# Impact Of Content Features For Automatic Online Abuse Detection

**Authors:** Etienne Papegnies (LIA), Vincent Labatut (LIA), Richard Dufour (LIA),, Georges Linares (LIA)

arXiv: 1704.03289 · 2019-01-16

## TL;DR

This paper investigates the effectiveness of various content features, including community-specific ones, for automatic online abuse detection, aiming to assist or fully automate moderation in online communities.

## Contribution

It evaluates standard and community-specific features for abuse detection and analyzes their usefulness through feature selection, advancing automatic moderation techniques.

## Key findings

- Pre-processing strategies improve detection accuracy.
- Community-specific features enhance model performance.
- Feature selection identifies the most relevant features for abuse detection.

## Abstract

Online communities have gained considerable importance in recent years due to the increasing number of people connected to the Internet. Moderating user content in online communities is mainly performed manually, and reducing the workload through automatic methods is of great financial interest for community maintainers. Often, the industry uses basic approaches such as bad words filtering and regular expression matching to assist the moderators. In this article, we consider the task of automatically determining if a message is abusive. This task is complex since messages are written in a non-standardized way, including spelling errors, abbreviations, community-specific codes... First, we evaluate the system that we propose using standard features of online messages. Then, we evaluate the impact of the addition of pre-processing strategies, as well as original specific features developed for the community of an online in-browser strategy game. We finally propose to analyze the usefulness of this wide range of features using feature selection. This work can lead to two possible applications: 1) automatically flag potentially abusive messages to draw the moderator's attention on a narrow subset of messages ; and 2) fully automate the moderation process by deciding whether a message is abusive without any human intervention.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.03289/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.03289/full.md

## References

18 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.03289/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.03289