Varieties of sums of powers and moduli spaces of (1,7)-polarized abelian surfaces
Michele Bolognesi, Alex Massarenti

TL;DR
This paper explores the geometry of specific varieties of sums of powers linked to the Klein quartic, leading to a description of the birational geometry of certain moduli spaces of abelian surfaces, including their unirationality.
Contribution
It provides a new geometric understanding of the moduli space of (1,7)-polarized abelian surfaces with additional structures, establishing its unirationality.
Findings
The moduli space _2(1,7)^{-}_{sym} is unirational.
A dominant morphism from a unirational conic bundle to the moduli space is constructed.
The study connects varieties of sums of powers with the geometry of abelian surface moduli spaces.
Abstract
We study the geometry of some varieties of sums of powers related to the Klein quartic. This allows us to describe the birational geometry of certain moduli spaces of abelian surfaces. In particular we show that the moduli space of -polarized abelian surfaces with a symmetric theta structure and an odd theta characteristic is unirational by showing that it admits a dominant morphism from a unirational conic bundle.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Advanced Algebra and Geometry · Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
Varieties of sums of powers and moduli spaces of (1,7)-polarized abelian surfaces
Michele Bolognesi
Michele Bolognesi
IMAG - Université de Montpellier
Place Eugène Bataillon
34095 Montpellier Cedex 5
France
and
Alex Massarenti
Alex Massarenti
Universidade Federal Fluminense
Rua Mário Santos Braga
24020-140, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro
Brazil
(Date: March 12, 2024)
Abstract.
We study the geometry of some varieties of sums of powers related to the Klein quartic. This allows us to describe the birational geometry of certain moduli spaces of abelian surfaces. In particular we show that the moduli space of -polarized abelian surfaces with a symmetric theta structure and an odd theta characteristic is unirational by showing that it admits a dominant morphism from a unirational conic bundle.
Key words and phrases:
Moduli of abelian surfaces; Varieties of sums of powers; Rationality problems; Rational, unirational and rationally connected varieties
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary 11G10, 11G15, 14K10; Secondary 14E05, 14E08, 14M20
Contents
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Ordered varieties of sums of powers
- 3 Moduli of polarized abelian surfaces with level structure
- 4 Birational geometry of moduli spaces of (1,7)-polarized abelian surfaces
1. Introduction
Varieties of sums of powers, for short, parametrize decompositions of a general homogeneous polynomial as sums of powers of linear forms. They have been widely studied from both the biregular [IR01], [Muk92], [RS00] and the birational viewpoint [MM13], [Mas16], and furthermore in relation to secant varieties [COV17a], [COV17b], [Mel06], [Mel09].
The relation of , the moduli space of abelian surfaces with a polarization of type and a -level structure, with the variety of sums of powers of the Klein quartic dates back to the work of S. Mukai [Muk92].
In this paper we investigate the birational geometry of some moduli spaces of abelian surfaces related to . In particular, if we endow the abelian surfaces in with a symmetric theta structure and a theta characteristic (odd or even), we obtain two new moduli spaces, and , that are finite covers of degree and respectively of . For a general introduction to these spaces see [BM16, Sections 6.1.1]. We introduce also the moduli space parametrizing abelian surfaces with a polarization of type , a -level structure and a -level structure.
Furthermore, we introduce new types of varieties of sums of powers and showcase rational maps between them and our moduli spaces of abelian surfaces. The first variety of sums of powers we take into account is a variety where we also allow ourselves to fix an order on the linear forms that make up the decomposition of the polynomial. Let , with be the degree Veronese embedding of , and let be the corresponding Veronese variety.
Definition 1.1**.**
Let be a general polynomial of degree in variables. We define
[TABLE]
and by taking the closure of in .
Then we consider the natural action of the symmetric group on and two related variations on the classical definition of .
Definition 1.2**.**
Consider the rational action of on given by permuting the linear forms . The variety is the quotient
[TABLE]
If is even, we consider the rational action of on such that the first and the second copy of act on the first and the last linear forms respectively. Let . This space comes with a natural -action switching and . We define
[TABLE]
The first main result of this paper is the following.
