity () of the QSL stateĀ [5, 6]. Indeed a clear specific-heat peak was observed at Ā K for the sample with , while no LRO associated with the large magnetic and/or structural phase transitions was confirmedĀ [5]. Although the only small Bragg peak with the order of 0.1Ā /Tb appears below , it is too small to explain the corresponding entropy change in the specific heat. It is thus apparently different from the magnetic dipole order inferred by earlier theoriesĀ [7, 8]. This mysterious, or hidden, order is an important subject for the study of the actual nature of the ground state of Tb2Ti2O7Ā [9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18].
Recently, we have investigated the hidden order of Tb2+xTi2-xO7+y using a single crystalline sample with ( K) by means of neutron scattering, specific heat, magnetization measurements [19, 20]. From the semi-quantitative analysis based on the theoretical model proposed by Onoda and Tanaka [21, 22], we have demonstrated that the ordered state originates from electric quadrupole moments inherent in the non-Kramers ion of Tb3+. It is remarkable that the estimated parameter set is located very close to the phase boundary between the quadrupolar and U(1) QSL states. This result naturally explains the previous experimental result that the minute change in induces a phase transition between the QSL and LRO states [5, 6]. These results also showed remarkable behaviors and possibilities for magnetic field, such as a two dimensional (2D) quadrupole order for , where the system behaves as decoupled 2D kagomé layers of quadrupole moments separated by triangular layers of polarized magnetic moments, which is reminiscent of the so-called kagomé ice (KI) state of spin ice (SI) materials [23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29].
Therefore, it is intriguing to examine thermodynamic properties of the quadrupolar state in Tb2+xTi2-xO7+y under magnetic field. For this purpose, we studied specific heat () and the entropy () change of a sample showing the LRO. Here we focus on experiments in the [111] and [001] field directions and show the ā and ādependence of and . We found that the plateau-like behavior of appears in fields around 0.5Ā T only for , while the change is soon suppressed for . This plateau state is attributed to the change in states or the formation of the quadrupole order on the kagomĆ© layers perpendicular to the magnetic field.
2 Experimental
Single crystals of Tb2+xTi2-xO7+y were grown by a floating zone methodĀ [6]. We used the crystal with . Specific heat was measured by a quasi-adiabatic heat-pulse or thermal relaxation method. In a temperature range below 2Ā K, we used a dilution, 3He, and an adiabatic demagnetization refrigerators, while above 2Ā K we used a Quantum Design PPMS system. The in-field data presented here were obtained using a vector magnet system where an accuracy of the field direction to the sample is below . In order to reduce the demagnetization effect, we used a plate-like crystal along the plane which includes the [111], [110], and [001] axes. The sample is approximately Ā mm3 which is 0.35Ā mg in weight. Since the demagnetization factor for the [111] and [001] directions is small enough (), demagnetization corrections were not performed in the present study.
3 Results and Discussion
Temperature dependence of at zero field is shown in Fig.Ā 1. The specific heat exhibits a minimum around 2Ā K and slightly increases on cooling toward Ā K, implying a Schottky-type anomaly characterized by SI correlationsĀ [30]. A clear peak at results in the phase transition to the quadrupolar stateĀ [20]. These behaviors are compatible with the experimental results of the polycrystalline sample of Ā [5].
In order to analyze the low- behavior of the specific heat of the ground state doublet () and its entropy change, it is important to estimate other contributions and subtract those from the measured data. The specific heat of insulating Tb2+xTi2-xO7+y is represented as . Here is a contribution attributed to higher-energy crystal electric field (CEF) states. This contribution was calculated by taking the CEF scheme obtained by Ref.Ā [31] and assuming the Schottky specific heat. It is slightly visible at temperatures above 2Ā K and becomes negligible below 1Ā K. is the lattice specific heat estimated in the same way as described in Ref.Ā [7]. As reference, this is negligibly small at low temperatures (viz. below 3Ā K)Ā [7, 32]. is the nuclear specific heat showing the Schottky anomaly. It is finite in a LRO state with the finite magnetic-dipole or electric-quadrupole hyperfine field from 4 momentĀ [33, 34] or in external magnetic fieldĀ [35], because of the nuclear level splitting of the nuclear spin of 159Tb with the natural abundance 100%, which mostly contributes to . For this estimation, we fitted the low- part in the range between 0.1 and 0.4Ā K using the relation of , where is assumed to be the power law temperature dependence with respect to low- excitations for the phase transition, and is tentatively used as the term proportional to : and are the coefficients of these dependences. One of the fitting results is shown in Fig.