ADMM Penalty Parameter Selection by Residual Balancing
Brendt Wohlberg

TL;DR
This paper critically examines a common heuristic for selecting the penalty parameter in ADMM, reveals a significant flaw, and proposes a modification to improve its effectiveness.
Contribution
The paper identifies a flaw in the existing residual balancing heuristic for ADMM penalty parameter selection and proposes a modified approach to address it.
Findings
Identifies a flaw in the residual balancing heuristic.
Proposes a modified penalty parameter selection method.
Improves the reliability of ADMM performance.
Abstract
Appropriate selection of the penalty parameter is crucial to obtaining good performance from the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM). While analytic results for optimal selection of this parameter are very limited, there is a heuristic method that appears to be relatively successful in a number of different problems. The contribution of this paper is to demonstrate that their is a potentially serious flaw in this heuristic approach, and to propose a modification that at least partially addresses it.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques · Control Systems and Identification · Fault Detection and Control Systems
