# Analytical and numerical assessment of accuracy of the approximated   nuclear symmetry energy in the Hartree-Fock theory

**Authors:** Y. Tsukioka, H. Nakada

arXiv: 1704.06407 · 2017-04-24

## TL;DR

This paper evaluates the accuracy of approximating the nuclear symmetry energy using energy differences in Hartree-Fock theory, analyzing errors analytically and numerically across various effective interactions and densities.

## Contribution

It provides a detailed analytical and numerical assessment of the approximation's accuracy within Hartree-Fock theory, highlighting its density and interaction dependence.

## Key findings

- Errors are within 10% up to twice normal density.
- Accuracy varies significantly at higher densities depending on interactions.
- Analytical decomposition clarifies error sources.

## Abstract

The nuclear symmetry energy is defined by the second derivative of the energy per nucleon with respect to the proton-neutron asymmetry, and is sometimes approximated by the energy difference between the neutron matter and the symmetric matter. Accuracy of this approximation is assessed analytically and numerically, within the Hartree-Fock theory using effective interactions. By decomposing the nuclear-matter energy, the relative error of each term is expressed analytically; it is constant or is a single-variable function determined by the function type. The full errors are evaluated for several effective interactions, by inserting values of the parameters. Although the errors stay within $10\%$ up to twice of the normal density irrespective of the interactions, at higher densities accuracy of the approximation significantly depends on the interactions.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.06407/full.md

## Figures

9 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.06407/full.md

## References

12 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.06407/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.06407