A characterization of ZM-groups
Marius T\u{a}rn\u{a}uceanu

TL;DR
This paper characterizes ZM-groups using specific functions and proves a related conjecture, contributing to the understanding of their structure.
Contribution
It provides a new characterization of ZM-groups based on functions, and proves Conjecture 6 from prior work.
Findings
Characterization of ZM-groups established
Proof of Conjecture 6 in [4]
Enhanced understanding of ZM-group functions
Abstract
In this short note we give a characterization of ZM-groups that uses the functions defined and studied in [3,4]. This leads to a proof of Conjecture 6 in [4].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinite Group Theory Research · Geometric and Algebraic Topology · Coding theory and cryptography
A characterization of ZM-groups
Marius Tărnăuceanu
(April 11, 2017)
Abstract
In this short note we give a characterization of ZM-groups that uses the functions defined and studied in [3, 4]. This leads to a proof of Conjecture 6 in [4].
MSC (2010): Primary 20D60, 11A25; Secondary 20D99, 11A99.
Key words: Gauss formula, Euler’s totient function, finite group, order of an element, exponent of a group.
1 Introduction
Given a finite group , we consider the functions
[TABLE]
The class of finite groups for which has been partially determined in [4]. We are now able to complete this study by proving the following result.
Theorem 1.1. Let be a finite group. Then , and we have equality if and only if is a ZM-group, i.e. a group with all Sylow subgroups cyclic.
In particular, since a ZM-group is nilpotent if and only if it is cyclic, we obtain the result in Conjecture 6 of [4].
Corollary 1.2. Let be a finite nilpotent group. Then , and we have equality if and only if is cyclic.
2 Proof of Theorem 1.1
Let be the poset of cyclic subgroups of . For every divisor of we denote by the number of cyclic subgroups of order of and by the number of elements of order in . Then we have
[TABLE]
because a cyclic subgroup of order contains elements of order . One obtains
[TABLE]
as desired.
Assume now that . Then for all non-cyclic subgroups of . Since for any -group we have (see [3]), it follows that all Sylow subgroups of are cyclic, that is is a ZM-group.
Conversely, assume that is a ZM-group. By [2] such a group is of type
[TABLE]
where the triple satisfies the conditions
[TABLE]
It is clear that . The subgroups of have been completely described in [1]. Set
[TABLE]
Then there is a bijection between and the subgroup lattice of , namely the function that maps a triple into the subgroup defined by
[TABLE]
where , for all and . We can easily check that
[TABLE]
and so
[TABLE]
This shows that
[TABLE]
completing the proof.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] W.C. Calhoun, Counting subgroups of some finite groups , Amer. Math. Monthly 94 (1987), 54-59.
- 2[2] B. Huppert, Endliche Gruppen , I, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1967.
- 3[3] M. Tărnăuceanu, A generalization of the Euler’s totient function , Asian-Eur. J. Math. 8 (2015), no. 4, article ID 1550087.
- 4[4] M. Tărnăuceanu, On a generalization of the Gauss formula , Asian-Eur. J. Math. 10 (2017), no. 1, article ID 1750008.
