# An Optical/near-infrared investigation of HD 100546 b with the Gemini   Planet Imager and MagAO

**Authors:** Julien Rameau, Katherine B. Follette, Laurent Pueyo, Christian Marois,, Bruce Macintosh, Maxwell Millar-Blanchaer, Jason J. Wang, David Vega, Rene, Doyon, David Lafreniere, Eric L. Nielsen, Vanessa Bailey, Jeffrey K., Chilcote, Laird M. Close, Thomas M. Esposito, Jared R. Males, Stanimir, Metchev, Katie M. Morzinski, Jean-Baptiste Ruffio, Schuyler G. Wolff, S. M., Ammons, Travis S. Barman, Joanna Bulger, Tara Cotten, Robert J. De Rosa,, Gaspard Duchene, Michael P. Fitzgerald, Stephen Goodsell, James R. Graham,, Alexandra Z. Greenbaum, Pascale Hibon, Li-Wei Hung, Patrick Ingraham, Paul, Kalas, Quinn Konopacky, James E. Larkin, Jerome Maire, Franck Marchis, Mark, S. Marley, Rebecca Oppenheimer, David Palmer, Jennifer Patience, Marshall D., Perrin, Lisa Poyneer, Abhijith Rajan, Fredrik T. Rantakyro, Dmitry Savransky,, Adam C. Schneider, Anand Sivaramakrishnan, Inseok Song, Remi Soummer,, Sandrine Thomas, J. Kent Wallace, Kimberly Ward-Duong, and Sloane Wiktorowicz

arXiv: 1704.06317 · 2017-05-24

## TL;DR

This study uses optical and near-infrared observations to analyze the protoplanet HD 100546b, revealing that its detected emission is likely a disk feature rather than a planet or accreting object, with implications for understanding planet formation.

## Contribution

It provides new spectroscopic and photometric data showing the emission is consistent with scattered light, challenging previous interpretations of HD 100546b as an accreting protoplanet.

## Key findings

- H band emission is likely scattered light, not a planet.
- Emission appears stationary over 4.6 years, inconsistent with orbit.
- Upper limits on accretion rate suggest no active accretion at detection level.

## Abstract

We present H band spectroscopic and Halpha photometric observations of HD 100546 obtained with GPI and MagAO. We detect H band emission at the location of the protoplanet HD 100546b, but show that choice of data processing parameters strongly affects the morphology of this source. It appears point-like in some aggressive reductions, but rejoins an extended disk structure in the majority of the others. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this emission appears stationary on a timescale of 4.6 yrs, inconsistent at the 2sigma level with a Keplerian clockwise orbit at 59 au in the disk plane. The H band spectrum of the emission is inconsistent with any type of low effective temperature object or accreting protoplanetary disk. It strongly suggests a scattered light origin, as it is consistent with the spectrum of the star and the spectra extracted at other locations in the disk. A non detection at the 5sigma level of HD 100546b in differential Halpha imaging places an upper limit, assuming the protoplanet lies in a gap free of extinction, on the accretion luminosity and accretion rate of 1.7E-4 Lsun and MMdot<6.4E-7Mjup^2/yr for 1Rjup. These limits are comparable to the accretion luminosity and rate of TTauri-stars or LkCa 15b. Taken together, these lines of evidence suggest that the H band source at the location of HD 100546b is not emitted by a planetary photosphere or an accreting circumplanetary disk but is a disk feature enhanced by the PSF subtraction process. This non-detection is consistent with the non-detection in the K band reported in an earlier study but does not exclude the possibility that HD 100546b is deeply embedded.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.06317/full.md

## Figures

8 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.06317/full.md

## References

80 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.06317/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.06317