Theorem 1.3**.**
The moduli spaces and are birational to the varieties and respectively, where is the Klein quartic. Furthermore, the moduli space is birational to .
The apolarity theory developed in [DK93] allows us to produce in Section 2 a -fold conic bundle dominating , and to conclude that it is unirational. In Section 4 we develop some birational geometry of the moduli spaces of abelian surfaces that we are considering. In particular, as a consequence of the above result, we get the following.
Theorem 1.4**.**
The moduli space is unirational, and hence its Kodaira dimension is .
At the end of the paper we also propose some open questions on the birational geometry of and . Throughout all the paper we will work over the complex field.
Acknowledgments
The authors are members of the Gruppo Nazionale per le Strutture Algebriche, Geometriche e le loro Applicazioni of the Istituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica ”F. Severi” (GNSAGA-INDAM). The first named author is member of the GDR ”Géométrie Algébrique Géométrie Complexe” of the CNRS.
2. Ordered varieties of sums of powers
Let , with be the Veronese embedding induced by , and let be the corresponding Veronese variety.
Definition 2.1**.**
Let be a general homogeneous polynomial of degree . Let be a positive integer and the Hilbert scheme of sets of points in . We define
[TABLE]
and by taking the closure of in .
Assume that the general polynomial is contained in a -linear space -secant to . Then, by [Dol04, Proposition 3.2] the variety has dimension
[TABLE]
Furthermore, if then for varying in an open Zariski subset of the variety is smooth and irreducible.
In order to apply these objects to the study of abelian surfaces, we need to construct similar varieties parametrizing decomposition of homogeneous polynomials as sums of powers of linear forms and admitting natural generically finite rational maps onto .
Definition 2.2**.**
Let be a general point. We define
[TABLE]
and by taking the closure of in .
Note that is a variety of dimension . Furthermore, two general points of define the same point of if and only if they differ by a permutation in the symmetric group . Therefore, we have a generically finite rational map
[TABLE]
of degree
Remark 2.3**.**
Arguing as in the proof of [Dol04, Proposition 3.2], with instead of the Hilbert scheme , we can show that if for a general polynomial the variety is smooth and irreducible of dimension .
Definition 2.4**.**
Consider the rational action of on given by permuting the linear forms . The variety is the quotient
[TABLE]
If is even consider the rational action of on where the first and the second copy of act on the first and the last linear forms respectively. Let . Therefore
[TABLE]
comes with a natural -action switching and . We define
[TABLE]
Note that admits a generically finite rational map
[TABLE]
of degree , and that the points in the fiber of over a general point can be identified with the linear forms themselves. Similarly has a generically finite rational map
[TABLE]
of degree .
The variety can be explicitly constructed in the following way. Let us consider the incidence variety
[TABLE]
Then is the closure of in .
Remark 2.6**.**
In [Muk92] Mukai proved that if is a general polynomial then is a smooth Fano -fold of index and genus . In this case we have a generically to rational map , a generically to rational map , and a generically to rational map .
By [GP01, Corollary 5.6], under the same assumptions on , the moduli space of -polarized abelian surfaces with canonical level structure is birational to . As already observed in [MS01, Theorem 4.4] the Klein quartic
[TABLE]
is general in the sense of Mukai [Muk92], hence the variety is isomorphic to the variety of sums of powers obtained for any other general quartic curve.
Let be a complex vector space of dimension , choose coordinates in and the dual coordinates in . Let be a homogeneous polynomial of even degree , and consider the basis of given by
[TABLE]
where . The -th catalecticant matrix of is the symmetric matrix whose lines are the order partial derivatives of written in the basis (2.8) in lexicographic order. The matrix induces a symmetric bilinear form
[TABLE]
For our purposes the following result will be fundamental.
Lemma 2.9**.**
[Dol04, Proposition 3.8]** Let be a homogeneous polynomial of even degree and assume that can be decomposed as
[TABLE]
and the powers are linearly independent in . Then for any .
