Blockchain Inefficiency in the Bitcoin Peers Network
Giuseppe Pappalardo, T. Di Matteo, Guido Caldarelli, Tomaso Aste

TL;DR
This paper reveals significant inefficiencies in the Bitcoin network, with many transactions delayed or forgotten, raising concerns about its reliability for time-stamping and the need for better incentive mechanisms.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence of transaction delays and inefficiencies in Bitcoin, highlighting the extent of unprocessed transactions and their impact on system usability.
Findings
43% of transactions not included after 1 hour
20% of transactions not included after 30 days
93% of transaction value included within 3 hours
Abstract
We investigate Bitcoin network monitoring the dynamics of blocks and transactions. We unveil that 43\% of the transactions are still not included in the Blockchain after 1h from the first time they were seen in the network and 20\% of the transactions are still not included in the Blockchain after 30 days, revealing therefore great inefficiency in the Bitcoin system. However, we observe that most of these `forgotten' transactions have low values and in terms of transferred value the system is less inefficient with 93\% of the transactions value being included into the Blockchain within 3h. The fact that a sizeable fraction of transactions is not processed timely casts serious doubts on the usability of the Bitcoin Blockchain for reliable time-stamping purposes and calls for a debate about the right systems of incentives which a peer-to-peer unintermediated system should introduce to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlockchain Technology Applications and Security · Auction Theory and Applications · Data Stream Mining Techniques
