# Estimations of the seismic pressure noise on Mars determined from Large   Eddy Simulations and demonstration of pressure decorrelation techniques for   the InSight mission

**Authors:** Naomi Murdoch, Balthasar Kenda, Taichi Kawamura, Aymeric Spiga,, Philippe Lognonn\'e, David Mimoun, William B. Banerdt

arXiv: 1704.05664 · 2017-04-20

## TL;DR

This study models Martian atmospheric pressure fluctuations and their seismic effects using Large Eddy Simulations, validating methods and demonstrating pressure decorrelation techniques for the InSight mission to improve seismic data interpretation.

## Contribution

It introduces a comprehensive LES-based model of Martian pressure-induced seismic noise and validates it against existing theories, also demonstrating decorrelation strategies for pressure noise reduction.

## Key findings

- Horizontal seismic noise amplitude ~2-40 nm/s^2
- Vertical accelerations ~0.1-6 nm/s^2
- Pressure decorrelation techniques can reduce seismic noise

## Abstract

The atmospheric pressure fluctuations on Mars induce an elastic response in the ground that creates a ground tilt, detectable as a seismic signal on the InSight seismometer SEIS. The seismic pressure noise is modeled using Large Eddy Simulations of the wind and surface pressure at the InSight landing site and a Green's function ground deformation approach that is subsequently validated via a detailed comparison with two other methods based on Sorrells' theory (Sorrels 1971; Sorrels et al. 1971). The horizontal acceleration as a result of the ground tilt due to the LES turbulence-induced pressure fluctuations are found to be typically ~2 - 40 nm/s^2 in amplitude, whereas the direct horizontal acceleration is two orders of magnitude smaller and is thus negligible in comparison. The vertical accelerations are found to be ~0.1 - 6 nm/s^2 in amplitude.   We show that under calm conditions, a single-pressure measurement is representative of the large-scale pressure field (to a distance of several kilometers), particularly in the prevailing wind direction. However, during windy conditions, small-scale turbulence results in a reduced correlation between the pressure signals, and the single-pressure measurement becomes less representative of the pressure field. Nonetheless, the correlation between the seismic signal and the pressure signal is found to be higher for the windiest period because the seismic pressure noise reflects the atmospheric structure close to the seismometer. In the same way that we reduce the atmospheric seismic signal by making use of a pressure sensor that is part of the InSight APSS (Auxiliary Payload Sensor Suite), we also the use the synthetic noise data obtained from the LES pressure field to demonstrate a decorrelation strategy.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.05664/full.md

## Figures

39 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.05664/full.md

## References

31 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.05664/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.05664