We refer to [Dol04, Section 2.3] for further details on the bilinear form .
Example 2.10**.**
The variety of sums of powers of the Klein quartic will play a central role in the rest of the paper. The second catalecticant matrix of is given by
[TABLE]
and hence if , where by Lemma 2.9 we have that
[TABLE]
Definition 2.11**.**
For any we define the variety as the subvariety of cut out by the conditions for any with .
Proposition 2.12**.**
We have that is a smooth unirational -fold conic bundle defined by a polynomial of bidegree , and is an irreducible complete intersection -fold defined by three polynomials of multidegree and .
Proof.
Let be the homogeneous coordinates in the -th factor of . Therefore, a point in with homogeneous coordinates corresponds to the linear form .
By (2.10) we have that if two general linear forms appear in a decomposition of then they must satisfy the following equation
[TABLE]
Note that the hypersurface is a divisor in of multidegree with and for any . Therefore, is cut out by the equation
[TABLE]
Considering the nine standard affine charts covering we can prove that is smooth.
Note that any of the two projections onto the factors induces on a structure of conic bundle over . If we choose for instance the projection on the first factor then (2.12) yields that the discriminant of the conic bundle is the smooth sextic given by
[TABLE]
Now [Mel14, Corollary 1.2] implies that is unirational.
Let us consider the case . We have that is the complete intersection -fold defined by the equations
[TABLE]
Finally, by a standard Macaulay2 [Mac92] script we can show that is irreducible. ∎
Proposition 2.14**.**
For there exist generically finite dominant morphisms
[TABLE]
of degree and respectively. Furthermore, there is a morphism
[TABLE]
whose general fiber is a smooth curve of general type. Finally, there exists a generically finite rational map
[TABLE]
of degree . In particular is unirational.
Proof.
By Lemma 2.9 the image of the restriction of the projection is contained in . Let be two general linear forms appearing in a decomposition of , and assume that
[TABLE]
Set , , and consider the subspaces generated by the second partial derivatives of for . Note that , . Furthermore, since appear in the six derivatives of and also in the six derivatives of we get that and must intersect in a -plane. Hence
[TABLE]
Consider two general elements in the pencil of conics determined by the hyperplanes in containing . Then
[TABLE]
for . Since the ’s are general and do not have a common irreducible component and hence .
This means that a general decomposition of can be reconstructed just by knowing two of the linear forms appearing in it. In particular , and a fortiori , are generically finite onto their images. On the other hand, by Proposition 2.12 we have that and are irreducible -folds, and this yields when .
Furthermore, since a point in a general fiber of is determined up to a permutation of points we conclude that is a generically finite dominant morphism of degree , and is a generically finite dominant morphism of degree .
Let be the restriction to of any of the projections, say the first one. A standard Macaulay2 [Mac92] computation shows that the fiber of over is a smooth connected curve in . Therefore a general fiber of is a smooth connected curve as well. Note that by (2.13) is a smooth complete intersection defined by three polynomials of bi-degree respectively. By adjunction we get that the canonical sheaf of is given by
[TABLE]
and hence is ample.
Now, consider the case . Let be a general point. By the first part of the proof we know that determine a unique set of four linear forms such that gives a decomposition of as sum of six powers of linear forms. Therefore, keeping in mind (2.5) we may define a dominant rational map
[TABLE]
of degree . Finally, since by Proposition 2.12 is unirational we conclude that is unirational as well. ∎
3. Moduli of polarized abelian surfaces with level structure
In this section we recall a couple of very specific results from [BM16] that are needed here, and construct two new moduli spaces of abelian surfaces by introducing new arithmetic subgroups of . For general results see [BL04], [GP01], [Bol07] or the first four sections of [BM16]. Since all the abelian surfaces we will deal with will be endowed with a polarization of type , we will not mention any more this datum in the rest of the paper. Let be the Siegel half space of abelian surfaces.
