# Optimized Gillespie algorithms for the simulation of Markovian epidemic   processes on large and heterogeneous networks

**Authors:** Wesley Cota, Silvio C. Ferreira

arXiv: 1704.01557 · 2017-07-26

## TL;DR

This paper introduces optimized Gillespie algorithms for simulating Markovian epidemic processes on large, heterogeneous networks, achieving high efficiency without sacrificing statistical accuracy.

## Contribution

It develops and validates new numerical recipes that include phantom processes to improve simulation efficiency for epidemic models on complex networks.

## Key findings

- Optimized algorithms are several orders of magnitude more efficient.
- Simulation outcomes match the original Gillespie algorithm statistically.
- Applicable to various epidemic models like SIS, contact process, and SIR.

## Abstract

Numerical simulation of continuous-time Markovian processes is an essential and widely applied tool in the investigation of epidemic spreading on complex networks. Due to the high heterogeneity of the connectivity structure through which epidemics is transmitted, efficient and accurate implementations of generic epidemic processes are not trivial and deviations from statistically exact prescriptions can lead to uncontrolled biases. Based on the Gillespie algorithm (GA), in which only steps that change the state are considered, we develop numerical recipes and describe their computer implementations for statistically exact and computationally efficient simulations of generic Markovian epidemic processes aiming at highly heterogeneous and large networks. The central point of the recipes investigated here is to include phantom processes, that do not change the states but do count for time increments. We compare the efficiencies for the susceptible-infected-susceptible, contact process and susceptible-infected-recovered models, that are particular cases of a generic model considered here. We numerically confirm that the simulation outcomes of the optimized algorithms are statistically indistinguishable from the original GA and can be several orders of magnitude more efficient.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.01557/full.md

## Figures

9 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.01557/full.md

## References

51 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.01557/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.01557