Physics with ions at the Future Circular Collider
David d'Enterria, L. Apolinario, N. Armesto, A. Dainese, J. Jowett,, J.P. Lansberg, S. Masciocchi, G. Milhano, C. Roland, C.A. Salgado, M., Schaumann, M. van Leeuwen, U.A. Wiedemann

TL;DR
The paper discusses the potential physics research opportunities at the Future Circular Collider, including studying quark-gluon plasma, heavy quarks, and Higgs bosons in high-energy nuclear collisions.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of the unique experimental conditions and physics topics accessible with the FCC's nuclear collision program.
Findings
Enhanced charm-quark densities enable detailed QGP studies.
Observation of quarkonia melting at high temperatures.
Access to extremely low fractional momenta in nuclear parton distributions.
Abstract
The unique physics opportunities accessible with nuclear collisions at the CERN Future Circular Collider (FCC) are summarized. Lead-lead (PbPb) and proton-lead (pPb) collisions at = 39 and 63 TeV respectively with = 33 nb and 8 pb monthly integrated luminosities, will provide unprecedented experimental conditions to study quark-gluon matter at temperatures (1 GeV). The following topics are succinctly discussed: (i) charm-quark densities thrice larger than at the LHC, leading to direct heavy-quark impact in the bulk QGP properties, (ii) quarkonia, including , melting at temperatures up to five times above the QCD critical temperature, (iii) access to initial-state nuclear parton distributions (nPDF) at fractional momenta as low as , (iv) availability of top-quark pairs per run to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Physics with ions at the Future Circular Collider
David d’Enterria† for the FCC-ions study group (L. Apolinario, N. Armesto, A. Dainese, J. Jowett, J.P. Lansberg, S. Masciocchi, G. Milhano, C. Roland, C.A. Salgado, M. Schaumann, M. van Leeuwen, U.A. Wiedemann)
†CERN, EP Department, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
Abstract
The unique physics opportunities accessible with nuclear collisions at the CERN Future Circular Collider (FCC) are summarized. Lead-lead (PbPb) and proton-lead (pPb) collisions at = 39 and 63 TeV respectively with = 33 nb*-1* and 8 pb*-1* monthly integrated luminosities, will provide unprecedented experimental conditions to study quark-gluon matter at temperatures (1 GeV). The following topics are succinctly discussed: (i) charm-quark densities thrice larger than at the LHC, leading to direct heavy-quark impact in the bulk QGP properties, (ii) quarkonia, including , melting at temperatures up to five times above the QCD critical temperature, (iii) access to initial-state nuclear parton distributions (nPDF) at fractional momenta as low as , (iv) availability of about top-quark pairs per run to study the high- gluon nPDF and the energy loss properties of boosted colour-antennas, (v) study of possible Higgs boson suppression in the QGP, and (vi) high-luminosity (ultraperipheral) collisions at c.m. energies up to 1 TeV.
keywords:
FCC , nuclear collisions , charm , quarkonia , low- QCD , top quark , Higgs boson , photon-photon collisions
1 Introduction
The FCC is a future collider project under study at CERN aiming at proton-proton (pp) collisions at a centre-of-mass (c.m.) energy = 100 TeV in a new 80–100 km tunnel with 16–20 T dipoles [1]. The FCC operation with nuclear beams yields nucleon-nucleon c.m. energies = 39 TeV (63 TeV) for PbPb (pPb), i.e. 7 larger than those accessible at the LHC. The expected (monthly) integrated luminosities are also 10 above the LHC values: = 33 nb*-1* and 8 pb*-1* for PbPb and pPb [2, 3]. This writeup succinctly summarizes the novel physics opportunities at reach with nuclear collisions at the FCC, covering the detailed studies presented in [3] plus some more recent developments.
