Enhancement of Galaxy Overdensity around Quasar Pairs at z<3.6 based on the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program Survey
Masafusa Onoue, Nobunari Kashikawa, Hisakazu Uchiyama, Masayuki, Akiyama, Yuichi Harikane, Masatoshi Imanishi, Yutaka Komiyama, Yoshiki, Matsuoka, Tohru Nagao, Atsushi J. Nishizawa, Masamune Oguri, Masami Ouchi,, Masayuki Tanaka, Yoshiki Toba, Jun Toshikawa

TL;DR
This study uses the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program Survey to analyze galaxy overdensities around quasar pairs at z<3.6, revealing that such pairs often reside in dense proto-cluster environments, suggesting mergers trigger quasar activity.
Contribution
It provides the first large-scale statistical analysis of galaxy overdensities around quasar pairs at different redshifts, highlighting their association with massive haloes and dense regions.
Findings
Quasar pairs at z~3.3 and 3.6 are in >5sigma overdense regions.
At z~1, 37 pairs are found in dense environments, including cluster fields.
Quasar pairs tend to occur in massive haloes, useful for finding density peaks.
Abstract
We investigate the galaxy overdensity around proto-cluster scale quasar pairs at high (z>3) and low (z~1) redshift based on the unprecedentedly wide and deep optical survey of the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program (HSC-SSP). Using the first-year survey data covering effectively ~121 deg^2 with the 5sigma depth of i~26.4 and the SDSS DR12Q catalog, we find two luminous pairs at z~3.3 and 3.6 which reside in >5sigma overdense regions of g-dropout galaxies at i<25. The projected separations of the two pairs are R_perp=1.75 and 1.04 proper Mpc, and their velocity offsets are Delta V=692 and 1448 km s^{-1}, respectively. This result is in clear contrast to the average z~4 quasar environments as discussed in Uchiyama et al. (2017) and implies that the quasar activities of the pair members are triggered via major mergers in proto-clusters, unlike the vast majority of isolated quasars…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
