# Operational one-to-one mapping between coherence and entanglement measures

## TL;DR

This paper reveals a fundamental operational equivalence between coherence and entanglement measures, allowing translation of results and providing practical bounds for experimental quantification.

## Contribution

It establishes a one-to-one operational mapping between coherence and entanglement measures, linking their quantification and interpretation.

## Key findings

- Entanglement measures of pure states are the minimum of coherence measures over product bases.
- Coherence measures of pure states are the maximum entanglement generated by incoherent operations.
- Provides tight observable bounds for entanglement and coherence in experiments.

## Abstract

We establish a general operational one-to-one mapping between coherence measures and entanglement measures: Any entanglement measure of bipartite pure states is the minimum of a suitable coherence measure over product bases. Any coherence measure of pure states, with extension to mixed states by convex roof, is the maximum entanglement generated by incoherent operations acting on the system and an incoherent ancilla. Remarkably, the generalized CNOT gate is the universal optimal incoherent operation. In this way, all convex-roof coherence measures, including the coherence of formation, are endowed with (additional) operational interpretations. By virtue of this connection, many results on entanglement can be translated to the coherence setting, and vice versa. As applications, we provide tight observable lower bounds for generalized entanglement concurrence and coherence concurrence, which enable experimentalists to quantify entanglement and coherence of the maximal dimension in real experiments.