2 Global medium properties, and small- QCD
At 39 TeV, central PbPb collisions will produce 3 600 charged particles per unit rapidity at midrapidity, according to an extrapolation of the current data based on a dependence. For a participant volume of V = 11 000 fm3, the formation of a quark-gluon plasma (QGP) with 35–40 GeV/fm3 energy density is expected at = 1 fm/c [3]. At earlier times, the medium temperatures will reach T 1 GeV. The twofold larger multiplicities and hotter medium open up the possibility to carry out event-by-event measurements of high-harmonics of the azimuthal distribution of particles with respect to the reaction plane over a large density range. Such Fourier coefficients are sensitive to different dependencies of the QGP shear-viscosity over entropy-density () ratio as a function of temperature (Fig. 1, left).
The large FCC c.m. energies and correspondingly broad rapidity ranges for particle production result in a very wide kinematical reach in terms of probed fractional momenta in the nuclear parton distribution functions (nPDF). Semihard ( 5 GeV) forward () particles will probe nPDF down to 10*-7*, while cross sections of the “standard candles” W and Z bosons will be sensitive to 10*-4* at midrapidity (Fig. 1, right). Since currently there are no direct data constraints on nPDF below [4], the FCC data provides a huge lever-arm to study the small- parton structure and evolution. Back-to-back jet/hadron correlations at forward in pPb [5], and exclusive production in ultraperipheral (photon-induced) PbPb collisions [6] will be processes particularly sensitive to the saturation regime (below the curve in Fig. 1, right), where standard DGLAP collinear factorization is expected to break down [7].
3 Open charm and bottom, quarkonia, and top quarks
PbPb collisions at 39 TeV will lead to a very abundant production of charm quarks from both initial gluon-gluon interactions (the cross sections will even exceed , indicating a very large probability for multiple charm production per event [8]) plus secondary processes in the thermalizing plasma [9, 10] which increase the final yield by 50–100%. Such large charm densities will have two main consequences. First, since finite-T QCD calculations [11] indicate that charm quarks start contributing as thermal degrees-of-freedom in the QGP equation of state for T 350 MeV, they will modify the bulk thermodynamic properties of the medium compared to lower-energy collisions, as well as actively participate in the collectively flowing medium. Secondly, thermal quarks can recombine into bound states with larger probability than at the LHC [12], leading to a change in the production pattern from the suppression observed so far to an enhanced production at low compared to pp collisions at the same energy [10]. In the bottom-quark sector, the initial QGP temperatures (1 GeV) can lead to direct melting of the (1S) bound-state, expected by lattice-QCD calculations to occur at T = (4–5)Tc [13], although the large density of pairs may partially compensate such a suppression through recombination in the plasma [12].
The top quark production cross sections at FCC energies are very large: 3.2, 300 b in pPb and PbPb respectively [14, 15], i.e. 55–85 larger than at the LHC. The corresponding yields per month, after typical analysis cuts, amount to few pairs in the “cleanest” fully leptonic decay channel, [15] (or about 4 more in the lepton+jets modes). Top quarks provide valuable information of both the initial and final states in nuclear collisions. Since top pairs are dominantly produced in fusion processes, the rapidity distribution of their decay leptons in pPb compared to pp collisions traces accurately the nuclear modification of the gluon nPDF at high scales over a wide range [14]. The impact that the FCC data would have in a nPDF EPS09 global fit [4] is shown via the ratio in Fig. 2 (left). The uncertainties on the nuclear glue are reduced by about a factor of two (grey band compared to red dashes), mostly in the so-far unexplored antishadowing and EMC regions [14, 3].
The top quark can also be used as sensitive probe of in-medium parton energy loss by studying boosted topologies with increasingly longer (Lorentz-dilated) decays into final-state quarks . Due to the Lorentz boost, the system travels through the medium as a colour-singlet antenna for some fraction of the time. By comparing the reconstructed top mass as a function of its (Fig. 2, right), it should be thus possible to get a unique insight into the space-time evolution of jet-quenching in the hot QCD medium [16].
