# Deep submillimeter and radio observations in the SSA22 field. I.   Powering sources and Ly{\alpha} escape fraction of Ly{\alpha} blobs

**Authors:** Y. Ao, Y. Matsuda, C. Henkel, D. Iono, D. M. Alexander, S. C. Chapman,, J. Geach, B. Hatsukade, M. Hayes, N. K. Hine, Y. Kato, R. Kawabe, K. Kohno,, M. Kubo, M. Lehnert, M. Malkan, K. M. Menten, T. Nagao, R. P. Norris, M., Ouchi, T. Saito, Y. Tamura, Y. Taniguchi, H. Umehata, and A. Weiss

arXiv: 1704.05101 · 2017-12-13

## TL;DR

This study investigates the heating mechanisms and Lyα escape fractions of 35 Lyα blobs at z=3.1, revealing links between dust emission, radio activity, and morphology, with implications for understanding their physical properties.

## Contribution

It provides new insights into the connection between dust, radio emission, and Lyα escape fractions in LABs, highlighting the role of dust attenuation and morphology.

## Key findings

- Dust detected in 11 LABs with high SFRs
- Radio excess suggests presence of AGN in some LABs
- Lyα escape fraction median is about 3% in submm-detected LABs

## Abstract

We study the heating mechanisms and Ly{\alpha} escape fractions of 35 Ly{\alpha} blobs (LABs) at z = 3.1 in the SSA22 field. Dust continuum sources have been identified in 11 of the 35 LABs, all with star formation rates (SFRs) above 100 Msun/yr. Likely radio counterparts are detected in 9 out of 29 investigated LABs. The detection of submm dust emission is more linked to the physical size of the Ly{\alpha} emission than to the Ly{\alpha} luminosities of the LABs. A radio excess in the submm/radio detected LABs is common, hinting at the presence of active galactic nuclei. Most radio sources without X-ray counterparts are located at the centers of the LABs. However, all X-ray counterparts avoid the central regions. This may be explained by absorption due to exceptionally large column densities along the line-of-sight or by LAB morphologies, which are highly orientation dependent. The median Ly{\alpha} escape fraction is about 3\% among the submm-detected LABs, which is lower than a lower limit of 11\% for the submm-undetected LABs. We suspect that the large difference is due to the high dust attenuation supported by the large SFRs, the dense large-scale environment as well as large uncertainties in the extinction corrections required to apply when interpreting optical data.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.05101/full.md

## Figures

13 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.05101/full.md

## References

86 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.05101/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.05101