Ā 1. The low- behavior down to 0.15Ā K can be fitted by this simple relation. However, it is not applicable for the data below 0.15 K. Although we extended to fit the data using higher order terms of obtained by both considerations of magnetic dipole hyperfine coupling and electric nuclei-quadrupole couplingĀ [36], the fitting was not improved. This may reflect low energy fluctuations or other anomalous contributions such as photon-like excitations and the proximity of quantum criticalityĀ [37, 5]. It is also considered that a coupling between low energy fluctuations of moments and nuclear spins (and also quadrupole moments) of the Tb nuclei may give rise to the anomalous enhancement of . Indeed, the energy scale of 0.1Ā K corresponds to 10Ā eV and then the inelastic neutron spectrum previously observed around Ā [5] could be ascribable to the possible existence of such low energy excitations, although higher resolution experiments are needed to clarify this point. Otherwise, the anomalous enhancement of might be related to the lowering of the thermal conductivity of the sample on cooling, which may cause temperature gradient inside the sample and overestimation of the value, although the small and thin crystal was used for the experiments. Note that such a large enhancement of has been also observed in a QSL of the metallic pyrochlore Pr2Ir2O7Ā [38]. More precise and careful measurements are required for further understanding. The fitting yields , , and . Since the coefficient is written to be using the magnetic hyperfine constant , quadrupole coupling constant , and gas constant Ā [36], it is roughly estimated that Ā K when or Ā K when (or then and are expected within half values of those). These values are the same order of the values for systems including Tb nuclei and the theoretical expectation for the case of the Tb metalĀ [39, 40]. We thus considered that the estimation of is approximately reasonable and intended to focus on the data above 0.15Ā K at present for the evaluation of the entropy, which was calculated from the integration of . The corresponding entropy change in temperature is shown in the inset of Fig.Ā 1.
It is remarkable that the entropy in zero field at is 2.7Ā JĀ K*-1mol-1*. This value is about 50% of expected for a non-Kramers doublet of the Tb ions. Even when we consider the low- contribution below 0.15Ā K, it doesnāt reach . Instead, the entropy release persists to higher temperatures and is saturated around 3Ā K, as seen in the inset of Fig.Ā 1. This behavior is similar to that of previous experiments for a sample showing LROĀ [41]. These results imply that strong fluctuations still persist to temperatures higher than . It is also suggested that a QSL-like state or the proximity of it could realize at temperatures between near and Ā K, where slightly increases like a Schottky anomaly signified by SI correlations and the value is also large enough (Ā Ā JĀ K*-1mol-Tb-1*): these imply finite excitation density of states or large magnetic fluctuations of quantum or thermally-excited monopoles, although does not exhibit the plateau of the residual entropy, which is masked or must be released by the sharp peak of at .
FigureĀ 2(a) shows the temperature dependence of the field variation of the entropy, , for . For these estimations, we used the same method described above, assuming that and in fields are also negligibly small at low temperatures below 1Ā K. Interestingly, it is found that exhibits quantitatively the same behavior in fields around 0.5Ā T, while it decreases (or increases) with increasing (or decreasing) magnetic fields in a temperature range up to 0.8Ā K. These behaviors reflect the properties of the ā phase diagram for [Fig.Ā 2(b)], where the 3D quadrupolar state is considered to be replaced by the 2D quadrupolar state, and then by the magnetic state at low temperatures. In fact, as plotted in Fig.Ā 2(c), the field dependence of the entropy change around zero-field , , exhibits a plateau-like behavior around 0.5Ā T for . This decreases rapidly for reflecting the relatively small field that induces the magnetic state above 0.3Ā TĀ [42]. It is considered that at the intermediate field (Ā T) for , the phase transition occurs only due to the change of the state in each kagomĆ©-lattice layer, which could only contribute to the change in entropy. Therefore, this situation may lead to almost the same temperature dependence of around 0.5Ā T and the plateau state of .
Now we find that the difference of between at 0 and around 0.5Ā T for is about 0.7Ā JĀ K*-1mol-1*. Then, a question is what does this value mean? An interesting scenario is that, if the states in 0 and about 0.5Ā T around 1Ā K are similar to the classical SI and KI states and the residual entropies of these states are released by the phase transition and then zero as expected from the quantum modelĀ [43], the difference of between at 0 and around 0.5Ā T may possibly correspond to the difference between the SI residual entropy (1.68Ā JĀ K*-1mol-1*)Ā [44] and the KI residual entropy (0.67Ā JĀ K*-1mol-1*)Ā [45, 46]; i.e., Ā JĀ K*-1mol-1*. In fact, the value of 0.7Ā JĀ K*-1mol-1* is close to this value. It is considered that this entropy will be released at temperatures higher than 0.8Ā K. For this context, further detailed experiments at higher temperatures under magnetic field are interesting future subjects.
