# A global view on the Higgs self-coupling

**Authors:** Stefano Di Vita, Christophe Grojean, Giuliano Panico, Marc Riembau,, Thibaud Vantalon

arXiv: 1704.01953 · 2017-09-22

## TL;DR

This paper investigates methods to measure the Higgs self-coupling at the LHC, demonstrating that combining multiple data channels and differential measurements can effectively constrain its deviation from the Standard Model.

## Contribution

It introduces a comprehensive approach combining single- and double-Higgs data, including differential measurements, to robustly bound the Higgs self-coupling at the LHC.

## Key findings

- Bound on Higgs self-coupling deviation: [0.1, 2.3] at 68% CL
- Inclusion of double-Higgs production improves constraints
- Differential measurements help disentangle coupling effects

## Abstract

The Higgs self-coupling is notoriously intangible at the LHC. It was recently proposed to probe the trilinear Higgs interaction through its radiative corrections to single-Higgs processes. This approach however requires to disentangle these effects from those associated to deviations of other Higgs-couplings to fermions and gauge bosons. We show that a global fit exploiting only single-Higgs inclusive data suffers from degeneracies that prevent one from extracting robust bounds on each individual coupling. We show how the inclusion of double-Higgs production via gluon fusion, and the use of differential measurements in the associated single-Higgs production channels WH, ZH and ttH, can help to overcome the deficiencies of a global Higgs-couplings fit. In particular, we bound the variations of the Higgs trilinear self-coupling relative to its SM value to the interval [0.1, 2.3] at 68% confidence level at the high-luminosity LHC, and we discuss the robustness of our results against various assumptions on the experimental uncertainties and the underlying new physics dynamics. We also study how to obtain a parametrically enhanced deviation of the Higgs self-couplings and we estimate how large this deviation can be in a self-consistent effective field theory framework.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.01953/full.md

## Figures

12 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.01953/full.md

## References

85 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.01953/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.01953