3.0. Arithmetic subgroups and quotients of
Let be the space of matrices with integer entries and let be the diagonal matrix
[TABLE]
We define the subgroup as:
[TABLE]
and the subgroup as
[TABLE]
where if and only if . See also [BL04, Section 8.3.1] for further details on this kind of groups.
Thanks to [BL04, Section 8.2] and the Baily-Borel theorem [BB66], since is a congruence arithmetic subgroup of the Siegel modular group, the quasi-projective variety is the moduli space of abelian surfaces endowed with a polarization of of type (the reader may see also [KH93, Proposition 1.21]). Moreover, by [BL04, Section 8.3] and [BB66], the quasi-projective variety is the moduli space of abelian surfaces with a polarization of type and a canonical level structure.
On such an abelian surface, there exists symmetric line bundles representing the polarization. Let us denote by the -vector space of -torsion points of , and let be a polarization. We define a symmetric bilinear form as , where is the imaginary part of the Hermitian form of the polarization.
Definition 3.1**.**
A theta characteristic is a quadratic form associated to , i.e.
[TABLE]
for all .
In the following we will denote the set of theta characteristics by . To every symmetric line bundle we can associate a theta characteristic.
Definition 3.2**.**
Let be a symmetric line bundle, and . We define as the scalar such that is the multiplication by .
Alternatively, let be the symmetric divisor on such that , the quadratic form can be defined as follows:
[TABLE]
From [BL04, Lemma 4.6.2] we observe that the set of theta characteristics on an abelian surface is a torsor under the action of , therefore it has cardinality . In the case of a -polarization there are even and odd line bundles [BL04, Section 4.7].
Recall that a theta structure induces in a natural way a canonical level structure, and that different theta structure may induce the same level structure. The case is peculiar, in this sense. In fact, we have the following lemma, which is a consequence of [BM16, Lemmas 2.6 and 4.1].
Lemma 3.3**.**
Let be an abelian surface with a canonical -level structure . There exists a unique symmetric theta structure that induces the level structure .
Hence the datum of a level structure is equivalent to that of a symmetric theta structure. We will now study the action of the arithmetic subgroups previously defined on the set of symmetric line bundles, that admit a symmetric theta structure. In our particular case, by [BL04, Section 6.9] and [BM16, Section 2] each symmetric line bundle admits a unique symmetric theta structure.
The set of symmetric theta divisors is in bijection with the set of half-integer characteristics ([BL04, Sections 4.6 and 4.7] or [Igu64, Section 2]). The action of a symplectic matrix on induces an action on characteristics given by the following formula, for :
[TABLE]
Lemma 3.4**.**
[Igu64, Section 2]** The action of on half-integer characteristics defined by formula (3.3) has two orbits distinguished by the invariant
[TABLE]
We will say that is an even (resp. odd) half-integer characteristic if (resp. ), and this notion of parity corresponds to those defined on symmetric theta divisors (or symmetric line bundles) and on theta-characteristics. Hence, in the following with a slight abuse of language we will call an (symmetric) line bundle the line bundle corresponding to an odd theta characteristic.
The modular group acts on the set of theta characteristics through reduction modulo two, hence via . Moreover, we have the following short exact sequence [BM16, Lemma 4.2]
[TABLE]
where is in fact the reduction modulo two map. Let be the stabilizer of an odd quadratic form. There is an isomorphism , where is the symmetric group. Under this isomorphism operates on the set of odd quadratic forms via permutations. Therefore, for the stabilizer subgroup of an odd theta characteristic we also have .
Definition 3.5**.**
We denote by the group
[TABLE]
that fits in the exact sequence
[TABLE]
More explicitly
[TABLE]
Hence, we have . Moreover, note that and imply that Since is a congruence arithmetic subgroup of , thanks to the Baily-Borel theorem [BB66], we obtain that the quotient
[TABLE]
is a quasi-projective variety. The variety is the moduli space of -polarized abelian surfaces with an odd symmetric line bundle and a -level structure (or, which is the same, a symmetric theta structure for ). The degree of the morphism that forgets the odd line bundle is .
The same arguments hold, with slight modifications, if we want to construct moduli spaces for polarized abelian surfaces with level structure (or a symmetric theta structure) and an even line bundle in .