4 Conclusion
In conclusion, we reported thermodynamic properties of the quadrupole-order sample of Tb2+xTi2-xO7+y with . We observed that the specific heat shows a minimum around 2Ā K and slightly increases on cooling, which is similar to a Schottky-type anomaly for canonical spin ices. A clear peak at Ā K results in the phase transition to the quadrupolar state. The entropy change at is 2.7Ā JĀ K*-1mol-1*, which is smaller than and suggests the strong fluctuations that remains at higher temperatures than . The field dependence of the entropy change around 0.5Ā K and in 0.5Ā T for exhibits a plateau. This characteristic feature probably reflects the formation of the two-dimensional quadrupolar state by the [111] magnetic field.
\ack
We thank S. Onoda, Y. Kato, R. Higashinaka, M. Wakita, and H. Kageyama for useful discussions and their assistance. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant numbers 25400345 and 26400336. One of the specific heat measurements was performed using facilities of ISSP, University of Tokyo. One of the authors would like to acknowledge the support from the Motizuki Fund of Yukawa Memorial Foundation.
References
- [1]
Lacroix C, Mendels P and Mila F (eds) 2011 Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer)
- [2]
Gingras MĀ JĀ P and McClarty PĀ A 2014 Rep. Prog. Phys. 77 056501
- [3]
Gardner JĀ S, Dunsiger SĀ R, Gaulin BĀ D, Gingras MĀ JĀ P, Greedan JĀ E, Kiefl RĀ F, Lumsden MĀ D, MacFarlane WĀ A, Raju NĀ P, Sonier JĀ E, Swainson I and Tun Z 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 1012
- [4]
Gardner JĀ S, Keren A, Ehlers G, Stock C, Segal E, Roper JĀ M, Fak B, Stone MĀ B, Hammar PĀ R, Reich DĀ H and Gaulin BĀ D 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 180401
- [5]
Taniguchi T, Kadowaki H, Takatsu H, Fak B, Ollivier J, Yamazaki T, Sato TĀ J, Yoshizawa H, Shimura Y, Sakakibara T, Hong T, Goto K, Yaraskavitch LĀ R and Kycia JĀ B 2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 060408(R)
- [6]
Wakita M, Taniguchi T, Edamoto H, Takatsu H and Kadowaki H 2016 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 683 012023
- [7]
Gingras MĀ JĀ P, den Hertog BĀ C, Faucher M, Gardner JĀ S, Dunsiger SĀ R, Chang LĀ J, Gaulin BĀ D, Raju NĀ P and Greedan JĀ E 2000 Phys. Rev. B 62 6496
- [8]
Kao YĀ J, Enjalran M, Maestro AĀ D, Molavian HĀ R and Gingras MĀ JĀ P 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 172407
- [9]
Molavian HĀ R, Gingras MĀ JĀ P and Canals B 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 157204
- [10]
Bonville P, Mirebeau I, Gukasov A, Petit S and Robert J 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 184409
- [11]
Petit S, Guitteny S, Robert J, Bonville P, Decorse C, Ollivier J, Mutka H and Mirebeau I 2015 EPJ Web Conf. 83 03012
- [12]
Guitteny S, Mirebeau I, deĀ Rotier PĀ D, Colin CĀ V, Bonville P, Porcher F, Grenier B, Decorse C and Petit S 2015 Phys. Rev. B 92 144412
- [13]
Fritsch K, Ross KĀ A, Qiu Y, Copley JĀ RĀ D, Guidi T, Bewley RĀ I, Dabkowska HĀ A and Gaulin BĀ D 2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 094410
- [14]
Fritsch K, Kermarrec E, Ross KĀ A, Qiu Y, Copley JĀ RĀ D, Pomaranski D, Kycia JĀ B, Dabkowska HĀ A and Gaulin BĀ D 2014 Phys. Rev. B 90 014429
- [15]
Kermarrec E, Maharaj DĀ D, Gaudet J, Fritsch K, Pomaranski D, Kycia JĀ B, Qiu Y, Copley JĀ RĀ D, Couchman M, Morningstar A, Dabkowska HĀ A and Gaulin BĀ D 2015 Phys. Rev. B 92 245114
- [16]
Fennell T, Kenzelmann M, Roessli B, Mutka H, Ollivier J, Ruminy M, Stuhr U, Zaharko O, Bovo L, Cervellino A, Haas MĀ K and Cava RĀ J 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 017203
- [17]
Ruminy M, Bovo L, Pomjakushina E, Haas MĀ K, Stuhr U, Cervellino A, Cava RĀ J, Kenzelmann M and Fennell T 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93 144407
- [18]
Ruminy M, Groitl F, Keller T and Fennell T arXiv:1607.07688
- [19]
Kadowaki H, Takatsu H, Taniguchi T, FƄk B and Ollivier J 2015 SPIN 5 1540003
- [20]
Takatsu H, Onoda S, Kittaka S, Kasahara A, Kono Y, Sakakibara T, Kato Y, FÄk B, Lynn J O J W, Taniguchi T, Wakita M and Kadowaki H 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 217201
