Comment on "Hamiltonian for the Zeros of the Riemann Zeta Function"
Jean V. Bellissard

TL;DR
This paper critically evaluates a proposed Hamiltonian approach to the Riemann Hypothesis, arguing that the strategy outlined by Bender, Brody, and Müller is flawed and does not constitute a proof.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis showing that the previously proposed Hamiltonian strategy for proving the Riemann Hypothesis is ineffective.
Findings
The proposed Hamiltonian approach does not successfully prove the Riemann Hypothesis.
The authors identify specific flaws in the original strategy.
The critique clarifies limitations of the Hamiltonian method in this context.
Abstract
This comment about the article "Hamiltonian for the Zeros of the Riemann Zeta Function", by C. M. Bender, D. C. Brody, and M. P. M\"uller, published recently in Phys. Rev. Lett. (Phys. Rev. Lett., 118, 130201, (2017)) gives arguments showing that the strategy proposed by the authors to prove the Riemann Hypothesis, does not actually work.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics · Advanced Algebra and Geometry · Mathematical functions and polynomials