Let be the stabilizer of an even quadratic form.
Definition 3.6**.**
We denote by the group
[TABLE]
that fits in the middle of the exact sequence
[TABLE]
The stabilizer subgroup of an even quadratic form is of order and Using once again the Baily-Borel theorem [BB66], we have that the quotient
[TABLE]
is a quasi-projective variety. It is the moduli space of -polarized abelian surfaces with -level structure and an even theta characteristic. Analogously to the odd case, the morphism forgetting the even theta characteristic has degree .
These ideas are summarized in the following statement.
Proposition 3.7**.**
There exist arithmetic subgroups and such that there are quasi-projective moduli spaces
* and *
that parametrize abelian surfaces with a -structure, or equivalently a symmetric theta structure, and respectively an even or an odd theta characteristic.
Definition 3.8**.**
We define
[TABLE]
By [BB66] and [BL04, Section 8.3], the quasi-projective variety
[TABLE]
is the moduli space of abelian surfaces with a polarization of type , a level -structure and a level -structure.
In the rest of the paper, while we will not change notation, all the moduli spaces considered will be non-singular models of suitable compactifications of the quasi-projective ones.
3.8. Theta-Null maps
Let us now recall shortly how to construct theta-null maps for moduli spaces of -polarized abelian surfaces, with a level structure and a theta-characteristic.
As we have explained in the preceding section, we identify theta-characteristics with symmetric line bundles, representing the polarization. Hence, we start from the datum of an abelian surface with a -polarization , a level structure and a symmetric line bundle representing the polarization. As we have seen there exist symmetric line bundles, even and odd, inside the variety parametrizing line bundles that induce the polarization .
Let us pick the unique normalized linearization [Mum66, Section 2] on for the canonical involution on , and call the corresponding eigenspaces. From Lemma 3.3 we know that the datum of a symmetric theta structure is equivalent to that of a level structure. The upshot is the following:
if is even, the symmetric theta structure yields an identification between and an abstract . Similarly, we identify with an abstract ;
- -
if is odd, the symmetric theta structure yields an identification between and an abstract . In a similar way, we have an identification of with an abstract .
The abstract projective spaces appearing in the preceding lists are all eigenspaces of involutions acting on the Scrödinger representation of the appropriate Heisenberg groups (see [BM16, Section 5] for details).
Let be a polarized abelian surface , with an even (respectively odd) line bundle representing the -polarization, and a symmetric theta structure .
The Theta-Null maps (see [BM16, Section 5.1] for details and definitions) for abelian surfaces with a theta characteristic are defined as follows.
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where stays for the evaluation of global sections of at the origin. We remark that global sections that are anti-invariant with respect to the canonical involution on vanish at the origin. This is basically why we want to consider only invariant spaces of sections via the symmetric theta structure.
4. Birational geometry of moduli spaces of (1,7)-polarized abelian surfaces
Recall that a proper variety over an algebraically closed field is rationally connected if two general points can be joined by an irreducible rational curve.
In [BM16, Theorem 2] we proved that the moduli space of abelian surfaces with a symmetric theta structure and an odd theta characteristic is rationally connected.
Clearly, rationality implies unirationality, which in turns implies rational connectedness. If is a smooth algebraic variety over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero and these three notions are indeed equivalent [Har01, Remark 1.3].
On the other hand, it is well known that a smooth cubic -fold is unirational but not rational [CG72]. It is a long-standing open problem whether there exist varieties which are rationally connected but not unirational [Har01, Section 1.24].
In this section, by using the techniques developed in Section 2 we will prove that is unirational.
Theorem 4.1**.**
Let and be the moduli spaces of abelian surfaces with level -structure, a symmetric theta structure and an odd, respectively even theta characteristic.
The moduli spaces and are birational to the varieties of sums of powers and respectively, where is the Klein quartic. Furthermore, the moduli space is birational to .
Proof.
Let be the moduli space of abelian surfaces with a -level structure. Recall from [BM16, Section 6.1.1] that there exists a Theta-Null map .