- [21]
Onoda S and Tanaka Y 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 047201
- [22]
Onoda S and Tanaka Y 2011 Phys. Rev. B 83 094411
- [23]
Matsuhira K, Hiroi Z, Tayama T, Takagi S and Sakakibara T 2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 L559
- [24]
Hiroi Z, Matsuhira K, Takagi S, Tayama T and Sakakibara T 2002 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 72 411
- [25]
Higashinaka R, Fukazawa H and Maeno Y 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 014415
- [26]
Sakakibara T, Tayama T, Hiroi Z, Matsuhira K and Takagi S 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 207205
- [27]
Tabata Y, Kadowaki H, Matsuhira K, Hiroi Z, Aso N, Ressouche E and FƄk B 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 257205
- [28]
Takatsu H, Goto K, Otsuka H, Higashinaka R, Matsubayashi K, Uwatoko Y and Kadowaki H 2013 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82 073707
- [29]
Otsuka H, Takatsu H, Goto K and Kadowaki H 2014 Phys. Rev. B 90 144428
- [30]
Harris MĀ J, Bramwell SĀ T, Holdsworth PĀ CĀ W and Champion JĀ DĀ M 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 4496
- [31]
Mirebeau I, Bonville P and Hennion M 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 184436
- [32]
Ruminy M, Valdez MĀ N, Wehinger B, Bosak A, Adroja DĀ T, Stuhr U, Iida K, Kamazawa K, Pomjakushina E, Prabakharan D, Haas MĀ K, Bovo L, Sheptyakov D, Cervellino A, Cava RĀ J, Kenzelmann M, Spaldin NĀ A and Fennell T 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93 214308
- [33]
Elliott RĀ J and Stevens KĀ WĀ H 1953 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 218 553
- [34]
Bleaney B and Hill RĀ W 1961 Proc. Roy. Soc. 78 313
- [35]
Gopal EĀ SĀ R 1966 Specific Heats at Low Temperatures (New York: Ā Plenum Press)
- [36]
Lounasmaa OĀ V and Roach PĀ R 1962 Phys. Rev. 128 622
- [37]
Hermele M, Fisher MĀ PĀ A and Balents L 2004 Phys. Rev. B 69 064404
- [38]
Tokiwa Y, Ishikawa JĀ J, Nakatsuji S and Gegenwart P 2014 Nature Mater. 13 356
- [39]
Kondo J 1961 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 16 1690
- [40]
Bleaney B 1963 J. Appl. Phys. 16 1690
- [41]
Hamaguchi N, Matsushita T, Wada N, Yasui Y and Sato M 2004 Phys. Rev. B 69 132413
- [42]
Takatsu H, Taniguchi T, Kittaka S, Sakakibara T and Kadowaki H 2016 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 683 012023
- [43]
Kato Y and Onoda S 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 077202
- [44]
Ramirez AĀ P, Hayashi A, Cava RĀ J, Siddharthan R and Shastry BĀ S 1999 Nature 399 333
- [45]
Udagawa M, Ogata M and Hiroi Z 2002 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 71 2365
- [46]
Moessner R and Sondhi SĀ L 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 184512
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Lacroix C, Mendels P and Mila F (eds) 2011 Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer)
- 2[2] Gingras M J P and Mc Clarty P A 2014 Rep. Prog. Phys. 77 056501
- 3[3] Gardner J S, Dunsiger S R, Gaulin B D, Gingras M J P, Greedan J E, Kiefl R F, Lumsden M D, Mac Farlane W A, Raju N P, Sonier J E, Swainson I and Tun Z 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 1012
- 4[4] Gardner J S, Keren A, Ehlers G, Stock C, Segal E, Roper J M, Fak B, Stone M B, Hammar P R, Reich D H and Gaulin B D 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 180401
- 5[5] Taniguchi T, Kadowaki H, Takatsu H, Fak B, Ollivier J, Yamazaki T, Sato T J, Yoshizawa H, Shimura Y, Sakakibara T, Hong T, Goto K, Yaraskavitch L R and Kycia J B 2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 060408(R)
- 6[6] Wakita M, Taniguchi T, Edamoto H, Takatsu H and Kadowaki H 2016 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 683 012023
- 7[7] Gingras M J P, den Hertog B C, Faucher M, Gardner J S, Dunsiger S R, Chang L J, Gaulin B D, Raju N P and Greedan J E 2000 Phys. Rev. B 62 6496
- 8[8] Kao Y J, Enjalran M, Maestro A D, Molavian H R and Gingras M J P 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 172407
