The quality of priority ratios estimation in relation to a selected prioritization procedure and consistency measure for a Pairwise Comparison Matrix
Paul Thaddeus Kazibudzki

TL;DR
This paper investigates how different prioritization procedures and consistency measures affect the accuracy of priority ratio estimations in the Analytic Hierarchy Process, proposing solutions to improve estimation quality.
Contribution
It introduces novel simulation algorithms to evaluate and enhance the quality of priority ratio estimations in AHP under human judgment inconsistencies.
Findings
Certain PPs and CMs can significantly worsen PRs estimation accuracy
Proposed solutions can substantially improve the quality of PRs estimation
Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the new methodology
Abstract
An overview of current debates and contemporary research devoted to the modeling of decision making processes and their facilitation directs attention to the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). At the core of the AHP are various prioritization procedures (PPs) and consistency measures (CMs) for a Pairwise Comparison Matrix (PCM) which, in a sense, reflects preferences of decision makers. Certainly, when judgments about these preferences are perfectly consistent (cardinally transitive), all PPs coincide and the quality of the priority ratios (PRs) estimation is exemplary. However, human judgments are very rarely consistent, thus the quality of PRs estimation may significantly vary. The scale of these variations depends on the applied PP and utilized CM for a PCM. This is why it is important to find out which PPs and which CMs for a PCM lead directly to an improvement of the PRs estimation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Criteria Decision Making · Data Management and Algorithms · Cognitive Science and Mapping