By [MS01] and [GP01, Proposition 5.4 and Corollary 5.6] there exists a birational map mapping a general to the set of the odd -torsion points of , that are naturally mapped to by the Theta-Null map. The six points of give a decomposition in .
Each of the odd -torsion points correspond to a choice of an odd theta characteristic via . Now, consider a general point of over . We may define a rational map sending to the linear form in that corresponds to , where is the map in Remark 2.6. To conclude it is enough to observe that since is birational the map is birational as well.
In particular, since the generic abelian surface is Jacobian, odd theta characteristics correspond to the Weierstrass points of the corresponding curve. It is a classical fact that even theta characteristics correspond to partitions of the Weierstrass points into two -elements sets, see for example [DO88, Chapter 8]. This directly implies that is birational to .
Finally, recall that a -level structure for a Jacobian abelian surface corresponds to a complete ordering of the Weierstrass points [DO88, Chapter 8]. This in turn implies that the moduli space is birational to . ∎
We summarize the situation in the following diagram, where the superscripts on the arrows indicate the degrees of the respective maps.
[TABLE]
Theorem 4.2**.**
The moduli space is unirational, and hence its Kodaira dimension is .
Proof.
Since by Proposition 2.14 is unirational the claim follows from Proposition 4.1. ∎
Remark 4.3**.**
The moduli space admits a rational fibration over whose general fiber is a curve of general type.
Indeed, the fibers of the restriction to of the first projection are mapped by onto the fibers of the morphism .
By Proposition 2.14 the general fiber of is a curve of general type. Hence the general fiber of is of general type as well, and by Proposition 4.1 induces a rational fibration of over whose general fiber is a curve of general type.
4.3. Questions
We close the paper with some open questions on the birational type of the moduli spaces and or equivalently of the varieties of sums of powers and .
Question 4.4**.**
Are and varieties of general type?
We would like to mention that the analogous problem for the variety of sums of powers where is a general cubic polynomial, has been studied in [RR93]. Indeed, by [RR93, Theorem 8.3] we have that is of general type.
Note that by Proposition 2.14 we have a finite morphism
[TABLE]
where is a complete intersection irreducible -fold cut out by equations of multi-degree , and . Therefore, by adjunction the dualizing sheaf of is
[TABLE]
We checked using Macaulay2 [Mac92] that is singular along a curve.
Question 4.5**.**
Are the singularities of the -fold at worst canonical?
Note that a positive answer to this last question would imply that , and hence , are of general type.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[BB 66] W. Baily and A. Borel, Compactification of arithmetic quotients of bounded symmetric domains , Ann. of Math. (2) 84 (1966), 442–528.
- 2[BL 04] C. Birkenhake and H. Lange, Complex abelian varieties , Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, A series of Comprehensive Studies in Mathematics, vol. 32, 2004.
- 3[BM 16] M. Bolognesi and A. Massarenti, Moduli of abelian surfaces, symmetric theta structures and theta characteristics , Comment. Math. Helv. 91 (2016), no. 3, 563–608. MR 3541721
- 4[Bol 07] Michele Bolognesi, On Weddle surfaces and their moduli , Adv. Geom. 7 (2007), no. 1, 113–144. MR 2290643
- 5[CG 72] C. H. Clemens and P. A. Griffiths, The intermediate Jacobian of the cubic threefold , Ann. of Math. (2) 95 (1972), 281–356. MR 0302652
- 6[COV 17a] L. Chiantini, G. Ottaviani, and N. Vannieuwenhoven, Effective Criteria for Specific Identifiability of Tensors and Forms , SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 38 (2017), no. 2, 656–681. MR 3666774
- 7[COV 17b] by same author, On generic identifiability of symmetric tensors of subgeneric rank , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 369 (2017), 4021–4042. MR 3624400
- 8[DK 93] I. V. Dolgachev and V. Kanev, Polar covariants of plane cubics and quartics , Adv. Math. 98 (1993), no. 2, 216–301. MR 1213725
