# On the detection probability of neutron star glitches

**Authors:** Meng Yu, Qinjian Liu

arXiv: 1704.05983 · 2017-04-21

## TL;DR

This paper analyzes the probability of detecting neutron star glitches, accounting for observational constraints, and uncovers the underlying glitch size distribution using Monte Carlo simulations and Bayesian inference.

## Contribution

It introduces a method to calculate detection probabilities of neutron star glitches considering observational biases and derives the glitch size distribution from observational data.

## Key findings

- Detection probability varies with observational cadence and noise.
- The glitch size distribution follows a power-law with a corrected exponent.
- Most significant correction found for PSR J1341-6220.

## Abstract

Neutron stars are observed to undergo small, abrupt rotational speed-up. This phenomenon is known as glitch. In pulsar timing observations, detection of a neutron star glitch is constrained by the time of occurrence of the event relative to entire observing span and observing cadences, time of occurrence of preceding/subsequent glitches relative to observing cadences and the strength of timing noise. Using the Yu et al. (2013) data sets, in this paper, we analyse the observational selection in terms of detection probability. We define partial probabilities for the constraints and use Monte Carlo method with assuming glitches distribute uniformly to solve the complete probability formula for both group case involving 157 pulsars and individual cases for each of the seven pulsars with glitch numbers $\geqslant 5$. In the simulations, numerical Bayesian inference is used for glitch identification. With the derived detection probability density and observed results, we uncover glitch size probability distribution embedded in the data for both the group and individual cases. We find the most prominent correction occurred for PSR~J1341$-$6220, in which exponent of the power-law model varies from the observed $+0.7^{+1.4}_{-0.7}$ to $-0.4^{+1.0}_{-0.4}$. We suggest observers determine the detection probability for glitch theories, e.g. the self-organised criticality.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.05983/full.md

## Figures

10 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.05983/full.md

## References

26 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.05983/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.05983