Dark matter, dark energy, and alternate models: A review
Kenath Arun (1,2), S. B. Gudennavar (1), C Sivaram (3) ((1), Department of Physics, Christ University (2) Department of Physics, Christ, Junior College (3) Indian Institute of Astrophysics)

TL;DR
This review discusses the current understanding, candidates, and models of dark matter and dark energy, including alternative theories and methods to distinguish between them, highlighting ongoing challenges and future prospects.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of dark matter and dark energy candidates, models, and alternatives, including recent observational constraints and detection efforts.
Findings
Multiple viable dark matter candidates identified
Current observations favor cosmological constant for dark energy
Alternative theories like MOND and modified gravity are considered
Abstract
The nature of dark matter (DM) and dark energy (DE) which is supposed to constitute about 95% of the energy density of the universe is still a mystery. There is no shortage of ideas regarding the nature of both. While some candidates for DM are clearly ruled out, there is still a plethora of viable particles that fit the bill. In the context of DE, while current observations favour a cosmological constant picture, there are other competing models that are equally likely. This paper reviews the different possible candidates for DM including exotic candidates and their possible detection. This review also covers the different models for DE and the possibility of unified models for DM and DE. Keeping in mind the negative results in some of the ongoing DM detection experiments, here we also review the possible alternatives to both DM and DE (such as MOND and modifications of general…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
