# Interpreting the time variable RM observed in the core region of the TeV   blazar Mrk 421

**Authors:** R. Lico, J. L. G\'omez, K. Asada, A. Fuentes

arXiv: 1704.06133 · 2017-10-30

## TL;DR

This study analyzes a year-long, multi-frequency VLBA monitoring of blazar Mrk 421, revealing variable rotation measure (RM) trends linked to magnetic field structures and jet dynamics, providing insights into the jet's magnetic environment.

## Contribution

It is the first to interpret and discuss the one-year RM variability in Mrk 421's core, proposing a model with nested helical magnetic fields to explain RM sign reversals.

## Key findings

- RM shows two sign reversals over a year.
- The jet sheath is likely the main Faraday screen.
- Nested helical magnetic fields explain RM behavior.

## Abstract

In this work we interpret and discuss the time variable rotation measure (RM) found, for the first time over a 1-yr period, in the core region of a blazar. These results are based on a one-year, multi-frequency (15, 24, and 43 GHz) Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) monitoring of the TeV blazar Markarian 421 (Mrk 421). We investigate the Faraday screen properties and its location with respect to the jet emitting region. Given that the 43 GHz radio core flux density and the RM time evolution suggest a similar trend, we explore the possible connection between the RM and the accretion rate. Among the various scenarios that we explore, the jet sheath is the most promising candidate for being the main source of Faraday rotation. During the one-year observing period the RM trend shows two sign reversals, which may be qualitatively interpreted within the context of the magnetic tower models. We invoke the presence of two nested helical magnetic fields in the relativistic jet with opposite helicities, whose relative contribution produce the observed RM values. The inner helical field has the poloidal component ($B_{\rm p}$) oriented in the observer's direction and produces a positive RM, while the outer helical field, with $B_{\rm p}$ in the opposite direction, produces a negative RM. We assume that the external helical field dominates the contribution to the observed RM, while the internal helical field dominates when a jet perturbation arises during the second observing epoch. Being the intrinsic polarization angle parallel to the jet axis, a pitch angle of the helical magnetic field $\phi\gtrsim 70^\circ$ is required. Additional scenarios are also considered to explain the observed RM sign reversals.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.06133/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.06133/full.md

## References

50 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.06133/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.06133