4 Higgs boson suppression, and photon-photon collisions
The FCC will also allow for the observation of the Higgs boson in nuclear collisions since its production cross sections, 0.12, 12 b in pPb and PbPb respectively, are 20 larger than at the LHC [15]. In the clean diphoton “discovery” channel, after branching ratio (BR = 0.23%), acceptance and efficiency losses, one expects about 500 and 1 000 Higgs events per month in PbPb and pPb, on top of the corresponding non-resonant background. Figure 3 (left) shows the expected invariant mass distribution in PbPb at 39 TeV. The expected significance of the diphoton signal (S) over the background (B), computed via S/ at the Higgs peak, is 5.5. Interestingly, once produced, the Higgs boson, with a lifetime of 50 fm/c, traverses the final-state medium and can scatter with the surrounding partons, resulting in a potential depletion of its yields compared to the pp case [17]. Since the Higgs boson production cross section in absence of final-state effects is theoretically very well known [18], the amount of potential Higgs boson suppression can thus be used to accurately determine the density of the produced QGP.
Ultraperipheral interactions of ions, without hadronic overlap, provide very clean means to study photon-photon collisions at high energies, as their luminosities are extremely enhanced in nuclear compared to proton or electron beams (by a factor for PbPb) [19]. Figure 3 (right) shows the effective photon-photon luminosity as a function of the c.m. energy reachable in various colliding systems (, pp, and PbPb) at the LHC and FCC energies. Clearly, PbPb at 39 TeV provides the largest two-photon luminosities, reaching for the first time the energy range beyond 1 TeV. The vertical lines show the thresholds for photon-fusion production of Higgs, , , and . All such processes, sensitive to different tests of the electroweak sector of the Standard Model, will have visible counts at the FCC in its PbPb running mode.
5 Summary
The FCC provides unique physics capabilities for heavy-ion physics in pPb and PbPb collisions with 7 and 10 larger c.m. energies and integrated luminosities than at the LHC. The expected particle and energy densities will be twice above those reached at the LHC, leading to medium temperatures in the 1 GeV range; charm densities will be 3 those at the LHC, leading to a possibly enhanced production by recombination in the plasma; and the tightly-bounded (1S) resonance can be melted in the hot QGP. The large c.m. energies will open up studies of nuclear parton distributions in the unexplored saturation (down to 10*-7*) and large- (antishadowing and EMC domains, with top-quarks) regimes. The heaviest SM elementary particles (top quark and Higgs boson) will be copiously produced, offering novel high-precision handles to study the properties of hot and dense QCD matter. Last but not least, ultraperipheral nuclear collisions will provide high-luminosity two-photon collisions at c.m. energies reaching the TeV range.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] M. Benedikt, B. Goddard, D. Schulte, F. Zimmermann and M. J. Syphers, IPAC-2015-TUPTY 062.
- 2[2] M. Schaumann, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 18 (2015) 091002 [ar Xiv:1503.09107 [physics.acc-ph]].
- 3[3] A. Dainese, U. A. Wiedemann, N. Armesto, D. d’Enterria, J. M. Jowett et al. , ar Xiv:1605.01389 [hep-ph].
- 4[4] K. J. Eskola, H. Paukkunen, C. A. Salgado, JHEP 04 (2009) 065; [ar Xiv:0902.4154 [nucl-th]].
- 5[5] A. H. Rezaeian, Phys. Lett. B 718 (2013) 1058 [ar Xiv:1210.2385 [hep-ph]].
- 6[6] N. Armesto and A. H. Rezaeian, AIP Conf. Proc. 1819 (2017) 030008.
- 7[7] F. Gelis, E. Iancu, J. Jalilian-Marian and R. Venugopalan, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60 (2010) 463 [ar Xiv:1002.0333 [hep-ph]].
- 8[8] D. d’Enterria and A. M. Snigirev, ar Xiv:1612.08112 [hep-ph].
