The Interplay of Semantics and Morphology in Word Embeddings
Oded Avraham, Yoav Goldberg

TL;DR
This paper investigates how different linguistic properties like surface form, lemma, and morphological tags influence the ability of word embeddings to capture semantic and morphological similarities, providing insights into their interplay.
Contribution
It systematically compares models trained on various property subsets to analyze their effects on semantic and morphological representation quality.
Findings
Models using morphological tags improve morphological similarity detection.
Surface form information enhances semantic similarity performance.
Insights into the relationship between morphology and semantics in embeddings.
Abstract
We explore the ability of word embeddings to capture both semantic and morphological similarity, as affected by the different types of linguistic properties (surface form, lemma, morphological tag) used to compose the representation of each word. We train several models, where each uses a different subset of these properties to compose its representations. By evaluating the models on semantic and morphological measures, we reveal some useful insights on the relationship between semantics and morphology.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Speech and dialogue systems
